that's assuming i can even find it! 6 months of posting is a lot to look through. what i did is went to the back of the book where all the clinical data was, then i believe i looked it up on the internet, and posted several.
this is the book that supports the anabolic wiindow position:
http://www.amazon.com/Nutrient-Timin.../dp/1591201411
the thing that made me respect the book was all the cites of clinical data, and not from a narrow few studies, but hundreds of them. And before I adopted their position, I actually looked the clinical data up on the internet and verified.
But I am always a little skeptical with anything. Two things I see that couuld change my mind....
1) More recent data that introduces knowledge that supercedes this data from around 2003
2) Somehow determine that the clinical studies I reviewed were financed by the supplement industry, which taints their findings.
If it is requested of me, i can put together a new thread, and I will cite various clinical studies that support the anabolic window position, and we can debate anew.
Not trying to be difficult.
But if you know what i do for a living, you'd know I'm very analytical, and have a strong desire to verify data.