Results 41 to 73 of 73
Thread: My GH gut picture
-
11-12-2005, 05:41 PM #41
HAHAHAHA pregomorhp, classic .
-
11-12-2005, 06:07 PM #42Originally Posted by JohnnyB
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00104078
-
11-12-2005, 06:35 PM #43Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Here is an interview with the late Paul Borresen,talking about the next big thing, Histamine suppression.
AE: What's going to be the next big revelation is sports pharmacology for bodybuilders?
PB: Histamine suppression maybe. I don't know if it's a big revelation, but it's an exciting new development. Asking me the "big revelation" is like asking me the cure for cancer (laughing). This is one of the most interesting new things I know of. I also think short duration big doses of gear occasionally is another new development. But whenever you've got a new development, people certainly do try to shoot you down, don't they? But it is going on and it does work at the right times.
AE: Let's explore histamine suppression for a moment. How does this work?
PB: Well, I'm a very strong believer that allergies are the primary reason why we don't grow or why we age. Because our bodies become more and more unable to recognize itself, or starts to think itself is an enemy. A lot of diseases like senility are examples of this, as we get older we start to attack our own brain, Graves disease where we attack our own endocrine system, these diseases develop as we get older and develop as our bodies start to slip. That's really why we age.
I always look at what's stopping this person from growing, not what will make this person grow. The first most important thing for any bodybuilder is to have a cytotoxic test to find out every food he's allergic to and remove it. That's just simple logic. Allergies occur in times of excess. Bodybuilders live for excess, we force-feed, we overeat, we create more of these reactions in our bodies. The mechanism is histamine, the body creates histamine in an allergic response to try to fight any change in the body. People with allergic reactions take anti-histamines, or histamine suppression. Now, I'm saying that histamine is a control, it's something that holds us back as bodybuilders. It's a defense mechanism that can go wrong. So when you push the gear up or when you push the food up, I find that if you do a cytotoxic test on someone when they're dieting and then you do one on them when they're force feeding they'll end up allergic to a whole host of things when they're force feeding. So I would then use histamine suppression. At times of excess, when you're pushing the course, when you're eating hard, when you're trying to grow, you hit a sticking point, by incorporating an anti-histamine you'll find that growth comes easier.
AE: That's interesting.
PB: It works. But I'm sure when this interview goes out, I'm sure everyone will tell me how suicidal it is. You have an idea, and it automatically gets attacked. And I'm not always right. However, when I am right, everyone else had the idea first. That's why I like people like Dan Duchaine, I admire the guy because he speaks his mind. And he's not always right, but he's been right enough times that he deserves a lot of credit. He thought of things like DNP , he came up with the idea of using Cytradren, not me. I'd never even heard of it until one day I saw it in one of his articles and I decided to try it out on my people. You know, I coach a lot of people, and if someone says something works, I see if it works. I often try it out on myself first, or I've got a bodybuilder that I'll go to and say to him, "I don't know if this stuff works, do you want to try it with me?" And you'd be surprised how many people are out there just stupid enough to say yes! (laughing)
AE: Dan also knows when to admit that he's wrong. [Editors note: Remember, when this interview was conducted, Dan Duchaine was still alive]
PB: He does, and I like that. How can he be right all the time, how can anyone? But people seem to forget when he's right and remember when he's wrong. That's not fair, that's not seeing the whole picture and the contributions he's made. If I ever made a contribution in my life to bodybuilding as much as the Underground Steroid Handbook made, that is the biggest single contribution to our sport because it brought knowledge to everyday people. All of a sudden it wasn't a few elite people in the world that knew what to do, everyone did!
AE: I know you've worked with a lot of elite level bodybuilders. Generally what kind of dosages have you seen being used at that level?
PB: I get accused of naming names all the time, but that's basically a case of people naming names on my behalf. I never coached Dorian, he used to phone me up and ask for my advice, but I never coached him. I certainly never coached Ernie [Taylor] either, or Lee Priest for that matter. I met Lee for the first time at my seminar, he did me the honor of turning up. But, I see some individuals, top amateurs and pros, using very high dosages for a long time. And it concerns me, because whether people like it or not, I'm doing a research study with the University of Glamorgan here in the UK. You'd better get the name of that University right! Anyway, I'm working with a Professor Bruce Davis, he's heading up the team with myself, and we are simply taking subjects than have been on steroids for 20 years or more and looking at them, echogram, cardiogram, testing their fitness, blood tests, everything. It takes a full day for the protocol.
AE: What are you finding?
PB: The first 14 people we looked at had cardiac damage. Now that frightened the shit out of me. I can quote this because this is accurate and anyone can check this with Glamorgan, 4 of the subject are probably going to need operations within the next 10 years. Now I did not expect the damage to come out in the cardiac area, I expected it to come out in the liver and the kidneys. Now we're going to produce a paper and I was expecting it to prove that after 20 years of steroid use , everyone was alright. And that isn't the case. After 20 years, 50% of the people were perfectly health, 40% had damage that was repairable, and 10% had irreversible cardiac damage. That's the results so far. That's a bit scary, isn't it?
AE: It is.
PB: There's no arguing it either. I know lots of bodybuilders, and I'll take the people I talk to or coach and ask them if they'd like to go along. They get a complete check over, blood test for free. One of the members of my staff, Bill Bingham, he's only 22, and he has elevated cardiac enzyme at age 22. He's now come off everything under my advice. In 10 years time, he would have been one of those 10%. We've got a 27-year old who will need a heart bypass operation before he's 30. It frightened the life out of me because it's hardcore evidence. It's the first quality research into this that I know about.
AE: How many subjects have been tested so far?
PB: I've only seen the results from 30 subjects, they've actually tested more. The full study will be 200 subjects by the time the paper is written.
AE: When do you expect that to be out?
PB: The paper should be out in 16 weeks. I don't want thousands of people emailing the University of Glamorgan asking for this reseach, but as a magazine you could. They'd happily provide it to you. They'll happily tell you about it. I don't think they'll want to go into exacting details with you because as scientists they need to complete the study, but they will at least confirm the study is ongoing and that the indications are not what we expected. We actually intended to prove that anabolic steroid use was perfectly healthy and all this cardiac stuff has come up. [Editors note: After I transcribed this portion of the tape, I contacted the University to inquire about the test Paul is referring too. Nothing has been confirmed as of yet]
AE: I look forward to seeing that study. Let's talk about training and nutrition for a bit, I don't believe anyone that interviews you ever takes the time to get your views on those subjects. They always focus on drugs with you.
PB: They always do when I get interviewed, and it quite honestly annoys me. Drugs are not really what matters, they're not everything are they.
AE: Well, you know why that is, most people would rather read about drugs.
PB: I don't know about the people reading the magazines, but publishers definitely like the more controversial stuff.
AE: For training, I know you really advocate pre-exhaustion and rest-pause style systems. What are the advantages of training in this fashion?
PB: I go back to the science. Were trying to make muscle fibers thicker to make our bodies bigger. Right? That's what we're doing. The body recruits muscle fibers, and this is in the scientific literature for everyone to see, in reverse order. It recruits the small ones first, they're shorter and stronger. So when we train a 6 to 8 rep set, we only train about 30% of our fibers, and these are going to be the shortest and smallest ones. Therefore, even if we doubled their thickness, we're not going to see huge increases in size. We need to get down to the big, thick, weak fibers, which are only worked in the latter stages of a set or workout. So, it's pure science. When I, or you, are doing a set, we're initially only using the small, strong fibers. As you get weaker, you start to bring into play the larger fibers. So, as you put the weight down and pick another weight up, you're getting deeper. The reason why I like drop-setting, is because by the time you get down to the bar, or using no weight at all, that's when the weakest fibers in your body, which happen to be the largest, are getting hit. And therefore, you're gaining the most size. You have to work down through the muscle fibers, I actually take a workout as a way to recruit all the muscle fibers in a given area, not as an objective to lift weight. The weights immaterial, I don't care if I have to lift egg boxes to get big, I simply want to get big.
AE: One of the biggest problems I face is convincing people that the weights they use are not as important as the fashion in which they are lifting and the intensity while doing so.
PB: As you know, I have a back injury, I can no longer do a 400-500 lb bench press. So, I'll do 50-60 reps on flyes, perhaps a triple-drop set of flyes, and then do a 200-300 lb bench press. By then, I'm tired and pre-exhausted. And yes, the guy next to me in the gym is probably looking at me saying, "I can do that", but he couldn't do it after doing what I did. Even Simon, [Cohen] and this man is big and massive, called me up to day to tell me that his chest has been sore for the last 5 days. It told me, "Paul, it's awesome!!!" And this is Mr. Universe getting really excited. He's telling me that he's got a whole new way to train and that he loves it. Now we're planning on putting another 20 lbs on Simon just by improving his training. Here I am at 260-ish, my training partner is 240-ish, and by the end of the workout, we're picking Simon up off the floor. We only did 4 sets, and by the last set, Simon's ready to die. But he loved it, he loved it. He's my star of tomorrow.
AE: You take a Simon Cohen. How do you advocate someone the size of a Simon Cohen eat during the offseason?
PB: Macronutrients. I'm concerned with Simon getting 400 g of quality protein down. I'm concerned that Simon doesn't get too fat, within the confines of that, it really doesn't matter what he does. If Simon wants a pizza, I say Simon, have a pizza. I'm more concerned that if his diet is too clean, he cannot eat enough. Also, what the hell are we going to do to clean it up? What are we going to take out if he's living on turkey breasts? My answer is, when you're trying to eat more than you need, which you have to do to get bigger, you've got to use whatever food you can eat. There's only fat, protein, and carbs, there's only fuel. So, as long as their enough protein, and we supplement his diet with 200 g of protein a day, and he eat plenty of steak, turkey, chicken, lean red meat, things like this. He's consuming some source of protein every 2.5 hours, and in between meals, he's having small protein shakes, 10-15 grams of protein. We're trying to keep a constant blood supply of all the amino acids needed for muscle growth. I start my seminars with, "Close your eyes, and imagine a sphere floating in space. It's spinning like the earth, and outside that sphere is the ocean. Running through that ocean are tubes of liquid. Well, that sphere is the muscle cell, and the ocean is the lymph that surrounds it and the tubes are the blood. To build muscle, you've got to get all the amino acids into the muscle cell. To do that, you've got to get them into the lymph, to do that you've got to get them into the blood. And to do that, you've got to get them into the stomach, and to do that you've got to them into the stomach you've got to eat. There are 22 amino acids that you should be eating every 3 hours."
That's how I start my seminars, with those words. That's what I believe. Nutrition is first about getting those amino acids in, then it's about providing enough energy. That means eating, and eat what the hell you bloody like
AE: Do you often find that people stop making progress because they're not consuming enough calories?
PB: Definitely. It's definitely more that than simply not enough protein. It's not enough calories, therefore, the nutrition that's required to build muscle is going to be diverted to providing basic energy needs which is always going to be a priority over muscle growth.
AE: The reason why I ask is simply because that's what I see every day. When I evaluate people's diets their simply not consuming enough calories.
PB: Right, they're living on turkey breasts.
AE: The whole thing has been created by the supplement companies which would have you believe that these athletes live on rice and chicken and eat clean year round. In addition to that, they consume copious amounts of supplements. In reality, this simply isn't happening.
PB: You know I own a supplement company. The word supplement is the key here. You should eat lots of food, a diet rich in protein, fats, and carbs and then add supplements on top. People who replace their meals with MRP's and things, they're never going to grow. Eat the MRP as well as the meal. That's what an MRP is for, to drink with your steak and eggs. I'm going to be hit for saying this, but all my people have steak and eggs before bed every night. The reason for that is this. In the wild, when a lion eats a zebra, it doesn't only absorb 30 grams of that food, I mean, it only eats once a week. You can extrapolate this to man, we didn't eat every three hours. When we eat, we don't only absorb 30 grams, if we did, we be the size of mice. The fact is that the amount of nutrients we absorb from our food is largely dependent on the kind of food we eat. If you eat red meat and eggs, it's very slowly absorbed. You can eat 150 grams of protein in this fashion and it's going to take all night to be absorbed. That way you're covering yourself throughout the night and you always sleep deep on proteins and fats. It's natural to eat and sleep. So, all my clients will have a big steak and eggs before going to bed, that way I know their muscle cells are getting a constant infusion of amino acids throughout the night. I used to advocate that my clients wake up and eat in the middle of the night. Now I prefer to have them simply eat a high protein moderate fat meal before going to bed.
goose4...
-
11-12-2005, 07:07 PM #44
Nice post goose!
~Pinnacle~
-
11-12-2005, 07:31 PM #45
very nice post.... good readin material.. Printed it off, read it at work, and now I'm telling you "great read"....
-
11-12-2005, 09:26 PM #46
not sure but isn't Paul Borresen dead?
-
11-12-2005, 10:05 PM #47Junior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 53
yeah massive heart attack,go figure
-
11-12-2005, 10:14 PM #48Originally Posted by JAMIE720
-
11-13-2005, 09:16 AM #49Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Originally Posted by JAMIE720
Before making a stupid statment like `go figure` make sure you know your facts.He did not die of ASS USE! So in the furture please do not make these comments and give people the wrong idea!!!!!
goose4.......
-
11-13-2005, 09:55 AM #50Junior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 53
Hey Goose who said he died of aas use,I didnt.I Thought I read a while back he had a heart attack.Ive been using aas for the last 6 years and wouldnt want to give anybody the "wrong" impression since Im currently on probably more shit than you.Cheers.
-
11-13-2005, 10:10 AM #51Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Originally Posted by JAMIE720
I got the wrong idea with your comment- take care dude.
goose4......
-
11-13-2005, 10:34 AM #52
i never thought he die cause AAS , I thought he die cause the steak and eggs before bed time
evrything cool guys
I remenber i bought hes book the red one forgot the name of it ,it was so hard to read cause the pages were red inside (if im not mystaking)
seriously anyone knows why he had a hardattack at the ages of 31 thats young broLast edited by ajfina; 11-13-2005 at 10:36 AM.
-
11-13-2005, 10:58 AM #53
Wow those pictures are brutal. Thats why i love arnolds build... his waist was what 29inchs or something like that
Originally Posted by oswaldosalcedo
-
11-13-2005, 11:30 AM #54
For every BB with gh gut I can think of 100 diabetics with a hugh gut from taking insulin . I am not saying that the gh did not play any role in his distended gut but it certainly was not the only factor. I am sure 5000 calories a day did not help either. Check out my GH gut under the thread Ansomone results.
-
11-13-2005, 11:49 AM #55Originally Posted by maxxwell
~Pinnacle~
-
11-13-2005, 12:12 PM #56Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Originally Posted by ajfina
NM: First, Paul, how are you feeling? I heard that you suffered an accident recently.
PB: Yes, I took a nasty fall and was laid up for four-and-a-half months. It required major surgery. For a long time, I was in a full body brace. While in the hospital, I went down to 170 pounds! I recovered quickly but, of course, I was receiving glutamine, Deca , and growth hormone ! It was no problem getting it into the hospital. Since then, I've entered some area contests and won, but my goal is to come back from having a broken back and win the Nationals.
NM: Any innovative substances that you've been experimenting with?
PB: Whenever there's anything new, I'll try it! You know of the new oils used to inflate a muscle, like Synthol? Well, I've put together a combination of oils in my lab that contains nandrolone , benzyl alcohol, and silica gel. It provides a permanent growth due to the fact that the silica coats the muscle fibers. But it also gives you 300 milligrams of gear per milliliter. It's really amazing, but it can be overdone, as in the case of Ernie Taylor. Have you seen his triceps?
NM: Of course. They're so freaky, they look "fake."
PB: They don't look right. That's an example of an overdone local effect. As far as anything else new, I've been experimenting with prostaglandins since '95. When I won the Northwest Championship, I had six milliliters of Cavajet, which is something that's used to get an erection. But I didn't need it there, so I put it in my arms and shoulders! I've been working with people using Prostaglandins before going to bed at night, and we've seen phenomenal results. They can also be used to provide "local" enlargement. I use it to smooth out my symmetry.
NM: Were there any side effects?
PB: I don't feel that the claims of bad side effects are all that genuine. If you look at the risks and side effects of pharmacology as a whole, prostaglandins fall pretty low down on the list.
NM: What's the typical drug regime of some of the people you coach?
PB: I'm coaching people who use two thousand milligrams of gear each day. They're very big. If you're going to take that level of anabolics, I believe in very short courses—thirty days, at the most, before your body realizes what happened. I'm a firm believer that receptor sites up-regulate. When you do about 5000 milligrams a week, they respond unbelievably. People are going up a pound a day for 18 days straight.
NM: So by using super-physiologic dosages and keeping cycles short, you won't need to increase the dosages with each successive cycle?
PB: You should need less! It's like training. A newcomer does 16 sets and makes gains. The more advanced someone is, the less amount of sets they need to do. I only do about four or five sets. I'm helping Ian Harrison prepare for the Arnold, and he needs even fewer sets per workout.
NM: How long of a wait do you recommend before starting another course?
PB: At least 15 days, which comes to 21 days after your last shot. But if you wait too much longer than three weeks, you're going backwards in your progress. You'll spend time "making up" for what you've lost, even if you use anti-catabolics.
NM: Tell me a little about your company. How did it get started?
PB: A few years back, my wife and I started a company called Chemical Nutrition. Unfortunately, we took on a partner of dubious integrity. It got so bad that he threatened to put me in a body bag! I ended that relationship and started Biohazard. We've been growing very quickly in the UK, and I'm glad to say that my ex-partner's business is declining badly. I don't follow a business "strategy." I focus on culture. I want to make the best products. I won't bullshit anyone or let anyone work for me who isn't honest. I have an MBA degree, and my business philosophy is not to build an empire; rather, we want to build many castles. I want to make money, but I have to look at myself in the mirror every day. I have to respect what I see.
NM: What is the most unique Biohazard product?
PB: We have something called Ravenger 5, which is a special grade of protein powder. It has the exact amino acid make-up, in proprietary order, of human muscle—the only product of its kind. It took a lot of work getting the proper ratios required. We finally came up with a combination of whey, egg albumin, soy isolate, and wheat gluten. The glutamine is not a free form because protein works best in a natural peptide chain. I'm not a big fan of aminos in free form.
NM: You've been outspoken in the past about professional bodybuilders. You made some statements recently concerning Paul Dillett...
PB: I have nothing personal against him. He doesn't train all that hard. He's very lazy. I don't like it when bodybuilders rely on massive amounts of gear and don't train correctly or look after their health. Everyone I work with uses high androgens, and we take certain precautions. I have them all on glycerin. It reduces water and blood pressure. It's an indigestible carb, which causes water to be drawn from the surrounding tissues like the skin. It also increases vascularity.
NM: What is your current stack?
PB: For the first ten days, I take 1000 mg of Sustanon a day. Days 11 to 20, I take 800 mg of Deca, 400 mg of Primobolan , and 600 mg of test propionate a day. Days 21 to 30, I do 400 mg of propionate, 200 mg of Winstrol , and four of my Triple X capsules, which are a homemade combination of Dinatropinol, T3, and oral insulin . I also take a 30-IU shot of insulin every time I eat a meal.
NM: Gee, is that all?
PB: That's what it takes. I want to make the most massive gains possible. I've gained 94 pounds in the last five months. Oh, I almost forgot—I also use growth hormone four days at a time, which is the way a child produces it, in four-day spurts. It doesn't work as well if you stay on it all the time. Consistent use suppresses your natural GH secretion, plus you build up a tolerance to its effects. I use 12 IUs of GH each day I use it.
NM: No cycling down the dosages of the steroid stack?
PB: No, I just stop. I don't feel that there's much benefit from cycling down. By distancing the shots and the half-life of the drugs, a "cycle down" occurs naturally. I want to clean out as soon as possible. When people stick in low levels of gear in order to "bridge," they're not clearing anything.
NM: Any anti-estrogens?
PB: Aminoglutathiamide is terrific when used the last ten days before a show. It makes you freaky hard. It's a pretty risky drug, however. The ACTH [Adrenal Corticol Tropic Hormone] kickback can create a bigger problem than what you started with. It's a gamble. I use Tamoxifen , 40 mg a day before bed, if I start to get too puffy.
NM: I noticed that you don't use any orals.
PB: For what I use, it wouldn't be healthy. I would hate to take 2,000 mg of 2-mg Anavar tablets!
NM: Definitely not practical. No veterinarian steroids ?
PB: No. One thing I've learned from my studies in pharmacology is that mammalian physiology may be similar, but there are species differences. A veterinarian drug is developed through veterinarian research by companies that design it for animals. There aren't any studies of their effectiveness in humans. You need much higher doses than the proper human equivalent. A dog's testosterone would work in a human, just not as effectively. Since I can't control what's compatible and what isn't, I won't use them.
NM: Is there really any way of detecting counterfeits?
PB: It's so easy to fake the ampoules and boxes. Whenever you see an exposé of what is fake and how a "real" steroid should look, the counterfeiters just copy the "real" one. There are a few tricks. For example, Primo shouldn't fall out when you turn the box upside down.
NM: Unless the dealer has pulled the vial out a few times.
PB: That's a good point. In that case, it could be real, but you'd think it was fake. There's just no way of knowing. Some guys over here copied the pink pentagon Thai D-bol and put 5 mg of clenbuterol in them.
NM: Five milligrams?! My God, did anyone die?
PB: There were nine reported deaths. I took one, and went into the hospital.
NM: What's your present association with Dorian Yates?
PB: I take a phone call from Dorian every couple of weeks about technical matters. He'll usually have me come down to his house and ask me about various drugs. I showed him how to use growth hormone and IGF. I helped him with his DNP usage for his last Olympia show. I can honestly say that DNP can produce a condition that's unbelievable, but you've got to get it right! I find it horrendous. My temperature went up to 103 degrees. I was sick, and it felt like I was on fire.
NM: So in the future, will you just stick to using clen ?
PB: No, I'd still use the DNP. I'll just suffer. It can make you lose five pounds of fat in a week. My waist is 31 inches. That's also one benefit of being in the hospital. I had to have two ribs removed, which made my waist slimmer. Cher had a similar surgical procedure done on her to produce a longer torso look. I love it!
NM: What is the best steroid, in your opinion?
PB: If I had to recommend just one, I'd have to say that Deca has the best risk to benefit ratio. But my absolute favorite drug is Primobolan.
NM: I love Primo, too. People think it's weak because it doesn't produce water weight. Deca, on the other hand, bloats me as much as straight testosterone.
PB: You're telling me! Deca is very bloating. Not all tests cause as much water retention. But some people seem to go for that bloat, don't they? They equate it with more size.
NM: What drugs don't you like?
PB: I don't like testosterone cypionate . It's a very raw drug. It also makes you depressed. Anadrol is a shit drug. The fact that it's a 50-mg tablet tells you how weak it is.
NM: I've often made that same point, but it's amazing how many people don't "get" it. The low-dosed drugs, like Winstrol, build the most muscle.
PB: Winstrol is a very potent tissue-building drug in the truest sense! As far as effectiveness in building muscle, 50 mg of Winny tabs will blow 50 mg of Anadrol right out of the water!
NM: Thank you! It's nice to know I'm not alone in that evaluation.
PB: It's so obvious. Anadrol is designed to correct anemia. It builds red blood cells. It does not build muscle. It may help at the end of a course to "fill up" on blood, which may help you to hold on to the gained weight. It's a poor man's EPO [erythropoietin]. If I wanted to make a lot of money, I'd design a drug and call it Super-bol 5,000,000! Everyone will think it's really strong!
People have so much of this stuff wrong. They think that Primo's weak, when it's actually very strong. They say that Anadrol is powerful, when it's actually very weak. Cypionate is more popular than enanthate , but the enanthate is terrific and cyp is crap. They draw conclusions without really understanding basic pharmacology. People should be using the finer, sophisticated drugs like Primo and Winstrol, not cypionates and the veterinarian products. It's so absurd!
NM: Does it make sense not to stack too many different steroids?
PB: All steroids compete with each other. That's why I say to take Sus for ten days, then Deca for ten days, and so on. Proviron is thought to be an anti-estrogen, but it's really an anti-androgen. Clomid is an underrated anti-estrogen.
NM: How does Clomid differ from Cyclofenil ?
PB: Cyclofenil is a weak estrogen. Even if it competes for estrogen sites, some might get through. Clomid removes the estrogen, so it's much more effective.
NM: Who's the most outrageous steroid abuser you've ever known?
PB: I'd love to say, but I can't.
NM: You don't have to name names.
