Thread: IS this kid on the juice?
-
11-14-2005, 08:56 PM #41Originally Posted by Lavinco
-
11-14-2005, 10:30 PM #42Junior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- South
- Posts
- 128
lolololololololololol
-
11-15-2005, 02:42 AM #43Originally Posted by Lavinco
-
11-15-2005, 06:12 AM #44Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- L'Inghilterra
- Posts
- 1,611
Originally Posted by inspector_injector
The US is way different
-
11-15-2005, 06:47 AM #45Originally Posted by Lavinco
Oldman
-
11-15-2005, 08:36 AM #46Originally Posted by Lavinco
-
11-15-2005, 09:21 AM #47Originally Posted by Shaka
-
11-16-2005, 11:38 AM #48Associate Member
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- U.S.A.
- Posts
- 301
Shaka~
yeah i know a lot of world class athletes that aren't strong, yeah i totally agree with you, i guess according to you athletes don't have to be strong or explosive to win the 100 meter dash in the 21st.
Man someone get the idiots out of here, show a sprinter that isn't strong and i'll show you a half ass athlete, go run a marthon if if you don't want strong, marathoners have muscular endurance not strength like a sprinter.
-
11-16-2005, 11:56 AM #49
I dont think he is on juice...his muscularity can be deceiving...some people have perfect muscle bellies and muscle shape....that make them look a lot bigger. I am not saying he had no muscle, but because of his perfect muscle shape he just looks bigger.
-
11-16-2005, 01:06 PM #50Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- L'Inghilterra
- Posts
- 1,611
Originally Posted by skiboy
-
11-16-2005, 01:11 PM #51Originally Posted by skiboy
I said big AND strong doesn't equal fast. Sprinters are strong in terms of strength to weight ratio, but are NOT big. They average 155-185lbs! If BIG AND STRONG equaled fast then Olympic lifters and power lifters should be the fastest things out there... And Carl Lewis should be slow! I find it interesting that you pull the “strong” out of the “big and strong” statement then ran with it…
You’re the idiot that came up with blacks are breed to be ""big and strong because of western slavery and that's why they are fast. I answered that you didn't account for the native blacks still in Africa that are fast.
Pull your head out your ass and quit the revisionist bullshit...ok. Trust me, when it comes to an understanding of speed I've got 10yrs. of experience that would run circles around your punkass! So, bring it on... sucka!
-
11-16-2005, 05:57 PM #52Associate Member
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- U.S.A.
- Posts
- 301
who ever said anything about western slavery, dude its not even worth getting into it with a wash up, 10 yrs out of experience, learn a lil bio/darwinism/muscle phys. man this isn't the time or place, i don't mess around sally's like you.
-
11-16-2005, 06:40 PM #53Originally Posted by skiboy
You make it look like the slave masters first found the gene for speed in blacks then scientifically breed blacks to be "big and strong," hence blacks have a Darwinian type of advantage for speed. Hell that shit has so much holes it looks like Swiss cheese and shows your lack of understanding on so many levels including the history of slavery.
The more you type the more your ignorance is showing... Keep it coming.
-
11-17-2005, 12:58 PM #54Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington state
- Posts
- 1,248
I'm going to say no. I think hes all natural. some people are just built like that.
I have a friend in the NFL, who played for the pats, now the bills. He was like that.
Just a freak of nature. He didnt work out but was jacked. Hes not huge by any means but for his age he had rediculas muscle. Hes like 6"0 200lbs now.
Im 6"5 285 so he dosent look big to me any longer.
-
11-17-2005, 01:03 PM #55Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 1,150
ur guys have too much time, GO TRAIN..
-
11-17-2005, 01:10 PM #56Originally Posted by buckeyefootball4
-
11-17-2005, 01:50 PM #57Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 1,150
Originally Posted by Lavinco
-
11-17-2005, 02:00 PM #58Originally Posted by buckeyefootball4
and when you're
-
11-17-2005, 02:13 PM #59Originally Posted by skiboy
If you want to try to clown on someone at least make sure you know what you are talking about. Dank you, come again!
-
11-18-2005, 08:33 AM #60
Not hijacking this thread- actually its already derailed. I'd just like to bring something up that might be a little twist to this scenario of Western slavery(i do not agree with this notion being discussed), anyways. Have you all ever read up on some of the tribes in africa that are HUGE- i'm talking 6-7 feet. Pretty much since the tribes never made contact with anyone else i guess there was no room for anything else but extreme height. Pretty obvious, like marrying a tall women- chances are you will have tall kids. The short genes ween themselves out(kinda darwenism).
The point i'm trying to make is that i believe humans adapt alot quicker then some of you think. Whats the reason we are all here right now, what brought us together? Hypertrophy.. We all want to build muscle. What does muscle do? It adapts, nearly overnight in some cases. Take for example the average height of men now, oppossed to 250 years ago. Its certaintly alot greater now. This notion of it takeing thousands of years to adapt seems like a fallacy in certain regards.
-
11-18-2005, 08:57 AM #61
This post is really weird but quite intresting i mean who cares if hes on or not !
we all make that decision wouldnt you agree
-
11-18-2005, 09:00 AM #62Originally Posted by scriptfactory
-
11-18-2005, 01:21 PM #63Originally Posted by UCFTransam
BTW, the growth in the average height of humans is due to nutritional changes and medical advancements. Nutrition is the most important factor in human growth.
-
12-15-2005, 10:04 PM #64New Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 2
Only he, his coach (or lab man) and the authoritues would know if he is on or not.
There is one aspect you dudes haven't thought about and that is that most athletes look huge when caught by a camera while in mid stride (or any action in any sport) because they are at full flex.
-
12-16-2005, 01:24 AM #65
Whatever he is doing he doing it right I hope this kid is in Canada so we can win a olyimpic gold medal.
-
12-16-2005, 04:13 PM #66Originally Posted by 100m champ
-
12-16-2005, 06:39 PM #67
J Sams yah yahhhhhhhhhhh go dog. The boy fast is hell......sheet. Short and muscular with a powerful/explosive build that most sprinters (good ones) have. Far from being huge or big.
-
12-16-2005, 06:41 PM #68Originally Posted by Nicky B
I hope your talking about the 16lber not the 12lb. Even with 16lb. Thats achievable without roids aswell.
-
12-16-2005, 11:37 PM #69Originally Posted by scriptfactory
-
12-17-2005, 12:15 AM #70VET
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 7,424
c'mon now, you guys really think he's juicing ?? for real ??
i guarantee you they're testing at some of those events. especially the US Junior nationals.
-
12-17-2005, 08:19 PM #71Originally Posted by KeyMastur
Where did you hear this?
-
12-18-2005, 02:20 AM #722/3 Deca 1/3 Test
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 7,964
Originally Posted by Lavinco
LMAO!
-
12-18-2005, 07:29 AM #73New Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 27
That´s one promising dude. I wish him the best in his future!
-
Sorry this is a stupid thread. You can't tell by a picture if someone is using (in most cases). Come on guys use your heads.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS