Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: IGF1-LR3 / GH (192 and/or 191) / MGF - Your input please.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    IGF1-LR3 / GH (192 and/or 191) / MGF - Your input please.

    What does everyone think of any of these? How would you rate them/compare them. Whatever you have used, list effects, sides, gains etc please.

    I am just curious really but also interested because I need to get my shoulders back to 100%.

    As far as I can tell, GH is the way to go but (Its expensive and) I wonder if anyone has gotten similar results from IGF1-LR3/MGF?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    33
    I'm curious about this too. The new sponsor states great gains when using MGF with the LR3, I'd like to see some results (other than rodent muscle gain : ),

    My goal is increased strength and fat loss. I'm 6' , 220, 18% and I'm 43.

  3. #3
    IGF-1 , great overall gains MGF great localized gains

    Steroid-Peptides
    http://www.steroid-peptides.com

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    US
    Posts
    295
    Im new to the topic of GH and IGF, and am interested in following ya on this skull. The length one has to take GH is roughly 6-8 months correct? Lets say you go through 1 kit a month, thats some skrilla $$. I wonder the how the results compare between the two (HGH vs. Igf1-lr3). Seeing as a cycle of Igf-lr3 is only 4-5 weeks, the cost would be sig cheeper.

    BigSwol

  5. #5
    From the input I've gotten, Lr3IGF-1 is much better than GH. And to be honest, I'm not using GH for 3-4 months to see results, when I can use IGF and see results in weeks, not months.

    Check out the forum sponsor, because I've been using their MGF + IGF and getting great gains from it.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
    From the input I've gotten, Lr3IGF-1 is much better than GH. And to be honest, I'm not using GH for 3-4 months to see results, when I can use IGF and see results in weeks, not months.

    Check out the forum sponsor, because I've been using their MGF + IGF and getting great gains from it.

    I really hope yer not just tryin to bump their rep man..........

    sounds too good to be true.


    Where have you gotten your input? personal use?
    Last edited by guest589745; 08-04-2006 at 07:58 PM.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Skullsmasher
    I really hope yer not just tryin to bump their rep man..........

    sounds too good to be true.


    Where have you gotten your input? personal use?
    Personal use. I've finished a bottle of each from them, and the gains I've gotten have prompted me to order more.

    I've been getting some pretty unreal fat loss and strength gains from the IGF, and the MGF is bringing up my lagging bodyparts, which is good because I feel like aesthetically my chest has always lagged. Now it's coming up to par from the MGF, and the IGF also seems to be healing my knee injury, as I've been able to run again.

    Try them...you'll see that their products are very high quality.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Skullsmasher
    I really hope yer not just tryin to bump their rep man..........

    sounds too good to be true.


    Where have you gotten your input? personal use?

    ...........lol..................
    there are a lot of new mr olympians now!
    Last edited by oswaldosalcedo; 08-05-2006 at 05:59 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    2,056
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
    From the input I've gotten, Lr3IGF-1 is much better than GH. And to be honest, I'm not using GH for 3-4 months to see results, when I can use IGF and see results in weeks, not months.

    Check out the forum sponsor, because I've been using their MGF + IGF and getting great gains from it.
    Have you been using it in conjuction with slin or AAS?

  10. #10
    I believe this study:

    http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/84/5/1716

    Strongly points to the conclusion that IGF-1 is better than hGH for building muscle. When they are both compared, at equal doses, IGF-1 resulted in greater muscle gains, in this study.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Califas
    Posts
    9,138
    Anthony and I have our differances, but I have to agree with him, I've been saying that LR3 is better then HGH for a year or more now. As far as the sponsor goes, I don't know him and it doesn't matter to me if you buy from him or someone else, LR3 is still better then HGH in my book.

    JohnnyB

  12. #12
    Thanks johhny!

    Good input here.

  13. #13
    what if they are ran together....
    www.SteroidCleanse.com

    Completely Cleanse Your Body of Steroids in Only 5 Days!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    350
    bump, and at what doses of each?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •