the general consensus that you hear parroted on forums and in gyms all the time is that you should wait until you hit your maximum natural genetic potential before starting to use steroids.
I'm just wondering what you guys think about this and your opinions are.
instead of give my opinion I'll just give a thought and example
lets say we have two identical twins. twin A and twin B, with the same exact muscle building genetics.
- both twins jump on the same training, diet and nutrition plan and start training at age 20
- both twins make progress and get over their 'newbie' gains phase over a 3 year period
- Twin A decides to stay natty , Twin B decides to run AAS cycles and HGH and other growth factors (at 23)
- Twin A keeps building his natty status for 3 more years to max out his natural potential and then gets on the same AAS protocols as his twin brother at age 26
When both these twins hit age 30 , who is going to be the bigger badder specimen , twin A or twin B
Twin A trained until he hit his natty max . Twin B started AAS earlier. But by time they both hit 30 , Twin B has had 3 more years to develop more muscle cells (satellite cell proliferation), androgen receptors, and other growth factors and at a much more accelerated rate from early on.
isn't that going to play a big factor on who is more jacked when they both hit 30. seems like Twin B would definitely have the edge here. what do you guys think?
Reply With Quote