Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    hocoathlete's Avatar
    hocoathlete is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    339

    IGF-site growth?

    can IGF significantly increase site growth?

  2. #2
    SPIKE's Avatar
    SPIKE is offline AR-Hall of Famer/RETIRED
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Glutes & Quads
    Posts
    9,519
    This is a long debated subject but IMO no it does not. It is a systematic peptide therefore I do not see any logical reason why it would cause any site specific growth.

  3. #3
    perfectbeast2001's Avatar
    perfectbeast2001 is offline "king of free stuff" / Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    7,979
    I shoit it in my quads for 4 weeks and over the next few months they grew like weeds (Very hardcore leg workouts and 100% consistent diet). IMO it does cause site growth. It is not a magic pill, everything else has to be 100% right to get results.

  4. #4
    goose is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    England...
    Posts
    2,832
    huIGF will give local growth,this is not the long form.

  5. #5
    hocoathlete's Avatar
    hocoathlete is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    339
    Quote Originally Posted by perfectbeast2001
    I shoit it in my quads for 4 weeks and over the next few months they grew like weeds (Very hardcore leg workouts and 100% consistent diet). IMO it does cause site growth. It is not a magic pill, everything else has to be 100% right to get results.

    true that! but yeah i want to find something that will hlp bring up my rear delts faster with perfect diet and trainin

    thanks bro

  6. #6
    plzr8's Avatar
    plzr8 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,352
    Quote Originally Posted by perfectbeast2001
    I shoit it in my quads for 4 weeks and over the next few months they grew like weeds (Very hardcore leg workouts and 100% consistent diet). IMO it does cause site growth. It is not a magic pill, everything else has to be 100% right to get results.

    off topic: PB wheels lookin great bro! i know you've been killing your legs for awhile now, def paid off

  7. #7
    SPIKE's Avatar
    SPIKE is offline AR-Hall of Famer/RETIRED
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Glutes & Quads
    Posts
    9,519
    Quote Originally Posted by goose4
    huIGF will give local growth,this is not the long form.
    As far as I've read, huIGF can cause some kind of Site specific growth but not LR3.

    I've used more LR3 then probably anyone else out there, lol. I can't say that I've noticed any site specific growth whatsoever.

  8. #8
    goose is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    England...
    Posts
    2,832
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayhova
    As far as I've read, huIGF can cause some kind of Site specific growth but not LR3.

    I've used more LR3 then probably anyone else out there, lol. I can't say that I've noticed any site specific growth whatsoever.

    I agree dude.Pinn told me he used huIGF a few times and managed to get a few pounds from local growth and thats it.Apart from that I dont know anyone who has used it.

  9. #9
    hocoathlete's Avatar
    hocoathlete is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    339
    is huIGF common to get? all ive seen is the long version.

  10. #10
    goose is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    England...
    Posts
    2,832
    Quote Originally Posted by hocoathlete
    is huIGF common to get? all ive seen is the long version.

    No it`s not common.I only know one place that has it.It appears only the very elite will give it a try.Guys fighting to put a few pounds in a local spot.

  11. #11
    Logan13's Avatar
    Logan13 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,740
    IMO, no waterbased injectable will stay around the area of injection long enough to promote localized growth.

  12. #12
    hocoathlete's Avatar
    hocoathlete is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    339
    Quote Originally Posted by goose4
    No it`s not common.I only know one place that has it.It appears only the very elite will give it a try.Guys fighting to put a few pounds in a local spot.
    oh is it cheaper than long IGF?

    ill have to find it and get some

  13. #13
    SPIKE's Avatar
    SPIKE is offline AR-Hall of Famer/RETIRED
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Glutes & Quads
    Posts
    9,519
    ^^^^^^^^ If it's legit huIGF then it is much more expensive then LR3.

  14. #14
    Ironman5151 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    somewhere
    Posts
    397
    IMO, it helps

  15. #15
    SPIKE's Avatar
    SPIKE is offline AR-Hall of Famer/RETIRED
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Glutes & Quads
    Posts
    9,519
    ^^^^^^^^^^What help? As far as what? What are your experiences?

