Results 1 to 24 of 24
-
10-16-2012, 12:02 AM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 10
Does GHRP/GHRH promote Hyperplasia?
Read datbtrue's whole read on cjc and ghrp-6 and its comparison in gh release compared to HGH itself, and if i understand correctly 100mcg of ghrh/ghrp is as much of a change in GH as 5ius of HGH....but does this promote new muscle cells?
in the end, running a comparison of 15iu's of GH a day for the same time you'd run a nice HGH cycle for say 6 months....will this promote hyperplasia and cause splitting of cells?
-
10-16-2012, 12:32 AM #2Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 824
Never seen any hyperplasia from any peptides. Nothing is going to compare to 15iu of GH, however 15iu of GH ED is not needed for hyperplasia. To see hyperplasia you need to run it a minimum of 6-12 months around 6iu minimum. Hyperplasia is increased cell production in a normal tissue or organ.
I would do a lot more research into both especially GH at those doses you are talking about. Most of the positives will be undone at that dose and GH can become dangerous at those doses as well.
-
10-16-2012, 12:40 AM #3New Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 10
ofc i wouldnt be running GH at that dose its totally unneccesary, esp for the money you pay! :P
but i was just wondering if hyperplasia took effect with peptides, and i can't find much on them since they are still "research" peps/chems you know?
if you can find me a good article on it, altho GHRP must be run in conjuction with GHRH for their full effects, i hear GHRH is the one that promotes hyperplasia....correct me if im wrong though, i'd like a nice read on these
-
10-16-2012, 12:49 AM #4Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 824
Like I mentioned before I have seen no hyperplasia from EXOGENOUS ADMINISTERED peptide use. I think they are a waste of money as well. Save your money for real gh.
Best
-
10-16-2012, 01:28 AM #5New Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 10
ok thanks for your insight
I read about how there was a test done on certain bones for any growth ( concept that GH causes acromegaly) and there were no signs of growth, so i assume if any there is very little?
I'd hope its atleast somewhat useful, although it did help lean out + fix some problems body wise
anyone else have a good read on this stuff?
-
10-16-2012, 01:54 AM #6Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 824
Talk to Roman about peptide use and body problem fixes. He seems to like them. As far as muscle growth, don't expect any..
-
10-16-2012, 05:45 AM #7
I don't have any studies for you but I've been on peptides (GHRP/GHRH) for alittle over a year now and I'm weighing about 5-7 lbs. heavier and leaner as well so I would def. say peptides have aided in some hyperplasia. That being said, they won't give you the hyperplasia quite like aas but they can be used as a tool in the arsenal.
-
10-16-2012, 01:40 PM #8Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 824
-
10-16-2012, 02:28 PM #9New Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 10
-
10-17-2012, 05:54 AM #10Junior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Posts
- 118
Why not just go with the GH.
Last edited by shredded; 10-17-2012 at 06:56 AM.
-
10-17-2012, 06:21 AM #11
Hard to say exactly where the 5-7lbs came from exactly but that's why I said peps are a tool in the arsenal of building leaner muscle tissue. I can't say for certain they cause hyperplasia but none-the-less I'm liking my leaner fuller physique since being on peps. I've taken GH for awhile before and for me the peps are def. an effective alternative.
I can tell you this, I've ran many aas cycles before and when I combined aas + peptides my results were way more dramatic. The peps sort of supercharge your aas cycle.
I think you're confusing hypoglycemia and hyperplasia. The topic at hand is peps and hyperplasia.
-
10-17-2012, 06:59 AM #12Junior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Posts
- 118
-
10-17-2012, 07:33 AM #13Junior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Posts
- 118
I have not herd of GHRP having any hyperplasia effects, you need to look into CJC - 1295, IGF'S etc.
-
10-17-2012, 05:41 PM #14Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 824
IMOLA you lucky duck, sounds like your getting real GH in the those Peptide vials!!
-
10-17-2012, 10:13 PM #15New Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 10
-
10-17-2012, 10:19 PM #16Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 824
With the amount of money you could save from GHRP-2 and Mod GFR-1 for a year you could actually guy some real GH that would do something. I would rather wait a year get thee real stuff then spend a year with the knock off's trying to get real results.
-
10-18-2012, 04:32 AM #17Junior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Posts
- 118
-
10-18-2012, 04:56 AM #18Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 824
The point is moot gentleman, neither cause hyperplasia. Only high doses of Sythetic GH adminstered daily are going to give you the answer you seek, don't waste your money on peptides.
-
10-18-2012, 05:23 AM #19Originally Posted by Phased;6217***
-
10-18-2012, 02:04 PM #20Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 824
I still think your getting real GH in those Peptides
-
10-19-2012, 04:21 AM #21
God... People do you have event one little bit of logic in your brain?
Does peptides cause hyperplasia (increasing cell count)? Of course not... They just cause puls of REAL NATURE Growth Hormone which is produce in your body. And guess what... This GH DOES CAUSE hyperplasia... It is the same GH which caused you to be as big as you are right now - I mean which caused you to GROW UP!!
So again... Does peptides cause hyperplasia? Directly no, but if you do have more natural GH levels, it causes hyperplasia. And it is faaar more effective as exogenous GH..
I have seen study about how exogenous GH in body cause shock, which is natural, because body does not expect this and dopes not NEED this. And there is more.. When you use peptides, they doesnt just release GH but also some other accompanying hormones so body does expect increased GH levels and is able to USE them much better.
Anything more? God, people try to use your brain before you post something...
-
10-19-2012, 05:42 AM #22
Hope this wasn't directed at me as look at my posts above I never said that peptides directly cause hyperplasia! I simply said that I've gained 5-7 lbs. lean muscle mass during the year while being on peptides. So before you make such a broad statement calling someone out you might direct it in the appropriate direction.
-
10-19-2012, 06:33 AM #23
No it was not.. Actually I kind of wanted to back up your statements, because it is totally logical you had results from peptides. It was directed to guys who keep saying that peptides does not work or cause hyperplasia and synthetic GH is better and shit like that all around. I use peptides personally and I think it is REALLY GREAT way to achieve very good results for fragment price comparing to GH... Not mentioning that there are so many fake synthetic GH... well don't want to start this discussion.
-
10-22-2012, 05:46 AM #24
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS