Results 1 to 34 of 34
-
08-03-2005, 09:48 AM #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- florida
- Posts
- 66
IGF-1LR3 intra muscluar or sub q injection?
Currently
Last edited by gq3856; 05-27-2008 at 09:00 AM.
-
08-03-2005, 05:06 PM #2
IM, sub-q tends to burn for me
JohnnyB
-
08-03-2005, 07:48 PM #3
I prefer IM as well....diluting with some vit B12.
-
08-03-2005, 08:33 PM #4supersteve Guest
I shoot sub-q and will switch to IM for my next cycle. Working great.
Doesn't burn sub-q if it's reconstituted with AA, BA is probably a diff story though.
-
08-04-2005, 03:26 AM #5Originally Posted by gq3856
-go IM with lr3 igf-1.
-29g 0.33x12.7mm.
-buy pre-mixed and ad some BW in the pin.
-if its your first run with igf then stick with 50mcg ed for 4 weeks.
-does'nt matter,wich ever you prefer.
-rodge
-
08-04-2005, 07:39 AM #6Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- florida
- Posts
- 66
thanks for the info
Rodge i thought ference i
Last edited by gq3856; 05-27-2008 at 09:00 AM.
-
08-04-2005, 09:14 AM #7
Ok guy dumb question of the day. I've looked and can't find anything on sub q injection. Is this just a standard injection procedure? What does it stand for?
Thanks
-
08-04-2005, 09:17 AM #8Originally Posted by gq3856
IM is the way to go with lr3 igf-1.
-rodge
-
08-04-2005, 09:19 AM #9Originally Posted by BuildaBeast
-rodge
-
08-04-2005, 05:03 PM #10Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 275
Originally Posted by BuildaBeast
http://www.fairview.org/healthlibrar...binasp_art.htm
-
08-04-2005, 07:14 PM #11supersteve Guest
^^ hmmm, i thought you injected the solution before letting go of the skinfold?
-
08-05-2005, 07:11 AM #12Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- florida
- Posts
- 66
If it is Im
IM (sucks)(guess im a baby lol) but
Last edited by gq3856; 05-27-2008 at 09:00 AM.
-
08-05-2005, 07:20 AM #13Originally Posted by gq3856
-rodge
-
08-05-2005, 08:31 AM #14Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- florida
- Posts
- 66
thanks for the info
But if i
Last edited by gq3856; 05-27-2008 at 09:00 AM.
-
08-05-2005, 08:42 AM #15Originally Posted by gq3856
-rodge
-
08-05-2005, 08:51 AM #16Originally Posted by rodge nl.There are 3 loves in my life: my wife, my English mastiffs, and my weightlifting....Man, my wife gets really pissed when I get the 3 confused...
A minimum of 100 posts and 45 days membership required for source checks. Source checks are performed at my discretion.
-
08-05-2005, 10:29 AM #17Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 85
Originally Posted by JohnnyB
I agree with Johnny here... I'M is the better way of admin. the igf... I no of folks doing it sub q. but they seem to complain of burning, and leaving red welps on there belly.
Thanks,
Omega Labs
-
08-05-2005, 11:02 AM #18New Member
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 27
Does the profits gain in force with igf1 are maintained in end?
under which name to find igf 1lr3?
-
08-05-2005, 12:12 PM #19Originally Posted by gq3856
-
08-05-2005, 04:42 PM #20Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- florida
- Posts
- 66
so wouldnt it be easier to shoot in your gluts or thighs then
and allhe qu
Last edited by gq3856; 05-27-2008 at 09:01 AM.
-
08-05-2005, 04:46 PM #21
Well more than one slin pin would be ideal.
-
08-05-2005, 04:47 PM #22
no cause thats were the skin and fat is mostly thicker and thus can't you shoot deep in the muscle.
-rodge
-
08-05-2005, 05:04 PM #23
By the way Rodge you've been nominated by a few of us in the Lounge for VET status.
-
08-05-2005, 07:08 PM #24supersteve Guest
Sorry to hijack but it's kind of related to this ...
For both igf-1 and GH intramuscular injections, should you continually rotate the site of injection? I mean will it become less effective if you keep injecting into the same muscle all the time? I get the feeling that the receptors could become burntout/resistant or watever and not properly uptake the solution.
Thanks.
-
08-06-2005, 01:33 AM #25Originally Posted by jerseyboy
-rodge
-
08-08-2005, 06:44 AM #26Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 127
so besides the burining from sq it really makes no difference as far as absorption goes right?
-
08-08-2005, 12:55 PM #27Originally Posted by jerseyboy
I'm with you all day on that one
-
08-08-2005, 11:36 PM #28Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- florida
- Posts
- 66
bump
Originally Posted by Mr. Punisher
Does it make a difference
-
08-09-2005, 07:01 AM #29Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 127
no I dont think so the same with GH some use it IM thinking that it will be absorbed better but it makes no difference!
-
08-09-2005, 08:04 AM #30Originally Posted by gq3856
probably not much but using it IM avoids getting welts and its absorpt quicker and thus faster higher bloodlevels and since your igf receptors are upregulated pwo it seems better to get it there were its needed quicker.
-rodge
-
08-09-2005, 09:43 AM #31Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 127
Originally Posted by rodge nl.
And one question Rodge if it is shot before workout it makes no diference right?
-
08-09-2005, 10:39 AM #32Originally Posted by Mr. Punisher
i think pwo is the way to go.
-rodge
-
08-09-2005, 12:30 PM #33Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 127
cool my brother!
-
08-14-2005, 09:12 AM #34Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- florida
- Posts
- 66
thanks for the info
Good looking out!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS