Results 1 to 1 of 1
Thread: IGF-1 LR3 IM vs Subq
-
01-27-2011, 04:07 PM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Posts
- 1
IGF-1 LR3 IM vs Subq
Ive started looking into this stuff and almost regret it now. Picked up two 1000mcg vials of lypholized powder because, well, it was there. So far the majority of info on this forum and others has been positive. My only problem is whether or not i want to stick this IM or Subq. My only concerns are intestinal growth. I want to know if running a low dose say 40mcg per day (one upon waking second immediately pwo) subq will have this effect on my intestines if run for no more than a month at a time with a month off.
Ive run a couple cycles with compounds ranging from basic enth to tren with and without orals like drol with pretty great results. This stuff caught my attention for its ability to generate new muscle growth vs increasing the size of whats already there and for the pump its reputed to give. Somewhat similar to why youd want to run HGH but for a fraction of the cost.
I understand gains will be different but im in no rush. What the hell should i do? I dont mind being stuck but the idea of subq is more appealing then hitting my bis etc every day IM. Just need some guidance. Like i said ive had pretty good results with AAS with minimal sides i like to be as educated as i can before starting. Any and all input would be greatly appreciated as ive seen arguments for both. Thanks
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS