Results 1 to 40 of 69

Thread: Standard first dianabol cycle questions

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Montréal
    Posts
    285
    Quote Originally Posted by chadcuz1985 View Post
    So basically what you are saying is you have zero credibility here? Because pulling a youtube vid is not a credible source. Thanks for the laugh.
    Sorry to pop your homoeopathic bubble lol So if I would post a Stephen Hawking video on youtube about black holes it would not be a credible source for you then? A Neil deGrasse Tyson video on astronomy on youtube is not credible? Stop it already you're embarrassing yourself! What would be more credible then? A book where they say the exact same thing? lol

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by DFRELAT View Post
    Sorry to pop your homoeopathic bubble lol So if I would post a Stephen Hawking video on youtube about black holes it would not be a credible source for you then? A Neil deGrasse Tyson video on astronomy on youtube is not credible? Stop it already you're embarrassing yourself! What would be more credible then? A book where they say the exact same thing? lol
    If you were to link a YouTube video as a reference to a dissertation you're writing, would that be accepted regardless of whose video it was?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Montréal
    Posts
    285
    Quote Originally Posted by Docd187123 View Post
    If you were to link a YouTube video as a reference to a dissertation you're writing, would that be accepted regardless of whose video it was?
    Ah but I don't have world renowned recognition like these two have, pretty safe bet to say that something like 90% of the world's scientific community would be in agreement with them! Besides, arguments from authority are pretty weak to start with.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Montréal
    Posts
    285
    What I find interesting in the abstract of the second link (Darke - 2014 - Journal of Forensic Sciences - Wiley Online Library) It says like I was saying yesterday about the 3 deaths on the cdc site were heart related, here they say: 'In 23 of 24 cases, substances other than steroids were detected, most commonly psychostimulants (66.7%).' Hmmm pretty interesting psychostimulants now that really messes up your heart pretty good, they don't say wich ones but here is a possible list: methanphetamine, cocaine, pseudoephedrine, caffeine, MDMA etc... So pretty much what I was saying yesterday, only 3 deaths from the millions of people in the US who take aas, pretty damn low (compaed to say aspirine or tylenol) and of those 3 deaths we can assume they weren''t just taking aas.

    This nonsense has to stop I never said taking steroids is perfectly safe, just like any other medication they have side effects. I also never encouraged him to take steroidss. All I'm saying is to give proper advice, proper facts, not to judge and keep your morals to yourself, let people decide for themselves. It's their choice, their lives. Using bogeyman scare tactics is not the way to go!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •