-
10-10-2011, 11:40 AM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 8
Recovery times? - short cycles vs moderate cycles
I understand that there is no hard and fast time frame for recovery due to the variety of factors, however is there any indication that very short cycles (say 4 weeks) are generally quicker in recovery vs moderate cycles (8-10 weeks)?
Assuming a good pct is done of course.
Bill Roberts on ********* spoke of 2 on 4 off cycles being remarkably quicker in recovery and this made me wonder if it's always the case of shorter cycles being quicker to recover from than longer cycles, or does it reach a certain point during suppression that makes no difference.
-
10-10-2011, 11:52 AM #2
Well a general rule of thumb is time on+pct=time off so yeah shorter cycles yield a shorter recovery period. But the only real way to tell would be to get blood work done.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS