Question?

[Dang-It]

I have 6 kits and a regular cycle.. My question is, is it better to do the cycle when first starting the gh or should I wait a couple of months then start the cycle?

[gymfu]

I was told to run the hgh for two months then start the AAS.

[Family Guy]

and some say the oposit. start the cycle and when the test kicks in. then u add the gh. i have only done 1 gh cycle erlier. so i kan not say to much about it.. i personly think gh is waist of cash.

[Noles12]

run the GH for a while first. Starting it during your cycle will produce no real benefits

[Dang-It]

Thanks for the reply's.. I heard start later in the cycle and at the same time..

I think I will wait it makes more sense.. They say it takes 3-5 months to start seeing anything from the gh

[Times Roman]

if you look at Sylvester Stallone, at 60, he's pretty ripped. Obviously the HGH works and is not a waste of time. But it is a slow process, and the general consensus is six months should be the minimum cycle. Since HGH and Test are two different independent things, you can run them however you like, together, or seperate. If you read the HGH posts, you will learn that it takes awhile (weeks) before you will notice anything. But the same is true for test, that it takes a few weeks (depending) before you start noticing any effects. The bottom line is that your GH cycle will be much longer than your test cycle, so you can pretty much start GH right away, and do a second, concurrent test cycle whenever you think it's right. Just to make a point, you should probably think of it as two cycles, one for HGH, and the other for test, with both running at the same time. Some call it stacking, but I don't think that's accurate. HGH has little to do with test, it acts differently, you pin it differently, the cycle times are hugely different. Even the needle size is different. You don't need to run test to run HGH, and visa versa. So really, it's an open field. You need to come up with what's best for you and your finances/circumstances.

[Noles12]

if you look at Sylvester Stallone, at 60, he's pretty ripped. Obviously the HGH works and is not a waste of time. But it is a slow process, and the general consensus is six months should be the minimum cycle. Since HGH and Test are two different independent things, you can run them however you like, together, or seperate. If you read the HGH posts, you will learn that it takes awhile (weeks) before you will notice anything. But the same is true for test, that it takes a few weeks (depending) before you start noticing any effects. The bottom line is that your GH cycle will be much longer than your test cycle, so you can pretty much start GH right away, and do a second, concurrent test cycle whenever you think it's right. Just to make a point, you should probably think of it as two cycles, one for HGH, and the other for test, with both running at the same time. Some call it stacking, but I don't think that's accurate. HGH has little to do with test, it acts differently, you pin it differently, the cycle times are hugely different. Even the needle size is different. You don't need to run test to run HGH, and visa versa. So really, it's an open field. You need to come up with what's best for you and your finances/circumstances.

Not quite sure what that has to do with anything.

I agree with the rest though

[The Gladiator 911]

He's using him as an example to proove that GH works, peope seem to expect magic from the first pin. It doesnt work like that.

[Times Roman]

He's using him as an example to proove that GH works, peope seem to expect magic from the first pin. It doesnt work like that.

Exactly. In fact, hgh is so slow, I've heard many get disappointed and quit after only two months. They are probably thinking... let see.... $250/mo x 2 months = $500 and very little results.

[Dang-It]

I'm adding this to my HGH cycle after being on the hgh for 2 months any thoughts?

weeks
8-20 test-e 600m wk shots mon-thur
9-18 tren -e 400m wk "__________ "
12-20 masteron 100m eod