Results 1 to 24 of 24
  1. 01-26-2003, 09:22 PM #1
    Yung Wun
    Yung Wun is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    In The Chocolate Factory
    Posts
    698

    Tampa Bay Superbowl CHamps

    The bucks D crushed Oak
    three int's returned for Td's
    the last one was just beautiful
    finally the bucks own the lombardi
    The D juss applied pressured and let mr.Gannon have it
    TAMPA BAY BUCKS SUPERBOWL CHAMPS
    sorry raider fans pack those spikes up and try again next year
    Last edited by Yung Wun; 01-26-2003 at 09:38 PM.
  2. 01-26-2003, 09:44 PM #2
    Terinox's Avatar
    Terinox
    Terinox is offline The One & Only
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,000
    I am NOT a big football fan NOR do i know anything about football and their players (details that is). I know the game though, and I watched cause I knew it would be faily good. And I have to say Gannon just sucks. They should have put in their backup Quarter Back in!
  3. 01-26-2003, 09:50 PM #3
    Yung Wun
    Yung Wun is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    In The Chocolate Factory
    Posts
    698
    Gannon did play shitty threw five int's in the game
    cant believe this guy was the mvp of the league
    the bucks D made him look pittiful
    i'm happy i put my money on the bucks
  4. 01-26-2003, 09:50 PM #4
    nuke
    nuke is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    677
    All I have to say is to all the non-believers we did it !!!

    Pete, 27 years bro We fucking did it !! Hands down no bad calls, no excuses...
    BTW- Barret is an idiot, the whole team should kick his ass !!!


    GO BUCS !!
  5. 01-26-2003, 11:38 PM #5
    Terinox's Avatar
    Terinox
    Terinox is offline The One & Only
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,000
    Yeah the Tampa defense was just WAY too strong. They rushed the quarter back VERY fast, quite impressive. Weren't they like the number one defense in their conference or something like that?

    Either way, good game, I think it was Gannon who lost it for the Raiders, and that shitty white colored jersey's didn't help
  6. 01-27-2003, 01:01 AM #6
    tt333
    tt333 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,474
    The old men couldnt pull it off. Bucs gave them an ass whoopin and it wasnt even a good game.
  7. 01-27-2003, 09:45 AM #7
    Yung Wun
    Yung Wun is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    In The Chocolate Factory
    Posts
    698
    bucks had the number one rated defence
    the game didnt get interesting till after the jerry rice td
    but uptil that time it was all about old men getting a old school beat down by the new school kids
    warren sapp and simeon rice lead the beat down
  8. 01-27-2003, 11:01 AM #8
    mammoth's Avatar
    mammoth
    mammoth is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Georgia @ 6'8"/290lbs
    Posts
    975
    It also didn't hurt that Gruden and his staff did a superb job at preparing the Bucs for the Raiders. Apparently Oakland ran all the exact same plays that the Bucs practiced against. I wonder if Oakland kept the playbook that Gruden used?

    I don't necessarily think that the loss was all Gannon's. He did throw some spot-on passes. Oaklands recievers kept dropping passes.

    Time for Rice and Romanowski to retire!!
    Last edited by mammoth; 01-27-2003 at 11:03 AM.
  9. 01-27-2003, 11:04 AM #9
    chinups Guest
    Jeremy Shockey for President!!!!

    GO BLUE!
  10. 01-27-2003, 01:34 PM #10
    Yung Wun
    Yung Wun is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    In The Chocolate Factory
    Posts
    698
    Originally posted by mammoth
    Time for Rice and Romanowski to retire!!
    dont forget about Timmy and woodson
  11. 01-27-2003, 05:22 PM #11
    tt333
    tt333 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,474
    Gannon was horrible. Thats the worse game he has played all year. He's a pocket passer all the way and if you can shake him up in the first few series, he's probally not going to have a good game. His O-line wasnt blocking worth a damn. But the Bucs D was awsome.
  12. 01-27-2003, 05:29 PM #12
    Buddha_Red's Avatar
    Buddha_Red
    Buddha_Red is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Pasadena, Texas
    Posts
    1,688
    i watched that game. the bucs just dominated the raiders.

    Did yall see all those failed 3 point conversions after the touchdowns?
    They just got out played yesterday.

    overall a nasty game, i really expected a defense game with low low scores.
  13. 01-27-2003, 05:37 PM #13
    mammoth's Avatar
    mammoth
    mammoth is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Georgia @ 6'8"/290lbs
    Posts
    975
    Originally posted by Buddha_Red
    Did yall see all those failed 3 point conversions after the touchdowns?
    They just got out played yesterday.
    Hmm. did I miss a major rule change or something?
  14. 01-27-2003, 05:38 PM #14
    mammoth's Avatar
    mammoth
    mammoth is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Georgia @ 6'8"/290lbs
    Posts
    975
    Originally posted by Yung Wun


    dont forget about Timmy and woodson
    ]

    ESPECIALLY Woodson!!
  15. 01-27-2003, 10:51 PM #15
    saboudian's Avatar
    saboudian
    saboudian is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Michigan State University
    Posts
    1,528
    Originally posted by mammoth


    Hmm. did I miss a major rule change or something?
    The raiders went for the 2 point conversion 3 times and failed every time.
  16. 01-28-2003, 05:51 AM #16
    Pete235's Avatar
    Pete235
    Pete235 is offline Retired Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,289
    Originally posted by nuke
    All I have to say is to all the non-believers we did it !!!

    Pete, 27 years bro We fucking did it !! Hands down no bad calls, no excuses...
    Nuke my brother, I'm just gonna sit here with a big ass smile on my face and wait until the "Tampa Bay Bucaneers - Superbowl Champions" starter caps hit the market I am very happy...just as happy as the first time the Colorado Avalance won Lord Stanleys Cup!
  17. 01-28-2003, 07:03 AM #17
    fullback40
    fullback40 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    84


    The first but certainly not the last Bucs Hall of Famer
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Tampa Bay Superbowl CHamps-1976selmon.jpg  
  18. 01-28-2003, 07:42 AM #18
    Fullback57's Avatar
    Fullback57
    Fullback57 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    349
    If the Bucs are able to keep the bulk of their defensive and offensive core's they're gonna have a dynasty in Tampa Bay
  19. 01-28-2003, 08:02 AM #19
    mammoth's Avatar
    mammoth
    mammoth is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Georgia @ 6'8"/290lbs
    Posts
    975
    Originally posted by saboudian


    The raiders went for the 2 point conversion 3 times and failed every time.
    Yeah I know I saw the game. Look closely at the quote in that particular post.
  20. 01-28-2003, 01:07 PM #20
    Big Rush's Avatar
    Big Rush
    Big Rush is offline The Juice Man
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Wal-Mart
    Posts
    3,498
    You all know what the worst part of all this was/is? The New Orleans Saints beat the Bucs two times during the season! Yet, the Bengals whooped there ass in there last game...go figure, huh?
  21. 01-29-2003, 05:26 AM #21
    Pete235's Avatar
    Pete235
    Pete235 is offline Retired Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,289
    Originally posted by Big Rush
    You all know what the worst part of all this was/is? The New Orleans Saints beat the Bucs two times during the season! Yet, the Bengals whooped there ass in there last game...go figure, huh?
    It's an odd sport sometimes. The last time the Bucs played Detroit they only managed 5 field goals...no majors at all!!
  22. 01-29-2003, 08:13 AM #22
    nuke
    nuke is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    677
    Petey, I will send you one. Brother you deserve it....We deserve it. You should have seen the parade yesterday bro. 100,000 plus in attendance !!

    GO BUCS !!!
  23. 01-30-2003, 11:24 PM #23
    xplicit
    xplicit is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    881
    The bucs have been a dynasty on d for the past 3-4 years and if the offense would have been above average in that time they would have made the superbowl in 99 AND THEN everyone would argree the team is a dynasty. But with the salary cap and the freedom to cut players at any time and not pay them its hard to keep a team together and even harder to keep a dynasty so in todays football world you have to give a team like the bucs credit for having a dynasty and even the rams cause the rams put together a string of 3 great years 2 sb appearense and 1 win. You wont see dynastys like the steelers cowboys or niners anymore.

    100,000 is a lot of people, in 96 the yanks won and had 2 millions at the ticker tape parade in the cold all bundled up when u look at aerial shots of that it looks like 20 million people.

    I will the niners didnt come back and beat the giants this year cause our offense was really clicking and i think the giants would have played the bucs better then oakland. Collins is very underrated and is one of the few QBS who has an arm and likes to throw downfield, and we had dixon back and shockey and toomar were peaking tiki has always been great oh man i would have loved to watch that game.
    GIANTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lol
  24. 01-30-2003, 11:45 PM #24
    xplicit
    xplicit is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    881
    Giants are picking up terry tate next season
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules