
Originally Posted by
rockinred
No you are not wrong that the hammer stregnth is beneficial, but where you are wrong is that the hammer's cannot replace free weights and especially if you want some mass... If you are trying to add more mass to chest then make sure you are using free weights as your core for chest. Free weights are a priority and then burn out in the manner you are saying with the hammer. I would try something like:
warmup,
DB press flat,
DB press incline,
bb decline,
hammer burn outs,
cables if you still need some more.
next workout
Warmup,
BB flat
DB incline
hammer burnout
cables or pushups
Adam covered the importance of stabilizers and range of motion (rom). I use the hammers at my gym once in a while for chest, often for back, and once in a while for shoulders...which I like the way the shoulder ones feel the best. in no way do I expect to gain major size from those... it is the free weights that will do it... if your concern is working to failure and you don't have a partner, then use the DB's more frequently. I seldom use hammers on chest and it is one of my strong points... to get your chest going good make sure you don't neglect your shoulders and tris... hitting those good on other days will enable you to develope your chest more.
Hammer's are good and I definitley like the addition to my options but don't replace free weight exercises for those. or don't be misled.. actually when I am feeling lazy I use more hammer's on back days... but it is not better than bb rows or db rows etc....