  16. #16
    Titan1 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    619
    No IGF-1 gives site growth not L3r or rhigf-1 read this its from the post "my take on igf-1":

    If you want to use IGF for localization growth get some rhIGF-1. It binds to the wound only and does not go into the bloodstream. This helps repair the injection wound and makes new cells in that area only. While Long R3 IGF binds somewhat to the would then makes its way to the blood stream causing growth throughout the body..

    This is false.

    The difference between rhIGF-1 and Long R3 is that the Long R3 does not get bound by binding protein and thus is 100% active whereas you do lose a great % of whatever amount of rhIGF-1 you inject to IGFBP3.

    While technically it is true that if you inject a large amount of the rhIGF-1 it will have almost only localized effect, it is so because the "excess" that does not bind to cells in the muscle in which it is injected is rapidly bound up by IGFBP3 and thus rendered unusable by cells elsewhere. It would be much much better in such a case to inject a smaller amount and not have ANY excess that gets bound up by IGFBP's.

    And while technically it is true that if you inject a large amount of Long R3 IGF-1 in a muscle, it will first bind to the nearest available receptor, and spread, binding to more and more receptors and not be bound up and neutralized by IGFBP's, meaning that it will travel all through your body and grow all kinds of tissue. This is called the systemic effect of IGF-1. Therein lies the only distinction in terms of BOTH half-life and localized/systemic effect between the Long and the human varieties.

    What does all this mean?

    It means that technically, for the part of the muscle in which you inject, THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN rhIGF-1 and Long R3 IGF-1. They both have the EXACT SAME LOCAL EFFECT. But rhIGF-1 gets neutralized quick, whereas Long R3 gets to float around until it finds a receptor.

    What does all this tell us?

    It tells us many things. Let's start with what we want, then see where that leads us. What do we want? Bigger muscles. More muscle cells that we will later grow with exercise and gear. A pump? Fatloss? Yeah, right. You can get a pump with a good "pump" product for a quarter of the price of IGF-1. Fatloss? Clen /Alb and T3/T4 will give it to you again at a fraction of the price of IGF-1. More muscle cells, you can ONLY get with IGF-1 (and MGF too). Nothing else will give it to you and if you are using IGF-1 for anything else, you are misusing it. More muscle cells is CLEARLY the best use for IGF-1.

  17. #17
    NotSmall is offline English Rudeboy
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    RIP Brother...
    Posts
    5,054
    Quote Originally Posted by Titan1
    No IGF-1 gives site growth not L3r or rhigf-1 read this its from the post "my take on igf-1":
    Erm, 2 things:

    • Did you read it before you copied and pasted it? - He is actually saying that both do cause some site growth!
    • This is just an opinion of another member, albeit a highly respected member on alot of boards and one whose opinion I value, yet you have quoted him as if what he says is fact.

  18. #18
    Titan1 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    619
    Well ask people and youŽll see that 9 out of 10 people will say that they didnt get site growth and neither did i all the times iŽve used it and clearly you dont know how IGF-1 and Lr3igf-1 works ,the problem with rhigf-1 is that when you inject it your body produces IGFBP3 and diactivates the igf-1 thats why lr3 is better
    Last edited by Titan1; 04-19-2007 at 11:25 AM.

  19. #19
    NotSmall is offline English Rudeboy
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    RIP Brother...
    Posts
    5,054
    Quote Originally Posted by Titan1
    Well ask people and youŽll see that 9 out of 10 people will say that they didnt get site growth and neither did i all the times iŽve used it
    LMAO - So why did you post a quote from one of the guys that believes you can get site growth from LR3?


    Quote Originally Posted by Titan1
    and clearly you dont know how IGF-1 and Lr3igf-1 works ,the problem with rhigf-1 is that when you inject it your body produces IGFBP3 and diactivates the igf-1 thats why lr3 is better
    Erm, how is that evident from what I posted? - I understand the difference between the two just fine thanks!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •