How bad are AAS' for you really?

[guitarzan]

That 97% of scientists deal is a lie. I will have have to go back and research how they came up with that number, but it's very misleading. Even the guy that started the weather channel said it's bs.

[borlef]

That 97% of scientists deal is a lie. I will have have to go back and research how they came up with that number, but it's very misleading. Even the guy that started the weather channel said it's bs.

No it's not. If you'd like to go scientist by scientist and get their quotes on endorsing or denying, go ahead. You'll find out for yourself.

The guy is a business man. Listen to his scientists. I know I do, because my sister is married to one who used to work there and now works for the national weather service. Not a single person at his office denies man made climate change.

[kelkel]

I know I do, because my sister is married to one who used to work there and now works for the national weather service. Not a single person at his office denies man made climate change.

Well, the founder of the Weather Channel would dispute that claim. And no doubt it would be job suicide for the employees to deny it....

[borlef]

Well, the founder of the Weather Channel would dispute that claim. And no doubt it would be job suicide for the employees to deny it....

He was CEO for a year before being pushed out. And went back to doing his original job... being a weathercaster! He has no science background.

He claimed polar ice caps are increasing and so are polar bear populations. Clearly incredibly wrong. He's an idiot. Go find video of Steve Ballmer, microsoft ceo, talking about how every apple product ever will be a flop. Good call there Stevie. The weather channel guy is a weathercaster, not a scientist, and hasn't been with the weather channel in 30 years.

[TRA]

That 97% of scientists deal is a lie. I will have have to go back and research how they came up with that number, but it's very misleading. Even the guy that started the weather channel said it's bs.

Absolutely correct! There is a big scandal where the numbers were distorted, and it isn't conspiracy theory, it's plain fact - there is a bunch of incorrect, in fact, blatantly fraudulent data in addition to the 97% b.s. But he isn't interested in FACTS, he is interested in dogma, like the other 97% of political party followers.