PB: Okay, the craziest thing that I've ever seen was done by a British pro. He takes a 100-ml bottle and sticks whatever he can get into it, no matter what. Deca, cyp, Equipoise , anything! He'll then take a five-ml shot of that every three hours.
NM: Wow!
PB: He'll also put in ten mg of propionate every day into specific body parts. He doesn't consider that a part of his stack because it's "locating." He does a total of at least 60 shots a day.
NM: That's mind-boggling. How does he look?
PB: Pretty ****ing awesome!
NM: No doubt! Paul, are there any last comments that you'd like to make?
PB: I just want to be able to provide accurate information and sell products that I know are effective. My motto is, "Ignorance kills—let's kill ignorance." I honestly believe that if we give the people the right information, we'll build this sport. There are a lot of assholes with too much power in our sport!
NM: I agree. We're doing what we can on this end. I hope that you'll be able to be a regular contributor to Testosterone. Your expertise is invaluable, and I'm sure that our readers will enjoy what you have to say.
PB: I'd love to write for you guys, and providing honest information to people who care is the right reason for doing so.
NM: Paul, I know that there's still so much we could talk about. Let's do this again sometime.
PB: That'd be great.
Whew! Did anybody out there get hurt? I'm sure that I don't have to offer a disclaimer to the drug dosages that Paul has advocated. This is obviously for the most advanced bodybuilder with extensive experience in chemical assistance. Nevertheless, Paul's comprehension of the subject is unquestionably vast, and I'm sure that he's left more than a few people with their heads spinning.
Class dismissed.
goose4...
-
11-13-2005, 12:25 PM #57Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Originally Posted by Pinnacle
goose4......
-
11-13-2005, 01:35 PM #58Originally Posted by goose4
I can't say if I gained a pound off it,for the fact I'm on cycle now.
BUT,2 weeks in on the cycle we(my trainer,myself,and nutritionist)noticed I was getting a bloated look in my abdominal region.My BF wasn't going up at all.At first we thought it was HGH.So I had blood work done to see what my IGF levels were and if I was possibly converting too much IGF-2.My IGF levels were very high,but nothing alarming in the sense it would be causing issues of abdominal growth.I can't put my finger on anything else that could have caused this.Also,I stopped the LR3 IGF-1 4 days prior to running the bloodwork,so we could get an accurate reading on levels directly tied to HGH.The other thing is,I don't run slin every day.Only on training days which are every other day.I train twice daily on those days and run 12 iu's PWO in the AM and then again in the pm.Seems as though my stomach doesn't look as bad on my "off" days.But it still has a somewhat bloated look to it.
I'm totally uneducated on this,and need to research and ask some ppl why slin does this.Some have said to me it will go away after I cease the slin(which is in 6 more days)so I'll see what happens.In the mean time I want to find out why slin has this effect on some ppl.
~Pinnacle~
-
11-13-2005, 02:27 PM #59Originally Posted by oswaldosalcedo
-
11-13-2005, 06:13 PM #60Originally Posted by Pinnacle
slin have nothing to do with big gut.
i have used 10-15 ius 2-3 times daily.
read this:
…..In conclusion, exogenous IGF-I administered at physiological
doses did not exert marked effects on body wt
gain, carcass dimensions, or body composition in intact,
growing, and well-fed yearling sheep. It had some marked
endocrine and metabolic effects, however, including
suppression of plasma insulin , IGFBP-2, and induced
hyperglycaemia. Marked splenomegaly was also noted.
These changes must be borne in mind in considering any
possible therapeutic use of IGF-I. While IGF-I treatment
in this study did not cause a major somatogenic response
in well fed normally growing animals, higher doses of
IGF-I may be more effective. However, under more severe
conditions such as undernutrition, when GH resistance
occurs (44) IGF-I is a more effective anabolic agonist…..
Organ- control- igf 1 treated
Heart 232.0 +/- 11.0 ------- 230.4 +/ 10.4
Liver 1005.9 +/- 48.5 ----- 1027.0 +/- 45.9
Spleen 78.8 +/- 4.6 ------ 114.6 +/- 4.4 (50 %)
Lungs 502.6 +/- 29.9 ------ 515.1+/- 28.3
Kidneys 131.8 +/- 5.3 ------ 145.6 +/- 5.0
and:
Differences in the association of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-I variants with rat, sheep, pig, human and chicken plasma-binding proteins.
Lord AP, Bastian SE, Read LC, Walton PE, Ballard FJ.
Child Health Research Institute, North Adelaide, South Australia.
"Associations between labelled insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF-binding proteins in plasma have been compared in the rat, sheep, human, pig and chicken. The IGFs tested were recombinant human IGF-I, the truncated variant, des(1-3)IGF-I, and LR3IGF-I, an extended form that had been engineered so as to minimize interactions with IGF-binding proteins. Marked species differences were demonstrated, notably that the IGF-I variants which exhibited extremely weak binding in rat plasma bound significantly in plasma from the other species. This result was shown both by size-exclusion chromatography of labelled IGFs added to plasma, in which the extent of variant IGF-I binding decreased in the order sheep > human > pig = chicken > rat, and by competition for labelled IGF-I binding in vitro, in which the order was pig = chicken > sheep > human > rat. Notwithstanding these differences, the two IGF-I variants showed only slight between-species binding differences when tested with purified rat, sheep and human IGF-binding protein-3. Ligand blotting experiments with plasma from the five species similarly showed a consistent pattern in that IGF-I binding was much greater than des(1-3)IGF-I binding, which in turn was greater than LR3IGF-I binding"
less binding,more powerful.
THEN, HGH AND LR3 AT SUPRAPHISIOLOGICAL DOSES ARE THE CULPRIT.
high doses daily.Last edited by oswaldosalcedo; 11-13-2005 at 07:06 PM.
-
11-13-2005, 06:42 PM #61Originally Posted by Pinnacle
Roid gut from LR3 IGF1, IGF 1, IGF 2.:
Roid gut from LR3 IGF1, IGF 1, IGF 2.
------------------------------------------
and hooker is banned ,cant post.
-
11-13-2005, 06:45 PM #62Originally Posted by oswaldosalcedo
~Pinnacle~
-
11-13-2005, 07:06 PM #63Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 924
In reply to goose.
Paul borresen was know for exagerating the truth, Dorian said that he never worked with him during his competitive career. Dorian said the first time he met him was when Paul owned the supplement company biohazard which Yates and Kerry Kayes later took over and is now Chemical Nutrition.
As for his physique he had outrageous claims he once told Trevor Smith that he would guest pose for him and that he was 300 pounds and 10% BF needless to say he never showed up citing injury Trevor Smith fell out with him over this.
Truth be told the one and only time he did compete he was 200 pounds on stage. In a local novice event that he won.
He did have some interesting ideas and certainly knew what he was talking about, but you would be best not taking everything he says literally.
-
11-13-2005, 07:16 PM #64Originally Posted by Pinnacle
you are using aas mega doses, aas increases igf too.
test 3 gr daily and fina and anything i said you, before.
Originally Posted by Pinnacle
Go for it bro.I'm running 1.5g Fina with 120 mcgs IGF,and other goodies as well.
You'll like the IGF/Fina combo.You'll really lean out and put on size as well.
~Pinnacle~
---------------------------------------------------
changing parameters ?
pinnacle at 10-22-2005, 12:41 PM
2g enanthate
1g Fina
800 mgs EQ
100 mgs masteron EOD
8 iu's ED HGH..straight!no off days!
of course slin,but I'll be adding IGF at 100 mcgs ED next week to compliment the slin...I'll run slin with it 3 weeks(since I have a week in already)..then break from both,and resume 1 month later.
at:
slin again
pinnacle at 10-22-2005, 12:41 PM
igf-1 and fina?
post n 7
supersteve
Fina is the same as test in that it will make your muscles more sensitive to igf-1.
juicejoe
Christ thats some high doses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinnacle
Running 2.75g Test wkly.....sleep is OK,not great though.
~Pinnacle~
you are near, mr olympia contenders
post n 14
next week?
3-4 gr enanthate
2 fina
1.5-2 gr EQ
200 mcg LR3 ?
etc............?
-
11-13-2005, 07:23 PM #65Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 924
Interview with Trevor Smith and
Ian Harrison of Biohazard USA
by Jason Mueller
As many of you are probably aware, Biohazard USA recently split from Paul Borreson. I was informed of this the morning of Tuesday, October 19, after reading several emails directing me to Biohazard's web site. There I found a shocking article alleging a long pattern of lies and deception on the part of Paul Borreson, written by his former partners in the Biohazard USA venture. After reading this article, I immediately called Trevor Smith, the man behind the scenes at Biohazard USA. The following interview is a result of my conversation with Trevor. Although our initial conversation was brief, perhaps 20 minutes, I was left with a few indelible impressions. Trevor struck me as a man of great integrity. I expected to speak with a man filled with rage and venom, lashing out at Borreson at every opportunity. What I heard was a man who was deeply hurt, saddened by the events that had transpired. His primary concern, after the obvious welfare of his family, was moving past these events and developing Biohazard USA into the company he always has envisioned. We'll let Trevor and Ian tell the rest of the story.
JM: I know a lot of people have probably read the article on Biohazard and we're reprinting it at the end of this interview. What can the both of you add to the article in regards to what's happened between Paul and yourselves?
TREVOR: BASICALLY THAT WE WERE LED TO BELIEVE MANY THINGS AND THAT 99.9% OF WHAT WE WERE TOLD WAS NOT THE TRUTH.
IAN: PAUL BORRESEN IS A VERY INTENSE PERSON WITH A GREAT DEAL OF KNOWLEDGE, BUT DUE TO HIS EXTREME ATTEMPTS TO DO 1000 THINGS AT ONCE HE SPREAD HIMSELF SO THIN THAT HE ENDED UP IN A VERY MIXED UP STATE MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY AND IN HIS PERSONAL LIFE, SO HE WINDS UP LETTING DOWN THE VERY PEOPLE THAT STOOD BY HIM AND LITERALLY HELD HIM UP DURING HIS BAD TIMES.
JM: Can you tell me a little bit about how you both came to be involved with Paul?
TREVOR: I CONTACTED PAUL IN THE FALL OF 1998 AFTER READING HIS FIRST BOOK. I WANTED TO EXCHANGE IDEAS ON WAYS TO USE PHARMACEUTICALS SINCE I WAS ABOUT TO EMBARK ON MY FIRST COURSE. BASICALLY THIS ESCALATED TO HIM WANTING ME TO FORM BIOHAZARD USA. AFTER RESEARCHING THE PRODUCTS AND TRYING THEM OUT, I REALIZED THAT THEY WERE UNIQUE AND THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE WOULD BENEFIT FROM THEM.
IAN: I’VE KNOWN PAUL BORRESEN FOR APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS AND SEEN MANY OF HIS UPS AND DOWNS. I GENUINELY LIKE THE REAL PAUL BORRESEN, BUT THE REAL PAUL BORRESEN (WHO HAS GREAT POTENTIAL MENTALLY) IS SEEN LESS AND LESS THESE DAYS. HIS BASIC MORAL PRINCIPLES, WHICH HE SWEARS TO LIVE BY AND EXPECTS HIS FRIENDS TO ALSO, ARE NOT AS TRUTHFUL AS HE MAY THINK. I FIRST GOT TO KNOW PAUL WHEN HE AND ANOTHER SUPPLEMENT SUPPLIER FOUNDED CHEMICAL NUTRITION. I THEN SAW THE WHOLE FEUD BETWEEN KERRY KAYES AND PAUL BORRESEN TAKE PLACE (SEEING BOTH SIDES OBJECTIVELY). BASICALLY KERRY HELPED FINANCE PAUL’S IDEAS AND CHEMICAL WAS BORN. IT ENDED THE SAME WAY OUR RELATIONSHIP ENDED WITH HIM AND FOR THE VERY SAME REASONS.
JM: I've read a lot of what Paul has written and watched one of his seminars. He seemed very intelligent and inspirational. I know now that he's claiming to have a Ph.D. and refers to himself as Dr. Paul BORRESEN. Do you have any knowledge as to the legitimacy of the degrees he claims?
TREVOR: NO THAT IS THE PROBLEM. WE WENT AROUND PROMOTING HIM AS A PHARMACOLOGIST AND BIOCHEMIST AND NOW A DOCTOR, BUT WHENEVER WE ASKED ABOUT HIS CREDENTIALS AND DEGREES THEY COULD NEVER BE FOUND…WHEN OTHER PEOPLE WOULD ASK, HE WOULD TELL THEM THAT HE IS TIRED OF HAVING TO PROVE HIMSELF TO EVERYONE AND REFUSES TO GIVE IN TO PEOPLE DEMANDING TO SEE HIS DEGREES AND THAT ALL THAT MATTERS IS THAT HE KNOWS HE IS LEGITIMATE.
IAN: NO! ONLY HIS WORD.
JM: When did you first start realizing that something was wrong and what finally caused you to split?
TREVOR: AROUND THE TIME OF THE USA SEMINAR. HE MISSED 3 PLANE FLIGHTS THAT WERE BOOKED FOR HIM AND WAS REFUSING TO COME OVER CLAIMING HIS BACK WAS BAD, YET THE SEMINAR HAD BEEN PLANNED FOR 3 MONTHS AT A PERSONAL COST TO ME OF $3000 NOT INCLUDING THE PLANE TICKETS PAUL CHARGED ON MY ACCOUNT WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE….WHEN HE FINALLY DID COME, THE DAY BEFORE THE SEMINAR, HE SHOWED UP IN REALLY BAD SHAPE BOTH PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY AND IN FACT THE AIRLINE HAD AN AMBULANCE AT THE AIRPORT READY TO RUSH HIM TO THE HOSPITAL. WHAT FINALLY CAUSED THE SPLIT WAS WHEN HIS BEHAVIOR BECAME SO ERRATIC AND BIZARRE AND MONEY WAS MISSING AND HE REFUSED TO SEND OVER SUPPLEMENT STOCKS THAT I PAID FOR---WHICH I LATER FOUND OUT WAS DUE TO THE FACT THAT HE OWED THE MANUFACTURERS A HUGE AMOUNT OF MONEY. AND OF COURSE WHEN WE STARTED TO FIND OUT HIS CREDENTIALS WERE UNSUBSTANTIATED AND HE WAS MAKING OUTLANDISH CLAIMS ABOUT ALL SORTS OF PEOPLE.
IAN: I WOULD ALSO HAVE TO SAY AROUND THE TIME OF THE SEMINAR AS I WAS STAYING WITH TREVOR IN THE STATES. IT CONFIRMED MY DEEPEST FEARS AND FROM THEN ON I BEGAN RETHINKING A GREAT MANY THINGS.
JM: Hopefully everybody knows that Ian Harrison is a professional bodybuilder competing in the IFBB. Ian, you haven't competed for some time now and it appeared that Paul was playing a major role in your comeback. How are these events going to affect your return to competition?
IAN: THANKS FOR REMEMBERING ME, BUT REMEMBER, IT’S NOT OVER TILL THE FAT LADY SINGS AND RIGHT NOW SHE IS IN MY CONSERVATORY TIED AND GAGGED UNTIL THE TIMING IS PERFECT. PAUL HAS GIVEN ME ADVICE JUST AS KERRY HAS. PAUL HAS NEVER FULLY PREPPED ME FOR A SHOW AND ALL OF HIS ADVICE WOULD BE FILTERED AND I WOULD ASSUME MY OWN CONCLUSIONS. NOT WORKING WITH PAUL BORRESEN WILL NOT EFFECT MY RETURN TO COMPETITION AND ONCE I DECIDE, BELIEVE ME, IAN HARRISON WILL SHOW THE WORLD JUST WHAT HE IS CAPABLE OF. BEING AN UNDERDOG INSPIRES ME, I KNOW WHAT I AM CAPABLE OF (325LBS BEFORE MY CONTEST PREP FOR THE 98 ARNOLD) AND WITHOUT FOLLOWING ANY GURU’S ADVISE I WILL COMPETE (AS MY GOOD FRIENDS NASSER EL SONBATY AND LEE PRIEST DO) LOOKING HOW I WANT TO LOOK, AND MAY THE JUDGES DO WHAT THEY WILL.
JM: Despite the split, it appears from your article you still advocate a lot of the ideas and theories set forth by Paul. Is this an accurate description of your current position?
TREVOR: AGAIN IT NEEDS TO BE UNDERSTOOD THAT MOST OF THIS INFORMATION IS FROM BOTH IAN AND MYSELF. EVERYONE WHO HAS EVERY EMAILED PAUL HAS ALWAYS RECEIVED A REPLY AND AN ANSWER TO THEIR QUESTION FROM ME, AS PAUL WAS NOT AROUND TO ANSWER THEM AND IF I SENT HIM EMAILS, THEY WERE NEVER ANSWERED, SO I DID THE WORK MYSELF AND CONSULTED WITH IAN EXTENSIVELY.
IAN: ABSOLUTELY. A LOT OF PAUL’S THEORIES ARE SOUND. I PERSONALLY DO NOT AGREE WITH MANY OF HIS EXTREME CYCLES HOWEVER.
JM: Both of you claim that most of the work done on the Biohazard USA site was actually done by you and not Mr. BORRESEN. Why did you allow him to take all of the credit?
TREVOR: BLIND FAITH I GUESS. WE BELIEVED HE WAS, IN FACT, A PHARMACOLOGIST AND A BIOCHEMIST AND WE FELT THIS WOULD GIVE THE COMPANY INSTANT CREDIBILITY AND ALLOW US TO REACH A GREATER NUMBER OF PEOPLE AND HELP THEM GET WHERE THEY WANT TO GO.
IAN: I CONSIDERED HIM A GOOD FRIEND AND TREVOR SHOWED TREMENDOUS LOYALTY BECAUSE IT WAS PAUL’S ORIGINAL IDEA TO CREATE THE COMPANY IN THE STATES.
JM: What are the immediate future plans for Biohazard USA?
TREVOR: OUR IMMEDIATE PLANS ARE TO CONTINUE DOING WHAT WE HAVE BEEN DOING, HELP PEOPLE GET AS HUGE AS POSSIBLE WITHOUT HURTING THEMSELVES IN THE SHORTEST SPACE OF TIME AND MAKE CUTTING EDGE, HIGH END, NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS AVAILABLE TO ALL WHO ARE INTERESTED.
IAN: BUILD, GROW, HELP FELLOW BODYBUILDERS AND ACHIEVE OUR GOALS.
JM: I know that there had been a long-term feud between Biohazard and Chemical Nutrition. What's your current relationship with Kerry Kayes and Dorian Yates?
TREVOR: I RECENTLY SPOKE TO KERRY KAYES AND DORIAN FOR THE FIRST TIME AND I WAS EMBARRASSED FOR EVER THINKING NEGATIVELY ABOUT 2 GUYS WHO ARE GENUINELY NICE PEOPLE THAT LOVE THE SPORT OF BODYBUILDING AND ARE LOOKING TO GIVE BACK TO IT IN EVERY WAY…IT WAS ONLY BECAUSE PAUL TOLD ME KERRY WAS A MONSTER THAT RUINED HIS LIFE AND STOLE HIS COMPANY AND THAT DORIAN WAS EQUALLY AS EVIL THAT I EVER THOUGHT NEGATIVELY OF THEM……IT IS A FACT THAT WHEN I FIRST SPOKE TO PAUL, ALL I DID WAS ASK HIM ABOUT DORIAN BECAUSE HE HAD BEEN AN INSPIRATION TO ME AND AT THAT TIME PAUL TOLD ME HE WAS GOOD FRIENDS WITH DORIAN AND THAT HE HELPED COACH HIM FOR THE MR. OLYMPIA. SOON AFTER, THOUGH, HE STARTED TO PAINT A MUCH DIMMER PICTURE OF DORIAN.
IAN: KERRY KAYES AND I HAVE KNOWN EACH OTHER FOR OVER 10 YEARS. HE IS A GOOD, GOOD MAN WHO HAS ONLY SHOWN ME KINDNESS AND RESPECT. DORIAN TOOK BODYBUILDING INTO THE NEXT MILLENNIUM AND I RESPECT HIS ACHIEVEMENTS TREMENDOUSLY. AS A MAN I REALLY NEVER GOT TO KNOW HIM.
JM: It seemed that Paul gained a lot of notoriety after detailing some of the outlandish dosages he claimed current bodybuilders are using. To the best of your knowledge, how much of this was based on actual hands-on experience with elite bodybuilders and how much was conjecture?
TREVOR: UNFORTUNATELY IT HAS COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT HE HAS NEVER HAD ANY HANDS ON EXPERIENCE WITH THE TOP PROS HE CLAIMED TO HAVE HELPED AND THAT IT WAS ALL A LIE.
IAN: I KNOW MOST OF THESE GUYS AND WE TALK! PAUL’S CLAIMS ARE MERELY CHINESE WHISPERS TO MY KNOWLEDGE.
JM: Ian, I know for some time that Paul worked with you and helped develop your cycles. Were the cycles you developed together similar to those he spoke about in terms of dosages?
IAN: NO WAY JOSE’! I REMEMBER SEVERAL COURSES BEING WRITTEN OUT FOR ME BY PAUL, THEN I WOULD GO HOME AND SIFT THROUGH LOGIC AND EXCESS. USUALLY THIS WOULD END UP WITH ME DOWNGRADING THE DOSAGES BY ˝ TO Ľ AND USING MY OWN EXPERIENCE OF WHAT WORKS FOR ME.
JM: Will you continue to operate under the Biohazard name?
TREVOR: YES, BIOHAZARD USA IS OWNED BY US, NOT PAUL BORRESEN. I DO NOT WANT TO SOUND RUDE, BUT THAT IS THE TRUTH REGARDLESS OF WHAT HE WISHES TO BELIEVE.
IAN: YES!! ABSOLUTELY!!
JM: You've claimed that supplements were paid for and never shipped. At this point, I would have to imagine that all de****gs between Biohazard USA and Paul BORRESEN are over. Do you plan on releasing a new line of supplements under the Biohazard name?
IAN: I’LL LET TREVOR ANSWER THAT.
TREVOR: ALL OF THE ORIGINAL FORMULAS WILL BE RELEASED IN THE STATES IN THEIR FULL POTENCY UNLIKE THAT WHICH IS BEING DONE CURRENTLY IN THE U.K. (WHICH IS ANOTHER REASON FOR THE SPLIT)
-
11-13-2005, 07:23 PM #66
men just read! (I do not use LR3 nor HGH ! ) just slin and aas.
Organ- control- igf 1 treated
Heart 232.0 +/- 11.0 ------- 230.4 +/ 10.4
Liver 1005.9 +/- 48.5 ----- 1027.0 +/- 45.9
Spleen 78.8 +/- 4.6 ------ 114.6 +/- 4.4 (50 %)
Lungs 502.6 +/- 29.9 ------ 515.1+/- 28.3
Kidneys 131.8 +/- 5.3 ------ 145.6 +/- 5.0
LR3 is more powerful than IGF ! twice !
-
11-13-2005, 07:27 PM #67Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 924
JM: From what you've told me, there's recently been an issue of potency with some of the Biohazard products. What are you're plans to rectify this situation?
IAN: AGAIN I’LL LEAVE THIS TO TREVOR.
TREVOR: NONE OF THE PRODUCTS IN THE USA ARE OR HAVE EVER BEEN LACKING IN POTENCY, IT HAS ONLY RECENTLY COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT THE UK LINE OF SUPPLEMENTS IS TARNISHED TO SAY THE LEAST WHICH LIKE I SAID BEFORE IS ONE OF THE MAJOR REASONS FOR THE SPLIT.
JM: I know you've been hesitant to address this issue directly, but do either of you have any direct knowledge of current recreational drug use by Mr. BORRESEN?
TREVOR: NO COMMENT.
IAN: LET ME JUST SAY THAT IF ANYONE CLAIMS TO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT ANYONE ELSE IS DOING THEN THEY ARE LYING AND I AM NOT A LIAR. AT THE END OF THE DAY, ONLY THE PERSON WHO IS USING DRUGS KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING. PEOPLE OBSERVING FROM THE OUTSIDE CAN ONLY MAKE EDUCATED ASSUMPTIONS AND WE WILL LEAVE IT AT THAT.
JM: Do you feel this drug use has contributed in any way to the demise of your relationship with Mr. BORRESEN?
TREVOR: LET'S JUST SAY THAT DRUGS COULD CHANGE JESUS INTO LUCIFER, JUST IMAGINE WHAT THEY COULD DO TO A LESSER MAN.
IAN: I STRONGLY SUSPECT SO.
JM: I know that Paul had claimed on numerous occasions to be sky-rocketing in muscular bodyweight and planned on entering competitions fairly soon. In all of the pictures I have seen of Paul, he never seemed to be anywhere near the level of development he claimed. What's the best condition either of you have seen him attain?
TREVOR: WHEN I FIRST CONTACTED PAUL HE TOLD ME HE WAS 285LBS IN 10% BODYFAT....WHEN I FINALLY SAW HIM FOR THE FIRST TIME HE WAS AROUND 245LBS. I HAVE ONLY SEEN PICTURES OF HIM IN CONTEST SHAPE AND HE WEIGHED AROUND 200LBS.....THE THING IS, IS THAT HE TOLD ME THAT HE WOULD BE 306LBS BY THE TIME OF THE SEMINAR, SO I PROMOTED HIM IN ALL THE ADVERTISEMENTS AS A 5'8'' 306LB FREAK OF NATURE WITH 23'' CALVES, AND WHAT SHOWED UP WAS SOMEONE WHO WAS NOT FIT TO DO MUCH OF ANYTHING DUE TO EXTREMELY POOR HEALTH MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY AND WEIGHED ABOUT 225LBS.
IAN: AT AN E.F.B.B. QUALIFIER HE COMPETED IN SEVERAL YEARS AGO. HE WAS A CREDIBLE AMATEUR IN THE LIGHTHEAVY CLASS. HIS GENETICS WERE NEVER THE BEST AS FAR AS LINES GO, BUT HE DID ATTAIN A GOOD STANDARD (NOT PRO BY ANY MEANS HOWEVER)
JM: What does the future hold for Trevor Smith, Ian Harrison, and Biohazard USA?
TREVOR: WHENEVER YOU EMANCIPATE YOURSELF FROM A BAD SITUATION, IT HURTS AT FIRST, BUT EVENTUALLY YOU LOOK BACK AT IT AS THE GREATEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE, SO IN THAT RESPECT THE FUTURE IS AS BRIGHT AS EVER.
IAN: I MUST AGREE WITH TREVOR ON THAT ONE.
JM: If Paul were here right now, what would you both say to him?
TREVOR: THAT IT IS TOO BAD THAT SOMEONE WHO IS SMART AND WELL READ WOULD FEEL THE NEED TO LIE ABOUT THEMSELVES TO MAKE THEM LOOK AND FEEL BETTER AND THAT HAD HE JUST BEEN HONEST, HE COULD HAVE HAD THE WORLD ON A STRING. I TRULY WISH IT DID NOT HAVE TO END THIS WAY AND I WISH EVERYTHING HE SAID WAS TRUE AS I PUT MY LIFE SAVINGS INTO PROMOTING HIM. AS A HUMAN BEING, WE BOTH WISH HE STRAIGHTENS HIMSELF OUT AND SOMEDAY CAN REALIZE THAT PEOPLE CARED AND WENT OUT OF THEIR WAY FOR HIM AND THAT HE LET THEM AND MORE IMPORTANTLY HIMSELF DOWN. AT THE END OF THE DAY ALL YOU HAVE IS YOUR WORD, AND IF THIS IS WORTHLESS SO ARE YOU.
IAN: I PERSONALLY WOULD SAY DON’T WASTE YOUR POTENTIAL PAUL. STRAIGHTEN YOURSELF UP AND FULFILL YOUR PROMISES TO YOU AND THE PEOPLE AROUND YOU. AND GOOD LUCK.
JM: This is an open forum, and you can say pretty much anything you want. What would you like to tell the readers of Anabolic Extreme?
TREVOR AND IAN: THAT BIOHAZARD USA IS HERE TO STAY AND THAT THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF HARDCORE KNOWLEDGE, HARDCORE INFORMATION, CUTTING EDGE PRODUCTS REMAIN THE FOUNDATION OF THE COMPANY AND THAT ANYONE CAN CALL US UP WITH ANY QUESTION AND WE WILL DO OUR BEST TO HELP THEM OUT. LIFE IS TOO SHORT TO LEARN THE HARD WAY AND WE WANT TO INSURE THAT PEOPLE ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS WITHOUT HURTING THEMSELVES.
Editors note: Out of fairness, we attempted to contact Paul Borreson for his comments. We have not heard a response from him as of yet. Should he decide to contribute his opinion surrounding the recent brouhaha between himself and Biohazard USA, we will certainly bring it to your attention. I'd like to personally thank Trevor Smith and Ian Harrison for granting us this interview and allowing us to reprint the article below.
FLASH!
The day before this article was sent off to be posted, we contacted Ian Harrison by telephone in England to get his comments about some recent claims made on Biohazard849, Paul Borrseson's UK website. Specifically, Borreson is still claiming an association with Ian and claims Ian had nothing to do with the recent breakup. Here's what Ian had to say.
AE: Ian, what is the status of your relationship with Paul Borreson?
Ian: I've split with Paul Borreson and I have no connection with Biohazard UK anymore.
AE: What role will you play, if any, in the future of Biohazard USA?
Ian: My future is most definitely in the USA, and I feel confident I will be working with Trevor Smith.
So that's it folks! Seems something fishy is about with Paul Borreson and Biohazard UK since he still claims a relationship with Ian. You heard it hear first!
THE BIOHAZARD USA ARTICLE
THE REAL SITUATION......
IT HAS COME TO BIOHAZARD USA'S ATTENTION THAT WE HAVE BEEN DUPED.....LIED TO, AND BASICALLY MADE TO LOOK LIKE A ****ING FOOL....
BIOHAZARD USA WAS FOUNDED BY IAN HARRISON AND TREVOR SMITH WHO WERE INSPIRED BY THE PRINCIPLES SET FORTH, BUT SELDOM FOLLOWED BY PAUL BORRESEN....DURING THIS PROCESS WE WERE LED TO BELIEVE MANY THINGS...ALL OF WHICH WE HAVE COME TO FIND OUT HAVE BEEN UN-TRUE!!!
ALL OF THE CYCLE PROGRAMS YOU HAVE RECEIVED HAVE, IN FACT, BEEN PROVIDED BY TREVOR SMITH AND IAN HARRISON......THIS CANNOT BE DENIED SINCE ALL THOSE HAVING RECEIVED EMAIL RESPONSES CLEARLY CAN SEE THAT THEY CAME FROM [email protected] WHO CONSULTS DAILY WITH I.F.B.B. PROFESSIONAL IAN HARRISON . THEY NEVER CAME FROM PAUL BORRESEN EXCEPT A SMALL NUMBER THAT HE ANSWERED WHEN HE WAS OVER HERE....
HOWEVER, BECAUSE WE BELIEVED IN WHAT WE WERE TOLD AND BECAUSE WE ARE LOYAL PEOPLE, WE DECIDED TO TAKE A BACK SEAT AND LET PAUL BORRESEN HAVE ALL THE CREDIT
THIS, OF COURSE, WILL NO LONGER CONTINUE!!!
AS WE SPEAK THERE ARE A PLETHORA OF LAWSUITS TARGETED AT MR. BORRESEN FOR MAKING UN-SUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS....NOT THE LEAST OF WHICH IS THAT THE GREAT DORIAN YATES IS A DRUG ADDICT.....THIS IS NOT ONLY UNFAIR, BUT DEAD WRONG, ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING THE SOURCE WHO HIMSELF IS KNOWN TO HAVE A LARGE NUMBER OF, SHALL WE SAY, PERSONAL ISSUES...... IT HAS ALSO COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT PAUL BORRESEN IS MAKING CLAIMS THAT HE IS COACHING LEE PRIEST FOR THE MR. OLYMPIA AND THAT HE PERSONALLY KNOWS LEE USES 3000MG OF GEAR PER DAY!!! WELL UPON SPEAKING TO LEE TO CLEAR SOME THINGS UP HE PROVED THE TYPE OF MAN HE IS BY BASICALLY LAUGHING AT THE WHOLE THING. LET’S FACE IT 3000MG WOULD KILL A ****ING BULL, NOT TO MENTION THAT THERE IS NO REASON TO USE THESE AMOUNTS…..PAUL BORRESEN ALSO STATED THAT LEE EATS 30 BIG MACS A DAY IN THE OFF SEASON AND GETS AWAY WITH THIS BY USING A TON OF INSULIN …..THIS IS ALSO A JOKE SINCE AFTER SPEAKING WITH LEE AND HIS DOCTOR WE FOUND OUT THAT LEE IS HYPO-GLYCEMIC AND NEVER—NOR CAN HE EVER—USE INSULIN….LOOK FOR A FULL BLOWN INTERVIEW WITH LEE NEXT MONTH
BOTH TREVOR SMITH AND IAN HARRISON ALONG WITH CHRIS SNEDDON (WHO WERE ALL ON HAND TO CARRY PAUL BORRESEN THROUGH THE USA SEMINAR BECAUSE OF HIS HORRIBLE CONDITION) HAVE NOW SPOKEN WITH BOTH DORIAN YATES AND KERRY KAYES AND ABOUT 30 OTHER PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN LEFT HOLDING THE BAG OF SHIT CREATED BY PAUL BORRESEN
WE WOULD LIKE TO TAKE THE TIME TO APOLOGIZE WHOLE HEARTEDLY FOR ANY SLANDEROUS INFORMATION THAT APPEARED IN OUR WEBSITE IN REGARDS TO DORIAN YATES, CHEMICAL NUTRITION, KERRY KAYES, BRIAN BATCHELDOR T.C. LUOMA AND TESTOSTERONE .NET........AS IT TURNS OUT, THEY HAD EVERY RIGHT TO PULL THE INTERVIEW WITH PAUL BORRESEN DUE TO THE FACT THAT NONE OF HIS CLAIMS COULD BE SUBSTANTIATED---EVEN THOUGH WE WERE ASSURED THAT COPIES OF ALL LITERATURE PUBLISHED AND ALL DEGREES WERE SENT FED-EX TO T.C. LUOMA AT TESTOSTERONE.NET TO VALIDATE PAUL'S CREDENTIALS.... (UNFORTUNATELY THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO BE DONE BY SOMEONE CLAIMING TO BE BOTH A PHARMACOLOGIST, BIOCHEMIST AND NOW A DOCTOR, BUT WHO IS NOT ANY OF THE ABOVE)
IN SHORT, BIOHAZARD USA IS HERE TO STAY HOLDING TRUE TO IT'S PRINCIPLES......WE HAVE NEVER LIED TO ANYONE, BUT UNFORTUNATELY WE HAVE BEEN LIED TO A GREAT NUMBER OF TIMES BY THE VERY PERSON WE WERE TRYING TO PROMOTE........ IT SHOULD ALSO BE MADE KNOWN THAT THE REASON WE HAVE BEEN DELAYED IN HAVING OUR PRODUCTS AVAILABLE IS THAT SEVERAL SHIPMENTS WHICH WERE PRE-PAID FOR WERE NEVER SENT BY PAUL BORRESEN WHO INSTEAD STRUNG US ALONG CLAIMING THEY WERE SENT OR BEING SENT AND THAT IT WAS CUSTOMS FAULT THAT THEY DID NOT GET HERE.....OF COURSE WE RECENTLY FOUND OUT THE PRODUCTS WERE NEVER SHIPPED, BUT THAT THE MONEY SENT FOR THEM WENT INSTEAD INTO MR. BORRESENS POCKET....THIS WAS THE SAME SCENARIO FOR PROMINENT NATIONAL COMPETITOR JUSTIN BROOKES, WHOM BOTH TREVOR AND IAN HELPED IN THE OFF SEASON TO GET TO HIS BIGGEST EVER (293LBS) ONLY TO WATCH A NON-FUNCTIONAL PAUL BORRESEN f**k UP HIS WHOLE CONTEST PREP BY NOT SENDING HIS PROGRAMS AND SCREWING HIM OUT OF 800 DOLLARS. THE END RESULT FOR JUSTIN WAS THAT HE WEIGHED IN AT 242LBS.....A FAR CRY FROM THE 265LBS HE SHOULD HAVE CARRIED ON THE STAGE HAD SOMEONE NOT COMPLETELY ****ED HIS ENTIRE CONTEST PREP.....
WE CAN NOW TAKE THE FRONT SEAT (WHERE WE BELONG) IN BRINGING HARD-CORE INFORMATION AND PRODUCTS TO THE MASSES. BOTH IAN AND TREVOR PERSONALLY APOLOGIZE AND HOPE THAT YOU ALL REALIZE THAT THIS WILL DO NOTHING BUT MAKE US A STRONGER COMPANY.......IF ANYONE HAS ANY QUESTIONS OR NEEDS ANY ASSISTANCE WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO CALL US AT 310-822-6412 OR EMAIL US.......
LOOK FOR MORE ARTICLES ON THIS TURN OF EVENTS AND LOOK FOR A FULL BLOWN INTERVIEW WITH THE GREAT DORIAN YATES.....WHO WILL BE ON HAND AT THE 1999 MR. OLYMPIA TO CONTINUE TO GIVE BACK TO THE SPORT AND PROMOTE HIS AND HIS PARTNER KERRY KAYES' COMPANY--CHEMICAL NUTRITION. IF YOU PLAN ON ATTENDING THE 1999 MR. OLYMPIA IN LAS VEGAS, PLEASE STOP BY THEIR BOTH AND SHOW YOUR SUPPORT, AND TELL THEM TREVOR AND IAN SENT YOU AND THEY WILL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO SET THINGS STRAIGHT IN A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT WAYS…..
-
11-13-2005, 07:53 PM #68Originally Posted by Nicky B
Recombinant Human Interleukin-15 - rHuIL-15
DescriptionRecombinant Human KGF-1(FGF-7) produced in E.Coli is a single, non-glycosylated, polypeptide chain containing 164 amino acids and having a molecular mass of 18995 Dalton. The rHuKGF is purified by proprietary chromatographic techniques. SourceEscherichia Coli.Physical Appearance:Sterile Filtered White lyophilized (freeze-dried) powder. Formulation:The protein was lyophilized from a concentrated (1mg/ml) solution with no additives. Solubility:It is recommended to reconstitute the lyophilized rHuKGF in sterile 18MΩ-cm H2O not less than 100µg/ml, which can then be further diluted to other aqueous solutions. Stability: Lyophilized rHuKGF although stable at room temperature for 3 weeks, should be stored desiccated below -18 °C. Upon reconstitution rHuKGF should be stored at 4 °C between 2-7 days and for future use below -18 °C. For long term storage it is recommended to add a carrier protein (0.1% HSA or BSA). Please prevent freeze-thaw cycles. Purity:Greater than 98.0% as determined by: (a) Analysis by RP-HPLC. (b) Anion-exchange FPLC. (c) Analysis by reducing and non-reducing SDS-PAGE Silver Stained gel. Amino acid sequence:The sequence of the first five N-terminal amino acids was determined and was found to be Met-Cys-Asn-Asp-Met. Dimers and aggregates:Less than 1% as determined by silver-stained SDS-PAGE gel analysis. Biological Activity:ProSpec's rHuKGF is fully biologically active when compared to standards. The ED50, calculated by the dose-dependant stimulation of KGF-responsive BaF3 indicator cells (measured by 3H-thymidine uptake) is less then 10ng/ml corresponding to a specific activity of 10 Units/mg. ProSpec's rHuKGF biological activity was measured by the KGF's mitogenic activity on BaF3 cells expressing the KGF receptor. Endotoxin: Less than 0.1 ng/µg (IEU/µg) of rHuKGF. Protein content:Protein quantitation was carried out by two independent methods: UV spectroscopy at 280 nm using the absorbency value of 0.9 as the extinction coefficient for a 0.1% (1mg/ml) solution. This value is calculated by the PC GENE computer analysis program of protein sequences (IntelliGenetics). Analysis by RP-HPLC, using a calibrated solution of KGF as a Reference Standard. UsageThis material is for research, laboratory or further manufacturing purposesLast edited by rodge; 11-14-2005 at 12:17 PM.
-
11-14-2005, 08:26 AM #69
Bro, did you just post a source on the open forum?
-
11-14-2005, 10:03 AM #70Originally Posted by jerseyboy
-
11-14-2005, 10:04 AM #71Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Originally Posted by oswaldosalcedo
Why dont you use LR3 and HGH?
goose4....
-
11-14-2005, 10:10 AM #72Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
I wonder what results you would get from Interleukin-15 - rHuIL-15? Has anyone tried this or have heard of people who have?
goose4......
-
11-14-2005, 12:15 PM #73Originally Posted by goose4
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS