Cycle comments - Test E & Tren E

[AR's King Silabolin]

So no HCG is not necessary, it doesn't matter if you've done four thousand cycles without it and haven't died. What matters is that it does help minimize issues with the cycle, you even admitted it yourself.

So why even bother telling everyone who reads this read that it isn't necessary? What purpose does it serve other than increasing the risk that they may attempt a cycle without it? Any cycle is better with HCG, so stop recommending crap, just like NACH said.

EDIT: Oh Lord have mercy. I just read your comment about DNA. As someone who has graduate level education and work experience as a geneticist I can tell you that your understanding of the human body in regards to genetics is way off base.

You don't stop a compound and revert back to some mythical genetic state of equilibrium. Do you understand the concept of epigenetics?

He asked, is it necessary? Its not. It will minimize short term recovery issues. Endocrine issues that is. For lipids and other more serious conditions it will not do shit. And that endocrin thing is short term. For lifelong testlevel and natty production it will if any make thing worse. Its ileagal. It has sideeffects.
Oh lord...you really dont get it. Yes, its better to run HCG on cycle or even post cycle. Its speeds up recovery and it makes sure the balls dont fall to sleep and have to be awakened afterwards. But, coming off roids are a pain in the ass anyway and even if i never tried hcg, its always the same store from EVERYBODY. When you quit, the gains will fade away. Conclusion, HCG is not necessary but for optimal recovery its necessary but optimal recovery is not necessary. Meaning, if you can get it, use it, if not, its should not be an argue for going natty.

Well Mr DNA-doc. Its not necessary to bring in scientific Words. If your natty benchpress 1 Max rep is 140 kg, a good cycle will give you 160, but when the drugs are gone, its will drop to 140 like a fart in the wind, cause 140 is written in your DNA. You know...DNA..color of eyes, your heigh, sexual orientation and natty benchpress 1MR.

All this reminds me of the deca-only-cycle.thread. Its a great forum, but old dogs in here are too stuck in the Box compared to other communities.

[tarmyg]

He asked, is it necessary? Its not. It will minimize short term recovery issues. Endocrine issues that is. For lipids and other more serious conditions it will not do shit. And that endocrin thing is short term. For lifelong testlevel and natty production it will if any make thing worse. Its ileagal. It has sideeffects.
Oh lord...you really dont get it. Yes, its better to run HCG on cycle or even post cycle. Its speeds up recovery and it makes sure the balls dont fall to sleep and have to be awakened afterwards. But, coming off roids are a pain in the ass anyway and even if i never tried hcg, its always the same store from EVERYBODY. When you quit, the gains will fade away. Conclusion, HCG is not necessary but for optimal recovery its necessary but optimal recovery is not necessary. Meaning, if you can get it, use it, if not, its should not be an argue for going natty.

Well Mr DNA-doc. Its not necessary to bring in scientific Words. If your natty benchpress 1 Max rep is 140 kg, a good cycle will give you 160, but when the drugs are gone, its will drop to 140 like a fart in the wind, cause 140 is written in your DNA. You know...DNA..color of eyes, your heigh, sexual orientation and natty benchpress 1MR.

All this reminds me of the deca-only-cycle.thread. Its a great forum, but old dogs in here are too stuck in the Box compared to other communities.

Your attitude is super nonchalant and arrogant and I have no idea why! Clearly everyone, with the exception of me knows way more than you on this subject but you have decided to argue about things people discovered as a necessity a decade ago, again I ask why? So my grandpa smoked 65 years, never got lung cancer, do that prove cigarettes do not cause lung cancer? This is essentially your attitude and again, why?