Thread: No NHL means no draft??
-
10-15-2004, 05:46 PM #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 80
No NHL means no draft??
since the season is most likely not gonna happen this year, is there still gonna be a draft come june?...i dont see a point, and if i was a player being drafted i wouldnt want to be drafted into a crumbling league anyways, id rather go right to europe and start making money
-
10-15-2004, 06:05 PM #2
Yes, there will be a draft.
-
10-15-2004, 07:41 PM #3
When...same time?
-
10-17-2004, 10:51 AM #4
You can be drafted to a team and still play in europe if you wish. It's when you sign a contract for the team your drafted for that you have to play for that team.
-
10-21-2004, 04:38 PM #5
how much do they pay in europe?
-
10-25-2004, 10:17 PM #6Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 80
depends i dont see anyone making more than 1 million, but they hook you up with s*hit cars,house, etc...my buddys uncle plays over in europe and he doesnt have to work a 9-5 job i can tell you that much lol
-
10-26-2004, 08:32 AM #7
dang i would think more
-
10-26-2004, 10:21 PM #8Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 80
i dunno maybe im wrong, but its nothing compared to NHL salaries
-
10-27-2004, 12:20 AM #9
yeah well nhl is comparable to the nba in some regards
-
10-28-2004, 05:34 AM #10
Europe is paid more than the AHL players
-
11-02-2004, 09:18 AM #11
who would have been the top pick if there was a draft?
-
11-02-2004, 03:30 PM #12
There will be a draft still
-
11-02-2004, 03:30 PM #13
Crosby will be number 1. Hes supposed to be the "next gretzky". and if you dont believe that (cuz so many others were supposed to be), the great one said it himself
-
01-12-2005, 09:59 PM #14
europe is bad though
-
01-13-2005, 09:56 AM #15
no doubt about that
-
01-15-2005, 08:05 AM #16Junior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 125
Originally Posted by spoc
-
03-08-2005, 11:02 AM #17
i miss hockey bros
-
03-14-2005, 06:41 PM #18
i miss the league and hockey night
-
03-14-2005, 07:43 PM #19Originally Posted by ImmmtheIceman
So the next "great one" would have to be more of a Mario...and even he was complaining about the C&G
511220
-
03-14-2005, 09:03 PM #20
played against gretzky too many times. he would dominate any era. they can claim all they want. there will never be another 99.
-
03-14-2005, 09:25 PM #21Originally Posted by 1819
The game has changed, if you really have played at that level you would know that.
Not taking anything away from the gr8one, but he would not fair as well today...sorry.
511220
-
03-14-2005, 11:00 PM #22
im 5'9 38 years old. with the guys on lockout i skate 3 to 4 times a week with an nhl team.(informal of course and we would never dream of using the facilities. lol.) the boys are young, big, and fast. i still hold my own no problem. gretz would do just fine believe you me. the only thing that has changed with the bigger guys is the amount of room you have to operate. when i played i think the biggest guy in the league was only like 215. guy named klienendorst with the rangers. if you can play, you can play. look at martin st louis from tampa, he's smaller than me. he is a hell of a player and not even close to what wayne was. if we were talking about football, then and now, i think it would be a different story. but in our sport, size really doesnt matter.
-
03-15-2005, 07:06 AM #23
Well it's fun to debate none-the-less 1819. I dont know, I still feel the now tolerated clutching and grabbing along with big speed would give him problems.
Just my opinion.
Nice to see you still lacing em up at 38. I'm 35 and havnt gone 30 and over yet
511220
-
03-15-2005, 10:17 AM #24Originally Posted by 511220
-
03-31-2005, 12:13 AM #25
cool bro
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS