Results 1 to 12 of 12
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By ScotchGuard02

Thread: Igf-1 vs gh for mass gains and keeping steroid gains

  1. #1
    fitguy is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,355

    Igf-1 vs gh for mass gains and keeping steroid gains

    Which will be more effective to keep gains and gain even more lean mass

  2. #2
    jgd
    jgd is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    121
    I would like to know too!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    543
    Gh would probably be better for long term as it can be run longer with no desentitation as will happen with the igf peptide. The dose would have to be high enough, but from what I gather a gh source is near impossible to come by, and it isn't cheap. Igf supposedly has more direct anabolic properties in the short term, so it would work better than gh as a bridge between cycles. Gh should be on cycle for best results IMO

  4. #4
    dubrovin1012 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    242
    Quote Originally Posted by AllKindsOGains View Post
    Gh would probably be better for long term as it can be run longer with no desentitation as will happen with the igf peptide. The dose would have to be high enough, but from what I gather a gh source is near impossible to come by, and it isn't cheap. Igf supposedly has more direct anabolic properties in the short term, so it would work better than gh as a bridge between cycles. Gh should be on cycle for best results IMO
    Took 2 years for me to finally get a hold of it and it's 800$ for about 2 months

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by dubrovin1012 View Post
    Took 2 years for me to finally get a hold of it and it's 800$ for about 2 months
    I would stick to the gh pulsing peps. They mimic a low dose gh protocol and are far cheaper, less than 200 a month. Igf is about 100 a month depending on your dose

  6. #6
    dubrovin1012 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    242
    Quote Originally Posted by AllKindsOGains View Post

    I would stick to the gh pulsing peps. They mimic a low dose gh protocol and are far cheaper, less than 200 a month. Igf is about 100 a month depending on your dose
    I feel like you get what you pay for and I like top quality.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by dubrovin1012 View Post
    I feel like you get what you pay for and I like top quality.
    That doesn't apply here. Peptides and synthetic gh are two entirely different things, and have different mechanisms of action. Peps stimulate natural production of the hormone vs you injecting the hormone itself, which is suppressive. Up to you, if you've got the money

  8. #8
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,921
    Forget peps they are useless for mass gains and most are a complete hype to the people who cant afford real hgh.

    HGH is your best bet for mass gains but in all honesty you'll need to be on for at least 12 months at 8ius+ daily along side cycling on and off to see some benefit, its a long term treatment for mass gains.

    The other problem is finding real gh,prescription all the way and without doubt pharm grade.

    Once again forget peps they are a joke and once off them you see fuk all for your buck.

  9. #9
    dubrovin1012 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    242
    Quote Originally Posted by marcus300 View Post
    Forget peps they are useless for mass gains and most are a complete hype to the people who cant afford real hgh.

    HGH is your best bet for mass gains but in all honesty you'll need to be on for at least 12 months at 8ius+ daily along side cycling on and off to see some benefit, its a long term treatment for mass gains.

    The other problem is finding real gh,prescription all the way and without doubt pharm grade.

    Once again forget peps they are a joke and once off them you see fuk all for your buck.
    People and research say the real stuff starts to work on a second month. Maybe not necessarily allot of muscle gain but help heal injuries and lowering bf. If you want mass gains out of it quick then it's best to stack it with aas.
    Last edited by dubrovin1012; 05-08-2015 at 10:41 AM.

  10. #10
    dubrovin1012 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    242
    Quote Originally Posted by AllKindsOGains View Post

    That doesn't apply here. Peptides and synthetic gh are two entirely different things, and have different mechanisms of action. Peps stimulate natural production of the hormone vs you injecting the hormone itself, which is suppressive. Up to you, if you've got the money
    I want certain benefits from hgh that you can't get from peptide so gotta empty my pockets.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    7,794
    I've been on HGH 5iu for the 7th year straight. I gotta tell you that I'm totally biased towards HGH. It's the real deal and I'm the living proof. I'm on 100mg/wk Test Cyp TRT, HGH 5iu/ed, multi vitamins & all the healthy junk they advertise. lol Stats: age:55, Ht: 5'11", Wt: 203#, BF: 12%, 225# bench 36reps (personal record). I'm not freakish huge but that's not what I'm after. I'm after the fitness model look, lean and tight. If you want to gain mass HGH will help but it's gonna be a very expensive $$$/pound ratio. Rx HGH's not cheap as in "out of my budget". For me it isn't only the anabolic results I'm after. It's the ability to concentrate on complex problems, awesome sense of well being, not having to worry about belly fat, no pain in the old joints, and the ego boost from looking good.

    So Marcus, how do you really feel about peptides? LOL Listen to Marcus, he just tells it like it is.
    marcus300 likes this.

  12. #12
    dubrovin1012 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    242
    Quote Originally Posted by ScotchGuard02 View Post
    I've been on HGH 5iu for the 7th year straight. I gotta tell you that I'm totally biased towards HGH. It's the real deal and I'm the living proof. I'm on 100mg/wk Test Cyp TRT, HGH 5iu/ed, multi vitamins & all the healthy junk they advertise. lol Stats: age:55, Ht: 5'11", Wt: 203#, BF: 12%, 225# bench 36reps (personal record). I'm not freakish huge but that's not what I'm after. I'm after the fitness model look, lean and tight. If you want to gain mass HGH will help but it's gonna be a very expensive $$$/pound ratio. Rx HGH's not cheap as in "out of my budget". For me it isn't only the anabolic results I'm after. It's the ability to concentrate on complex problems, awesome sense of well being, not having to worry about belly fat, no pain in the old joints, and the ego boost from looking good.

    So Marcus, how do you really feel about peptides? LOL Listen to Marcus, he just tells it like it is.
    When you first start taking it, how long did it take for you to see any kind of results? And did you take anything with it?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •