Need some advice on igf-1 lr3 for site growth

**andyr99** · 02-26-2012, 10:15 PM

Hi everyone so I have a couple of questions for knowledgable people out there basically I've been trying to gain some mass on my chest for a while now without much success my overall progress ive been happy with considering I'm an ectomorph that's come from being 5'6 110lb to now 155lb in about 18 months but no matter what I do I struggle with chest so I've decided to give IM igf shots a go I know a lot of guys think site growth is bs but I've read tons of articles on the subject & I'm convinced that if I only do igf into the pecs on chest days post workout i'll get some site growth? I'll also be using it for the triceps seeing as though most chest exercises incorporate triceps & vice versa so my questions are Do I need to stick to the 5 weeks on 5 weeks off protocol while I'll only be using it only twice a week at 40mcg per day? I'm assuming it shuts down your natural igf production after a certain time of use? Secondly do I really need to do it bilaterally? Can I just do say left pec one week then right the next? Don't wanna sound like a bitch but less punctures is obviously better. Thanks everyone in advance

**gixxerboy1** · 02-26-2012, 10:17 PM

it will not help for what you want. I used it at a much higher dose and saw nothing. Most people i know who have used it were disappointed.

**andyr99** · 02-26-2012, 10:26 PM

Damn that sucks there's definitely mixed opinions on this stuff but I've already got it so I'll give it a go regardless & decide for myself I guess

**DanB** · 02-27-2012, 02:43 AM

You sure your stuff is legit? Lab test have shown the majority out there to be bunk......

**andyr99** · 02-27-2012, 04:13 AM

Can never be 100% sure I guess but I've ordered numerous products off this supplier in the past & everything's been good thus far.

**hankdiesel** · 02-28-2012, 12:09 PM

I used igf-1 des with good results. Never used the lr-3 though.

**andyr99** · 02-28-2012, 06:59 PM

That's good to hear something positive & from the research I've done the results should be the same regardless of the different half life because it'll attach to stimulated igf receptors & hold for around 72hrs & any unused will be destroyed by the immune system well before the difference in half life makes any difference, that's from what I can gather. Does nobody have any advise on questions I asked?

**ScotchGuard02** · 02-29-2012, 02:41 PM

I did two cycles of IGF-lr3. Did it work? Honestly, I couldn't really tell. I do know I didn't like AA injecting into my muscles. It feels exactly like a wasp sting.

**andyr99** · 02-29-2012, 08:01 PM

Yeah I thought the aa might be an interesting experience but I'm hoping by reconstituting it with bac water will tone it down a bit, I'm not expecting heaps from this stuff but if it can add a few pounds to my chest & triceps over 6 months or something I'll be more than happy

**Hazard** · 02-29-2012, 10:19 PM

why not use RH igf-1 which would probably be the best option for site growth..... IF it really works.

~Haz~

**soulstealer** · 03-01-2012, 10:39 AM

I call bullshit on site growth!..... The only site growth that seems reasonable is the site injection of oils to stretch the fascia... That is it... and were not talking miracles here... just a little help lol... short of SEO your not goona see a huge difference.