Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: why sustanon why not enanthate

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Back from Afghanistan
    Posts
    27,376
    Quote Originally Posted by t-dogg View Post
    Sust was made is the 80's i believe. They thought it was the amazing test to be. Your gains will be/should be the same.

    Some say they started gaining sooner on sust. Maybe "bro science " logic.
    Sust is an outdated concept created a couple of dozen decades ago. The idea was that based on the blend, you could get the immediate benefit due to the prop, and then the long term benedit due to the (e, c or whatever). So, in theory, it would be the ew or eow injection with smooth blood plasma levels.

    That is the theory.

    There is a problem with the theory.

    Blood plasma levels were NOT stable with an ew or an eow injection protocol.

    Yes, there would be the initial spike from the prop. And then the mid and long term esthers would kick in at relevent stages.

    Sust was really designed for the first injection. After that, when the long term esthers kick in, then no need for the short term esthers like P. and if pinning ew, then really no need for the mid term esthers either.

    And it is expensive.

    An inexpensive alternative is to front load with some P, while at the same time start with E as well.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    Quote Originally Posted by Times Roman View Post
    Sust is an outdated concept created a couple of dozen decades ago. The idea was that based on the blend, you could get the immediate benefit due to the prop, and then the long term benedit due to the (e, c or whatever). So, in theory, it would be the ew or eow injection with smooth blood plasma levels.

    That is the theory.

    There is a problem with the theory.

    Blood plasma levels were NOT stable with an ew or an eow injection protocol.

    Yes, there would be the initial spike from the prop. And then the mid and long term esthers would kick in at relevent stages.

    Sust was really designed for the first injection. After that, when the long term esthers kick in, then no need for the short term esthers like P. and if pinning ew, then really no need for the mid term esthers either.

    And it is expensive.

    An inexpensive alternative is to front load with some P, while at the same time start with E as well.
    This is almost manditory for me now if I run an E ester cycle. I don't mind pinning so I got no prob with prop all the way through either

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •