
Originally Posted by
MuscleScience
My thought processes wasn't about global warming. It was to merely show how "alternate facts," work. If you really wanted a debate. I can pull paper after paper after paper that talks about man made climate change, which from all the science I have seen is true. I was just showing how it's actually disingenious to stand on a stage and say 97% of climate scientist agree, while it's a fact of one empirical paper. It is not representive of the opinion of the entire community. Things like that turn people from the science which is counter productive.
I also merely meant that all the evidence about Trump being a Nazi Is well, there is none. That's my fault I should have Been more clear.
When you don't like someone or the way a debate is going, there is a principle called "Godwin's Law." Which again, is counter productive and is why I and many left leaning people left the Democratic Party. When I hear the extreme left shout down a speaker, call them racist or a fascist, beat up their supports and intimidate people at the ballot box and then call them Nazis for supporting the other guy. The irony is oh so obvious, it gets my why people can't see it. The Nazis had squads called the "brown shirts," that were thugs that beat up the opposition. The Communist had them to. That is fascism on display.