Results 1 to 18 of 18
Like Tree9Likes
  • 1 Post By KINGKONG
  • 1 Post By SampsonandDelilah
  • 1 Post By Gallowmere
  • 2 Post By Windex
  • 1 Post By SampsonandDelilah
  • 1 Post By KINGKONG
  • 1 Post By SampsonandDelilah
  • 1 Post By Gallowmere

Thread: Planning my cycle

  1. #1
    zeph1ro7 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    33

    Planning my cycle

    How's it going guys? First of all let me tell you that english is not my native language, so perhaps some grammar is a little off. Bare with me

    I'm planning to do a cycle in march. it's not my first cycle per se, but it's my first one with some knowledge. I did a couple of cycles about 6-7 years ago and I didn't know shit about nutrition, so the results weren't good and I ended up with gyno (had to go through surgery). That makes me thing that the gear wasn't legit and I ended up aromatizing too much without even taking tamoxifene.

    So tu sum up, this is an idea of my next cycle. Any suggestions or corrections are welcome-

    weeks 1-12: sustanon 500mg p/week
    weeks 1-14: Primobolan 500 mg p/week
    weeks 1-14: Masteron 500mg p/week
    weeks 1-4: Anadrol 50mg ed
    weeks 8-15: Anavar 50mg ed
    weeks 1-15: HCG 250ui every 3.5d

    I'll take 10mg of tamoxifen ed though the whole cycle (no risk of gyno since my surgery, but perhaps it will help me with sides like acne/oily skin)

    Now i'm not sure about the primo/masteron stack since I didn't see many people using it. And not sure about the dosage of each one either.


    Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

  2. #2
    zeph1ro7 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    33
    Any thoughts?

  3. #3
    KINGKONG's Avatar
    KINGKONG is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Outside the walls
    Posts
    4,266

    Planning my cycle

    I like it for a cutting stack..looks expensive
    Forget the nolva it’s unnecessary.
    Are you sure you need all that?
    Your coming off being natural right?
    It seems like a lot of gear for?whats your size again?

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by KINGKONG; 01-15-2020 at 07:47 PM.
    zeph1ro7 likes this.

  4. #4
    SampsonandDelilah's Avatar
    SampsonandDelilah is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    La Cocina
    Posts
    4,208
    Quote Originally Posted by KINGKONG View Post
    I like it for a cutting stack..looks expensive
    Forget the nolva it’s unnecessary.
    Are you sure you need all that?
    Your coming off being natural right?
    It seems like a lot of gear for?whats your size again?

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    ^^^^^^ this

    That’s a ton of gear my friend. Stats? Goals?
    zeph1ro7 likes this.

  5. #5
    zeph1ro7 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by SampsonandDelilah View Post
    ^^^^^^ this

    That’s a ton of gear my friend. Stats? Goals?
    You think is a ton of gear? I don feel that the dosages are crazy. Height 5.75, weight 200 pounds. BF probably around 15% but before I start the cycle I plan to lose about 10 pounds more.

    I think the stack would help me recomp very nicely if I do things right. Then when I'm leaner I could start a more bulking oriented cycle.

    However I'm open to suggestions if you think it's a ton of gear, what would you discard?

  6. #6
    SampsonandDelilah's Avatar
    SampsonandDelilah is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    La Cocina
    Posts
    4,208
    Quote Originally Posted by zeph1ro7 View Post
    You think is a ton of gear? I don feel that the dosages are crazy. Height 5.75, weight 200 pounds. BF probably around 15% but before I start the cycle I plan to lose about 10 pounds more.

    I think the stack would help me recomp very nicely if I do things right. Then when I'm leaner I could start a more bulking oriented cycle.

    However I'm open to suggestions if you think it's a ton of gear, what would you discard?

    As mentioned, I’d drop the nolva. The mast will work as an AI as well. If it’s me, I leave off the anadrol .

    The best recomp stack I’ve run, has been test, tren , mast and anavar . That’s an option too, but many are adverse to tren. Just a thought, as KK mentioned it looks like a good cut stack. Just multiple compounds and didn’t know your cycle history.
    Looks expensive and make sure you’re getting legit primo

  7. #7
    Gallowmere's Avatar
    Gallowmere is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,368
    In addition to the above, fuck Sustanon . Works fine, but not enough to be worth the cost, especially with the injection schedule you’ll be running anyway. Switch that shit for some Enan or Cyp and buy more Primo. Heh.
    KINGKONG likes this.

  8. #8
    Windex is offline Staff ~ HRT Optimization Specialist
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Arctic Circle
    Posts
    4,286
    Quote Originally Posted by KINGKONG View Post
    I like it for a cutting stack..looks expensive
    Forget the nolva it’s unnecessary.
    Are you sure you need all that?
    Your coming off being natural right?
    It seems like a lot of gear for?whats your size again?

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I agree - 2 grams of gear for someone 200 lbs doesn't make sense.

    You could drop the Anadrol , lower test, and still be in great shape.
    I no longer check my inbox. If you PM me I will not reply.

  9. #9
    SampsonandDelilah's Avatar
    SampsonandDelilah is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    La Cocina
    Posts
    4,208
    Quote Originally Posted by Gallowmere View Post
    In addition to the above, fuck Sustanon. Works fine, but not enough to be worth the cost, especially with the injection schedule you’ll be running anyway. Switch that shit for some Enan or Cyp and buy more Primo. Heh.

    Nice Gallow, forgot to mention switching to single ester test...agree 100
    Gallowmere likes this.

  10. #10
    KINGKONG's Avatar
    KINGKONG is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Outside the walls
    Posts
    4,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Windex View Post
    I agree - 2 grams of gear for someone 200 lbs doesn't make sense.

    You could drop the Anadrol, lower test, and still be in great shape.
    Agreed!keep it simple a 200 lb man can gain plenty of mass on 500ng of test and a anabolic very easily, considering diet diet diet diet is on point..did I say diet lol
    If you already have a weight training background, it’s mostly about eating a lot of clean food..the hardest thing about bodybuilding imo .you can always up the gear at a later date..I also agree single ester year would be preferable..


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    SampsonandDelilah likes this.

  11. #11
    zeph1ro7 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by KINGKONG View Post
    Agreed!keep it simple a 200 lb man can gain plenty of mass on 500ng of test and a anabolic very easily, considering diet diet diet diet is on point..did I say diet lol
    If you already have a weight training background, it’s mostly about eating a lot of clean food..the hardest thing about bodybuilding imo .you can always up the gear at a later date..I also agree single ester year would be preferable..


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    could you please elaborate why only one ester is preferable over a blend? not being a douche, I really don't know

  12. #12
    zeph1ro7 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by SampsonandDelilah View Post
    As mentioned, I’d drop the nolva. The mast will work as an AI as well. If it’s me, I leave off the anadrol .

    The best recomp stack I’ve run, has been test, tren , mast and anavar . That’s an option too, but many are adverse to tren. Just a thought, as KK mentioned it looks like a good cut stack. Just multiple compounds and didn’t know your cycle history.
    Looks expensive and make sure you’re getting legit primo
    I put the anadrol to have some kind of kickstart, but yes I suppose I could drop it along with the nolva. I don't want to use tren right now because of the many sides I've read, so I want to start with more mild steroids .

    I'm expecting primo from balkan but it would be really nice if someone, someday, can be a delight and facilitate me the well known domestic source you guys use around here haha

  13. #13
    KINGKONG's Avatar
    KINGKONG is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Outside the walls
    Posts
    4,266
    Quote Originally Posted by zeph1ro7 View Post
    could you please elaborate why only one ester is preferable over a blend? not being a douche, I really don't know
    Too many esters, too long of esters, less control over pct timing, not as stable bloods, more frequent injections
    I would use it ED, I like to shoot my prop everyday..maybe it’s my head but, it seems to give me less sides when I use prop daily..that’s why I don’t choose sus overall
    Less sides and easier to control blood levels with single ester
    Why complicate it?
    Sure others have their own reasons


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  14. #14
    SampsonandDelilah's Avatar
    SampsonandDelilah is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    La Cocina
    Posts
    4,208
    Quote Originally Posted by KINGKONG View Post
    Too many esters, too long of esters, less control over pct timing, not as stable bloods, more frequent injections
    I would use it ED, I like to shoot my prop everyday..maybe it’s my head but, it seems to give me less sides when I use prop daily..that’s why I don’t choose sus overall
    Less sides and easier to control blood levels with single ester
    Why complicate it?
    Sure others have their own reasons


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Nailed it, blood plasma levels, trough, injection frequency and PCT timing


    That being said, there’s certainly guys that love sus. Short or long ester in my opinion. Better to stick with one
    KINGKONG likes this.

  15. #15
    Gallowmere's Avatar
    Gallowmere is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,368
    Quote Originally Posted by KINGKONG View Post
    Too many esters, too long of esters, less control over pct timing, not as stable bloods, more frequent injections
    I would use it ED, I like to shoot my prop everyday..maybe it’s my head but, it seems to give me less sides when I use prop daily..that’s why I don’t choose sus overall
    Less sides and easier to control blood levels with single ester
    Why complicate it?
    Sure others have their own reasons


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I seriously doubt it’s just in your head. I’ve also heard a lot of guys being able to reduce Tren related sides without lowering their dose, just by going to an everyday injection schedule.

    The old halflife estimates were based on bad math that didn’t pan out in clinical testing, so the reduction of sides with ED shouldn’t shock anyone.
    KINGKONG likes this.

  16. #16
    KINGKONG's Avatar
    KINGKONG is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Outside the walls
    Posts
    4,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Gallowmere View Post
    I seriously doubt it’s just in your head. I’ve also heard a lot of guys being able to reduce Tren related sides without lowering their dose, just by going to an everyday injection schedule.

    The old halflife estimates were based on bad math that didn’t pan out in clinical testing, so the reduction of sides with ED shouldn’t shock anyone.
    Still got the pharmacokinetic graphs in the old anabolics books..we can do a bit better than that these days lol
    I think your right it’s not a coincidence when majority of ppl get same results..


    “Used to think I knew it all, then got older”

  17. #17
    Gallowmere's Avatar
    Gallowmere is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,368
    Quote Originally Posted by KINGKONG View Post
    Still got the pharmacokinetic graphs in the old anabolics books..we can do a bit better than that these days lol
    I think your right it’s not a coincidence when majority of ppl get same results..


    “Used to think I knew it all, then got older”
    Absolutely. They had Prop and Ace esters listed at like 2.5 days, when 24 hours is what we’re actually seeing in lab tests. Enan and cyp were listed at 7 and 8 days, when 4.5 and 5 are what we see.

  18. #18
    KINGKONG's Avatar
    KINGKONG is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Outside the walls
    Posts
    4,266
    Wow, That’s night and day difference...imagine the sides that could have been avoided, the gains that were missed..They really should do far more studies on humans and AAS..Sign me up!


    “Used to think I knew it all, then got older”

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •