Once again, the title of this post is "UN nuclear chief attacks hostile US claims on Iran". There are a number of background or contextually relevant issues around this title. Why do you feel so strongly that they should not be discussed?
Your post:
"I trust zero from the UN"
Now I could say the same to you, what does this have to do with "the nuke topic"? Off topic! You would defend your post on the basis that your opinion on UN trustworthiness is influential to your position on this topic. I would agree that your post is contextually relevant.
So my post follow the same line as yours, you don't trust the UN, I don't trust the US leadership on this issue and I refer to their track record as influencing my position. So why is that now off topic?
You and Logan are beginning to create the impression that you really want this thread "censored" or limited to Iran bashing only.
Tell me I am talking sh!t and why you think so. If you can convince me on the issues I will back off, Even tell me you just dont want to hear negative US views on this. But don't tell me my posts are off topic.





Reply With Quote