Results 1 to 16 of 16
Thread: inject IN ARM or ABDOMEN
-
10-01-2009, 12:41 PM #1
inject IN ARM or ABDOMEN
i saw this doctor on youtube that said the best place to absorb HGH would be in the arm and not by the bellybutton...what do yall think?
-
10-01-2009, 12:45 PM #2
I guess if you inject it subq then it doesn't really matter. I don't think it's absorbed faster in a particular bodysite. Personally I use the abdomen b/c I can see the fat melting away ... as the time goes by it gets harder to find an area of subq fat to inject..
-
10-01-2009, 01:53 PM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- College Station
- Posts
- 1,676
look down a few post, there is a study on IM vs SUBQ
-
10-01-2009, 01:55 PM #4
-
10-01-2009, 02:34 PM #5
-
10-01-2009, 02:59 PM #6
-
10-01-2009, 03:20 PM #7
so is hgh better absorb in the arm subq or in the abdomen subq?...what do yall think?
-
10-01-2009, 03:34 PM #8
Why not just rotate between IM and sub-Q?
That way you get benefits of both.
-
10-01-2009, 04:03 PM #9Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- College Station
- Posts
- 1,676
subq is subq.(in a reasonable place) dont know about the scalp
-
10-01-2009, 04:05 PM #10
It would be pretty hard to inject sub-q in your own arm unless you had someone to do it for you.
-
10-01-2009, 07:17 PM #11Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Posts
- 1,294
If you're going subq I'd say the belly is the easiest place to pin. Pull up your shirt, pinch, pin. Pretty simple. I'm shooting subq in my chest as an experiment right now. I want to see if there is local fat reduction as advertised when using HGH. It's a pain in the rear pinching the chest fat with one hand and trying to contort the other arm to inject the chest. Just go with the belly. It's easy.
-
10-03-2009, 01:59 AM #12Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Posts
- 668
-
10-03-2009, 01:47 PM #13Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- College Station
- Posts
- 1,676
ive got what is probably a dumb azz theory. it seems that most things that are injected subq tend to have a cult of people claiming that their drug of choice has localized fat loss benefits. so what if its the BA in the mix that helps separate the fat cells and makes them easier for the body to burn off? or maybe its not the BA but just the act of separating them with any fluid. just a thought.
-
10-04-2009, 10:50 AM #14Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Posts
- 1,294
I'm not pinning my abs because I dieted myself into a pretty lean abdominal. I've never pinned into the chest so the chest is "virgin" muscular area. I know how much fat I have now and I can more easily measure fat loss due to localized injection.
peteroy01, that's what I'm trying to figure out. There is a lot of posts out there claiming the virtues of localized fat loss. I must admit I lost fat in my abs but I'm not sure if it was the diet or the HGH. That's why I'm working on a controlled experiment by pinning into my chest. I want to find out for myself if there is localized fat loss due to HGH.
-
10-04-2009, 09:50 PM #15Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- College Station
- Posts
- 1,676
im extremely interested in your finding. keep us posted. it would be sweet if you could inject gh in one tit and BW in the other tit and see if theres a difference.
-
10-08-2009, 10:26 AM #16Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Posts
- 1,294
I've been pinning subq in my chest for a week. The localized fat loss is very gradual but I can see better definition in my chest. I think there is something to the localized fat loss claim. Cool.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS