Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By AR's Dr.Silabolin

Thread: How safe is to take sarms, long term outcomes?

  1. #1
    Testlolblast is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    134

    Question How safe is to take sarms, long term outcomes?

    I was thinking about trying a sarm called testolone (also rad 140) once. But now I consider all the pros and cons how safe to a health it can be in a long term after doing a cycle if compared to real gear (steroids ). It is, can't it damage androgen receptors, cause mutations that recovery is just impossible?

  2. #2
    AR's Dr.Silabolin's Avatar
    AR's Dr.Silabolin is online now "Norwegian Power"
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    4,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Testlolblast View Post
    I was thinking about trying a sarm called testolone (also rad 140) once. But now I consider all the pros and cons how safe to a health it can be in a long term after doing a cycle if compared to real gear (steroids). It is, can't it damage androgen receptors, cause mutations that recovery is just impossible?
    There is no studies or bro science that suggest it migth be more short lifespanening than roids.
    But we dont know. SARMs have only been around since the millenium while roids the 50s.

    For heart and arteries, it almost certain as it will not cause high BP. It lowers hdl cholestrol like roids, but too many experts say u shouldnt worry about cholestrol.
    Roids does not cause cancer (except Abombs-livercancer). The only possibility is cancer caused by SARMs. But chances are slim. Very slim.

    Test recovery is also much easier, so mental sides and suiceide are more unlikely with SARMs.

    U shouldnt start with rad. Most start with ostarine. Its step one. Then u go to LGD.
    Then pimp with rad at your next LGD run.
    Then maybe s23. As a standalone or with LGD (my favourite).

    Last. Remember that use beond 4 weeks degrades your testlevels.
    So if u wanna do more than just try it, u need a trtdose with test.

    They said RAD140 would cure this need for test.
    It doesnt!

    Its a lot of fake stuf out there. But this is also a roidsprobleme. So its nit a con/pros argue.

    Last q. Its impossible it will destroy the ARs.
    I recover very well from SARMs and i have been using them for some 5 years.

    But if u like BB and young n fresh, u should do the real stuff.

    I like to see SARMs as an old man thing. Guys well in their 40s should not use much gear.
    But 2-3 SARMs cycles a year with test, migth be respondsible for yourself, your family and your job.



    Sent fra min SM-N9005 via Tapatalk
    Last edited by AR's Dr.Silabolin; 10-18-2018 at 06:08 PM.
    Testlolblast likes this.

  3. #3
    Testlolblast is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    134
    Well, thank you for this great and worthful information.

  4. #4
    fitguy is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,355
    Quote Originally Posted by AR's Dr.Silabolin View Post
    There is no studies or bro science that suggest it migth be more short lifespanening than roids.
    But we dont know. SARMs have only been around since the millenium while roids the 50s.

    For heart and arteries, it almost certain as it will not cause high BP. It lowers hdl cholestrol like roids, but too many experts say u shouldnt worry about cholestrol.
    Roids does not cause cancer (except Abombs-livercancer). The only possibility is cancer caused by SARMs. But chances are slim. Very slim.

    Test recovery is also much easier, so mental sides and suiceide are more unlikely with SARMs.

    U shouldnt start with rad. Most start with ostarine. Its step one. Then u go to LGD.
    Then pimp with rad at your next LGD run.
    Then maybe s23. As a standalone or with LGD (my favourite).

    Last. Remember that use beond 4 weeks degrades your testlevels.
    So if u wanna do more than just try it, u need a trtdose with test.

    They said RAD140 would cure this need for test.
    It doesnt!

    Its a lot of fake stuf out there. But this is also a roidsprobleme. So its nit a con/pros argue.

    Last q. Its impossible it will destroy the ARs.
    I recover very well from SARMs and i have been using them for some 5 years.

    But if u like BB and young n fresh, u should do the real stuff.

    I like to see SARMs as an old man thing. Guys well in their 40s should not use much gear.
    But 2-3 SARMs cycles a year with test, migth be respondsible for yourself, your family and your job.



    Sent fra min SM-N9005 via Tapatalk
    What are the sides and pros of using sarms?

  5. #5
    AR's Dr.Silabolin's Avatar
    AR's Dr.Silabolin is online now "Norwegian Power"
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    4,176
    Quote Originally Posted by fitguy View Post
    What are the sides and pros of using sarms?
    Pros:
    Steroidlike effects.
    With no elevated BP, liverenzymes, hct, PSA, creatinine, heart beat at rest.
    No DHTsides.
    No estrogen or prolactin problemes.
    Easy shutdown. More easy to recover. Mini pct only.
    Not as illegal as steroids .
    8 weeks off are enough.

    Cons:
    Its drugs, not hormones. Body doesnt know about it. Long term effects unknown.
    UGL only products available.
    Lowers HDL cholestrol as a roid. Many "experts" say that migth cause arteriesclorosis. (I and my sources disagree).
    Must be run with a testbase.
    And last..its weaker than a good cycle. But...LGD for me really kicks ass. And i think its awesome based on their gentleness with the bloodvalues.

    Sent fra min SM-N9005 via Tapatalk

  6. #6
    fitguy is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,355
    Quote Originally Posted by AR's Dr.Silabolin View Post
    Pros:
    Steroidlike effects.
    With no elevated BP, liverenzymes, hct, PSA, creatinine, heart beat at rest.
    No DHTsides.
    No estrogen or prolactin problemes.
    Easy shutdown. More easy to recover. Mini pct only.
    Not as illegal as steroids .
    8 weeks off are enough.

    Cons:
    Its drugs, not hormones. Body doesnt know about it. Long term effects unknown.
    UGL only products available.
    Lowers HDL cholestrol as a roid. Many "experts" say that migth cause arteriesclorosis. (I and my sources disagree).
    Must be run with a testbase.
    And last..its weaker than a good cycle. But...LGD for me really kicks ass. And i think its awesome based on their gentleness with the bloodvalues.

    Sent fra min SM-N9005 via Tapatalk
    What do usually first timers use and what to expect

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •