Results 1 to 40 of 74

Thread: Hard Work Seems to Not Matter In the End

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by 70sAesthetics View Post
    I agree with this. Although, By about the beginning of 2nd year I knew how to train for my body. The 3rd year was more so, what can I do to shock it a little more. So now weve established if diet is perfect. And proper training is aquired through experience this is the only purpose of base? As in i could have juiced last year. I always felt there was more of a reason to hit near genetic limit first. But I suppose thats only to "maximize" total gains Ie a pro career?



    I dunno maybe your right but. I started out at 152lbs at 12%. Then I cut for boxing to about 140lbs and I was like an aushwitz survivor. I then got to 182lbs and was able to see shoulder striations. The following year I got to 190lbs in 2 years at 10% and take in mind I do not train legs so there is alot of extra weight I could gain there. This year I figured if I cut down to around 10-12% id be near 200lbs. Your probably right though, i dont cut to contest weight




    You don't train legs? Wtf is wrong with you? I don't even know what to say........

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    12,796
    Quote Originally Posted by Perseverance1 View Post
    You don't train legs? Wtf is wrong with you? I don't even know what to say........
    X2^^^

    Ur gonna hit ur "genetic limit" and u dont train legs? A fundamental aspect of bodybuilding...

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Perseverance1 View Post
    You don't train legs? Wtf is wrong with you? I don't even know what to say........
    Quote Originally Posted by --->>405<<--- View Post
    X2^^^

    Ur gonna hit ur "genetic limit" and u dont train legs? A fundamental aspect of bodybuilding...
    I train for looks and because I like it. Im not competing therefore there is no rulebook dictating how i have to train.

    I have naturally big legs. Within 1.5 months of training on a cut, i decided to do legs. My squats went from 185lbs ATG to 375lbs ATG. My quads got very big, and even my 36 width dress pants started looking tight and ridiculous. I dont want tree trunk legs of peace.

    And inb4 I hear legs help everything else grow. This is a myth. I grow more when I can get away with more and tax my cns and energy levels less. I can do this by more upper body emphasis and no legs

    I have tried just squats and sldl for funcionalitys sake but even those 2 cause my legs to grow fast

  4. #4
    kelkel's Avatar
    kelkel is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~ No Source Checks
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East Coast Dungeon
    Posts
    29,919
    Quote Originally Posted by 70sAesthetics View Post
    I train for looks and because I like it. Im not competing therefore there is no rulebook dictating how i have to train. Absolutely correct. Just the sudden revelation of no leg training flies in the face of the entire rest of the thread

    I have naturally big legs. Within 1.5 months of training on a cut, i decided to do legs. My squats went from 185lbs ATG to 375lbs ATG. My quads got very big, and even my 36 width dress pants started looking tight and ridiculous. I dont want tree trunk legs of peace. Yet you seem to want a big upper body. Is balance important or are your legs (and calves) in really good shape naturally

    And inb4 I hear legs help everything else grow. This is a myth. I grow more when I can get away with more and tax my cns and energy levels less. I can do this by more upper body emphasis and no legs. Your misinformed. Intense exercise that tax the entire body does in fact release more GH. Just google it or read one of the many studies on Pubmed.

    I have tried just squats and sldl for funcionalitys sake but even those 2 cause my legs to grow fast
    Now, before everyone else asks, post a pic of these bad boys.

    I'm really not trying to jump on you here but you just don't seem to be making sense, IMO.
    Last edited by kelkel; 12-02-2012 at 03:30 PM.

  5. #5
    just measured quads are 26" after not training legs in nearly 2 yrs

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •