Results 1 to 40 of 41

Thread: Bulking up............

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    12,796
    This gets me somewhere in the neighborhood of 4,500 cals
    P - 390 - 43%
    C - 300 - 33%
    F - 210 - 23%

    390g pro = 1560cals
    300g carbs = 1200 cals
    210g fat = 1890cals

    1560 + 1200 + 1890 = 4650cals

    1560/4650 = 33% pro
    1200/4650 = 25.8% carb
    1890/4650 = 40.6% FAT

    thought u mite wanna see this

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Sarasota
    Posts
    8,130
    Quote Originally Posted by --->>405<<--- View Post
    390g pro = 1560cals
    300g carbs = 1200 cals
    210g fat = 1890cals

    1560 + 1200 + 1890 = 4650cals

    1560/4650 = 33% pro
    1200/4650 = 25.8% carb
    1890/4650 = 40.6% FAT

    thought u mite wanna see this
    This really shows how we are all different. This diet might make others gain a bunch of fat but seems to be working well for TR.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    12,796
    Quote Originally Posted by bikeral View Post
    This really shows how we are all different. This diet might make others gain a bunch of fat but seems to be working well for TR.
    rite u are there Al. assuming hes been on it for awhile. at 300g carbs + 200g fat if he isnt gaining a good bit of fat i would think he just cant get fat because that looks like a recipe for fat gain IMO.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Back from Afghanistan
    Posts
    27,376
    Quote Originally Posted by --->>405<<--- View Post
    while ive got u TR i have heard ur the man to ask about peps. i am/have considered mod GRF (1-29) + IPAM at 100mcg 3x per day each (i think is the dosage). curious to ur thoughts and/or experience with this and if u think i will see benefit in fat loss/ability to maintain leanness??? and if so to what extent? assuming all other variables are optimal (diet, workout).

    sorry to hijack and i will start another thread if u like in the proper section..
    sorry mate. never taken either of those two. I can't comment without direct, first hand experience. Now, if you want to talk TB500, my kids' been yammering how he thinks it has helped his cardio. Not sure why that would be. I haven't tested that theory yet......

    Quote Originally Posted by bikeral View Post
    This really shows how we are all different. This diet might make others gain a bunch of fat but seems to be working well for TR.
    I am cheating a bit. I just started back in with the peps. Ghrp-6 and cjc 1295. these two for me help keep fat build up in check. I was on these two the whole year i was in afghanistan. eating was problematic, and i regularly ate 3k+/cal/day and was doing it "dirty" too. but i never gained much weight the whole time i was there. I'm thinking it may have had something to do with the peps.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Sarasota
    Posts
    8,130
    Quote Originally Posted by Times Roman View Post
    sorry mate. never taken either of those two. I can't comment without direct, first hand experience. Now, if you want to talk TB500, my kids' been yammering how he thinks it has helped his cardio. Not sure why that would be. I haven't tested that theory yet......



    I am cheating a bit. I just started back in with the peps. Ghrp-6 and cjc 1295. these two for me help keep fat build up in check. I was on these two the whole year i was in afghanistan. eating was problematic, and i regularly ate 3k+/cal/day and was doing it "dirty" too. but i never gained much weight the whole time i was there. I'm thinking it may have had something to do with the peps.
    Been reading up on that and have been thinking about doing between cycles. Do you have to refrigerate that stuff? It is subQ right? How about appetite I've read the Ghrp-6 runs appetite through the roof something that may not be good for me. Not sure if my schedule will allow for 3 pins/day every day.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Back from Afghanistan
    Posts
    27,376
    Quote Originally Posted by --->>405<<--- View Post
    390g pro = 1560cals
    300g carbs = 1200 cals
    210g fat = 1890cals

    1560 + 1200 + 1890 = 4650cals

    1560/4650 = 33% pro
    1200/4650 = 25.8% carb
    1890/4650 = 40.6% FAT

    thought u mite wanna see this
    you're right. I was thinking % based on grams, and it should be from cals.

    scary what a little peanut butter can do, huh?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •