Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: Somatorm: New Formula???
-
02-08-2007, 11:01 PM #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Posts
- 83
Somatorm: New Formula???
I've read nothing but bad reviews of Somatorm on this board. People seem to have a lot of bad past experiences with it. Though I've read elsewhere Soma has recently changed their formula, guarantying 191aa.
I've read good reviews on it from very reputable guys, yet I still hear the occasional complaints. Has anyone any recent experience with it?
-
02-09-2007, 01:12 AM #2
You saw positive comments about this HGH on the bolex board because bolex's sponcor carries Somatorm HGH, so ofcourse the Bolex community will say good things about it.
From all the research I have done, I can tell you that every where else you go you will hear more negative than positive stuff, way more negative than positive actually.
I was on one of the boards reading a thread regarding Somatorm HGH and one of the members there said he recieved a lab report straight from the CEO of ElRamoz (Somatorm HGH manufacturer) stating the GH is legit and that it contains a 191 amino acid chain. The report he had was as professional as any other report. It was a on a company letterhead with the company's details etc etc. Anyway, the member that recived this report deicided to call the company that "apparently" tested Somatorm HGH and when he called them to confirm the report is legit they told him they never did that test. But, it doesn't end there. Another member recived the same lab report from ElRamoz except this report was tested by a different company in a different country. So that member decided to call that lab and confirm the report was legit, and guess what? The lab told him the same thing, they never did a report as such. On another board, I have had 2 different members say that they will never deal with ElRamoz because they sent their money, but never recived the product. So, wether all this is true or not, I don't know, but I am curious why Somatorm is the only product that always gets negative feedback.
Anyway, I don't mean to make ElRamoz look bad, but there are just too many things that don't add up and that's enough for me to turn away from that product. On Bolex, as soon as you mention one bad thing about Soma HGH, your thread will be deleted or you wil get banned.
Many have used this product and ended up with red welts (which most believe indicates the GH is 192aa), but what's worse is some claim they never got results at all. So this leaves me to believe this stuff might not even be HGH, or perhaps it is but no way it is 191aa, it would be 192aa HGH.
The best thing you can do is get advice from people on different boards (excluding Bolex) about this product and I bet you will have a lot more negative comments than positive. Then do the same thing, but this time ask about other HGH brands, like Jintropin, Saizen etc etc, and you will see you will get a lot more positive comments than negative about brands such as these. So, if you keep on getting bad feedback about a certain brand from people that go on different boards, and keep on getting good feedback about other brands, than what does this tell you about these products? I think that's common sense.
I say, save your money and get something with a good rep.
P.S. The formula change wasn't regarding the amino acid chain in the GH. Apparently this GH was restructured so people would get less red welting.
All the best.
-Gear
-
02-09-2007, 08:42 AM #3Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Posts
- 83
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I'll probably hold off on the Soma a while longer until I hear some more reviews on this new formula. Don't like the idea of premixing a 60 IU vile anyway.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS