Results 1 to 8 of 8
Like Tree8Likes
  • 1 Post By balance
  • 3 Post By kelkel
  • 3 Post By Couchlockd
  • 1 Post By Ashop

Thread: Why different recommendations starting AI?

  1. #1
    balance is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    376

    Why different recommendations starting AI?

    I have read the stickies several times and understand the reasoning for the strong recommendation of taking an AI (arimidex .25 eod) however the sticky also states to begin this at the same time (or day after) the initial test injection. However in a lot of other threads that I have been reading many of the veteran posters here (who seem very knowledgeable) recommend beginning the AI a few weeks (to me I am reading a few weeks as maybe around 14-21 day mark) after beginning the cycle. What is the reasoning behind delaying the AI start vs beginning the AI right off the bat within the first week of test injection?

    PS I'm not trying to open a long debate here just would like to know the reasoning behind the different suggestions.

    Thank you
    Alfredo111 likes this.

  2. #2
    kelkel's Avatar
    kelkel is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~ No Source Checks
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East Coast Dungeon
    Posts
    30,122
    All personal opinion. Basically, test will peak in 24-48 hours post injection which is why the sticky recommends to start rather quickly. Estrogen naturally follows testosterones peak but at a slower rate. Due to this slower rise some suggest to start somewhat later. Imho a week is about the latest I would wait. In 2 or 3 weeks you could have quite a high estrogen level. Not that it's going to harm you in such a short period or cause gyno there is just no need to allow it to elevate that much.
    -*- NO SOURCE CHECKS -*-

  3. #3
    Couchlockd's Avatar
    Couchlockd is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    aka m.hornbuckle
    Posts
    4,355
    The reason why there's so much confusion over cycling and when to start what is because there is never been any actual medical study on steroid use for performance enhancement

    All we have is anecdotal user stories and what other people experienced we never had a person sit down with a medical doctor or group and map exactly how a 12 week 16 week 24 week for year-long cycle or steroid use should be carried out

    We have no real scientific data based on how we use these compounds we have scientific data on the individual compounds themselves but not an actual mass building muscle making steroid cycle we have to piece together different research different clinical trials on different drugs and try to make the best with what we have in the most educated and informed guess
    Obs, Arcānn and balance like this.

  4. #4
    balance is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    376
    Excellent thank you for the information KelKel and Couchlocked. That makes sense. I was thinking with esters such as cypionate or enanthate that holding off a couple days from initial injection for first AI dose might be fine considering the longer halflife of theses compounds. Probably not a big deal either way and the sticky just lays it out as simply as possible to have better adherence.

    Thank you

  5. #5
    Ashop's Avatar
    Ashop is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,931
    I know some guys who start their AI's the day they begin the cycle (to prevent any problems initially) and I know guys who wait until they think they need an AI and I think that's the wrong approach. If you use it correctly, you wont need much at all. People often wait until problems appear and then throw down massive dosages that causes crashed estrogen and hosts of other problems.
    balance likes this.

  6. #6
    Alfredo111 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by ALIN View Post
    I know some guys who start their AI's the day they begin the cycle (to prevent any problems initially) and I know guys who wait until they think they need an AI and I think that's the wrong approach. If you use it correctly, you wont need much at all. People often wait until problems appear and then throw down massive dosages that causes crashed estrogen and hosts of other problems.
    So ,what is the last opinion of using AI ?! Iam in my 5th week of test prop 150mg eod , boldenone 600/week , should i start AI now or iam too late? If i should start AI , what is preferred? Aromasin or Arimidex and what are the doses? Many thanx

  7. #7
    Quester's Avatar
    Quester is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    NC Highlands
    Posts
    2,616
    You should already be taking an AI so, unless your cycle is finished, it is not to late.

  8. #8
    Mma67's Avatar
    Mma67 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    142
    You need to be taking an ai. I recommend taking it from the beginning. I waited to take it on my current cycle and within a week I had symptoms of gyno. I believe over time I have become more sensitive - not sure if this is common but in my previous cycles I felt like I was good, waited to take an ai, or took a Low dose and experienced slightly elevated estrogen. Now If I wait I seem to get gyno symptoms fairly quick... it started with just itchy nips, then sensitive nips, now it’s just a small lump that forms of my e2 is high. Luckily for me it’s gone away, but I know now that I will grow titties if I don’t control it.

    It’s just better to take it, and personally, I’d rather crash my e2 than deal with Gyno. Just stick to arimidex , unless you have problems then I would go the aromasin route but that may not be necessary.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •