Results 1 to 40 of 54
-
02-20-2004, 03:47 PM #1
Who is the worst president in History???
Something to think about.
The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter to the
Editor.
Liberal Democrats claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war.
They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed
Bush was the worst president in U.S. history. Let's clear up one point:
We didn't start the war on terror.
Try to remember, terrorists started it on 9/11. (Probably long before 9/11)
Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did.
From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never
Attacked us.
From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of, 18,333 per year.
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never
Attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975,
58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia
Never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter
Three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple
Occasions.
In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has
Liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put
Nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot,
And captured a terrorist who Slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We lost 600 soldiers, an average Of 300 a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another
Terrorist attack at home.The answer to your every question
Rules
A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted
to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially
one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.
If you get scammed by an UGL listed on this board or by another member here, it's all part of the game and learning experience for you,
we do not approve nor support any sources that may be listed on this site.
I will not do source checks for you, the peer review from other members should be enough to help you make a decision on your quest. Buyer beware.
Don't Let the Police kick your ass
-
02-20-2004, 04:15 PM #2Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 306
I usually don't post in these political threads, but before we start saying Bush "liberated" any countries lets give it a bit more time. The US has apparently "liberated" countries before and that has backfired on them in no small way.
Thats just my opinion. I don't want to start any arguments on this thread....just tossin in my 2 cents..
-
02-20-2004, 05:13 PM #3AR-Hall of Famer / Retired
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Location
- Wherever necessary
- Posts
- 7,846
true - but considering clintons record of liberation Hati, somalia, Bosnia - and those just being small states - Bush could screw it up pretty bad and still be way ahead of that
-
02-20-2004, 05:30 PM #4
not a bush fan.......I say he's the worst....
-
02-20-2004, 05:31 PM #5Originally Posted by hoss827
-
02-20-2004, 05:34 PM #6
In a way....bush is sortof a tyrant.....jmo though
-
02-20-2004, 05:39 PM #7
agree.. Not a Fan of Bush.. Maybe if he Liked AS I would be but NO..
-
02-20-2004, 05:40 PM #8
"FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did.
From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year"
please tell me this is a joke. they cannot be serious. I remember awhile back all my right-winged buddies were so quick to relate sadam to hitler. and used that as some justification. now this comes out and fdr is a bad president for leading us into wwII? first off, Japan did attack us, so we declared war on japan. as germany was japans ally, they declared war on us. so in return we declared war on germany. All this "Preemptive thread" bull**** that bush has been preaching... you support his war but when a REAL thread (declaring war is a real threat) is annoucned you bash fdr for leading us to victory and saving the world from being overrun? not to mention ending the great depression???
this is right-winged propaganda, nothing more. i could skew facts from any president we have ever had and make it look slanderous.
besides Nixon was the worst he was certifiably crazy.
ps. dont call me a liberal tree hugger because im not liberal or a tree hugger thanks
-
02-20-2004, 05:45 PM #9
treehugger... Just messin with ya bro lol
-
02-20-2004, 05:47 PM #10
i believe Reagans admin was the most corrupt. I think like 20 of his cabinet members went to prison. Next was Nixon...i believe.
-
02-20-2004, 08:32 PM #11
George Washington.......cause he just will not stay in my pocket for very long!!!!
-
02-20-2004, 08:48 PM #12
I'd have to say Nixon
-
02-20-2004, 10:16 PM #13
You guys aren't even close. Andrew Johnson was the worst by far.
-
02-21-2004, 02:32 AM #14
I dont believe Carter was a favorite.
-
02-21-2004, 02:51 AM #15
Calvin Cooledge (1920-1928) set policies in place that precipitated the Great Depression. It took his sucessor, Hoover (1928-1932), a while to figure out solutions to the economic problems, but since the Wall Street Crash of 1929 happened on his watch, voters blamed him. When Franklin Roosevelt took office, he used many of Hoover's ideas to fix things, and they worked pretty well.
Hoover's reputation in the 1930's was pretty bad. Undeserved, though.
-
02-21-2004, 03:07 AM #16
Herbert Hoover admired by Bush I and Bush II was the worst of the president 20th century. FDR saved us from his ineptness and apathy toward the average American.
-
02-21-2004, 03:59 AM #17
Im not much into the presidents but I know there have to be presidents that just amounted to NOTHING. Clinton got things done, reagon, bush, nixxon , carter, kennedy lincoln ford, etc. But ask your history teachers about the presidents that most people like me dont know about. The ones who reallly ****ed up the economy.
I like how SPY started a thread supporting Bush and then the demos come in and say this thread is proposterous and we are spewing crap. Then when demos start a thread bashing bush or supporting clinton, repubs go in and say the same thing.
Once again. This thread will lead to IRAQ and how we should not be there and how Bush is a tyrant. Oh. It has already gotten to that in just 13 posts.
-
02-21-2004, 08:04 AM #18
Bros, I don't think this thread is very fair...
As much as I hate politicians in general, I have to admit that every president, prime minister, premier or whatever has a different challenge to meet, a different political climate, economical and geopolitical climate... and of course a different team of people supporting them.
Taking that into consideration, I think judging *any* world leaders performance by comparing him to others is like comparing apples and oranges...
Just my 2 cents worth of course.
Red
-
02-21-2004, 08:07 AM #19Originally Posted by bermich
I stay out of politics if all possible....but there are some things Buch does I don't agree with....hell there has been something that all presidents during my life time have done I don't agree with....there that's as far as I go, good day.
-
02-21-2004, 09:05 AM #20
But which president was just a mistake that EVERYONE agrees on. Democrats and republicans alike. That leaves Clinton, Bushes, Reagons out. Which of our presidents deserved to kicked by a donkey due to stupidity. Maybe he didnt know where Mexico or Canada was located. Maybe he thought you could drive to Hawaii. If Al Gore was president, I would nominate him.
-
02-21-2004, 10:43 AM #21
Bermich that's priceless.
-
02-21-2004, 10:02 PM #22
[QUOTE=bermich]
I like how SPY started a thread supporting Bush and then the demos come in and say this thread is proposterous and we are spewing crap. Then when demos start a thread bashing bush or supporting clinton, repubs go in and say the same thing.
QUOTE]
You like that? How odd . . .
Different strokes, I guess . . .
--Tock
-
02-21-2004, 10:05 PM #23Originally Posted by bermich
Hands down, that would be Ricard Nixon. The guy thought he was above the law, that he could commit crimes and not be held accountable.
-TockLast edited by Tock; 02-22-2004 at 08:28 PM. Reason: misspelling
-
02-21-2004, 10:20 PM #24
al gore
al gore for president? you gotta be kidding! lol. im from tennessee so i know how al does things. i dont agree with alot of what bush has done but im sure glad al wasnt president when 911 happened! he would have whinned and bitched about it and not have acted.
-
02-22-2004, 12:20 AM #25Originally Posted by DF2003
Or he would have stopped giving aid to afghanistan. Thats about it.
-
02-22-2004, 02:07 AM #26
lol
lol. yea i mean he's a good man and all but he's not cut out to be a nations leader! now you know who would make a great pres. rudy giuliani. sorry to hijack!
Originally Posted by bermich
-
02-22-2004, 02:11 AM #27Originally Posted by DF2003
Yah, I could vote for him . . . Republican and all.
-tock
-
02-22-2004, 08:59 AM #28
Worst...Grant, Lincoln and Kennedy were without a doubt the worst for the US. Alcoholic sloth of a General responsible for the Spoils Systems, another initiated Civil War, ol JFK was the son of bootleggers that in all actuality allowed the US involvment in Vietnam...restrained the hands of US servicemen from annhilating of Commie rice eaters...supported Commies, but acted like he was keeping the world safe from them...(he did hump M. Monore..thumbs up for that!)
Last edited by BamaSlamma; 02-22-2004 at 09:03 AM.
-
02-22-2004, 09:19 AM #29
lol
lol.
Originally Posted by BamaSlamma
-
02-22-2004, 09:20 AM #30
the next worse
ill tell ya who will be the next worse pres. hitlery clinton 2008!
-
02-22-2004, 09:53 AM #31
richard nixon
-
02-22-2004, 04:24 PM #32
Definately JIMMY CARTER has been the worst
This "Human Rights Champion" was practically in bed with the powers in Moscow. He attacked Democratic countries for human rights violations and CHOSE TO IGNORE the massacres of thousands in China, Russia, and Cuba.
He used the PRETEXT of human rights to advance his Socialist ideals. (Stalinist ideals)
great example:
He let Nicaragua fall to Communism, by ousting (sent letters "urging him to abandon office") democratically elected president and letting the Sandinistas imprison thousands of political prisoners and perform countless Human Rights violations. He never cut aid to the Sandinist government.
It is because of Ronald Reagan and Oliver North that Nicaragua is a free country today. Through their CIA support of the "Contras" (democratic freedom fighters consisting of indigenous northern Indians, Mestizos and former Guardia members) and 10 years of civil war, The Sandinistas relented and agreed to Democratic Elections in 1990 where the poulation overwhelmingly elected Violeta Chamorro, a politically conservative woman who led the country away from crime, human right abuses, poverty and communism.
-
02-22-2004, 06:39 PM #33
true that............
Hey.......... I simply posted something i saw in a newspaper...
Glad to see you all are enjoying it..........
have a nice day........ and do all of society a favor............
get a Vasectomy.......
Originally Posted by DF2003The answer to your every question
Rules
A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted
to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially
one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.
If you get scammed by an UGL listed on this board or by another member here, it's all part of the game and learning experience for you,
we do not approve nor support any sources that may be listed on this site.
I will not do source checks for you, the peer review from other members should be enough to help you make a decision on your quest. Buyer beware.
Don't Let the Police kick your ass
-
02-22-2004, 06:52 PM #34
To many to name
-
02-22-2004, 07:01 PM #35
I just have the feeling that we are trying to finish off the bully that "hurt my daddy"...just finishing up family business.
-Cy
-
02-22-2004, 08:01 PM #36
Carter
-
02-22-2004, 08:51 PM #37
Bush is one of the best..........4 more years
-
02-22-2004, 09:21 PM #38
Wilson was one of the best . . . they don't elect 'em like that any more . . .
--Tock
-
02-23-2004, 01:41 AM #39Originally Posted by Tock
Anyway, this is a perfect example of a right wing bias thread, just like you demos like to throw out with unemployment and defficit figures. They just attack it from a different point.
As far as the worst president...i'll go fdr. Not for the wwII, he inherited a mess of a country. He is noted by some as the best president of all time and also the worst. He did what he had to at the time but our country paid the price later. Those social programs, although needed at the time, set the ball rolling that has eventually led us to our problems in the future...social security. Had that not been put in place, we wouldn't be faced with the issue here that will have me paying out the ass in about 9 years when it fails. Of cource, it is always debateable depending on one's views, but I say fdr for social security...the real problem of the future of our country
-
02-23-2004, 02:20 AM #40
Originally Posted by Tock
Calvin Cooledge (1920-1928) set policies in place that precipitated the Great Depression. It took his sucessor, Hoover (1928-1932), a while to figure out solutions to the economic problems, but since the Wall Street Crash of 1929 happened on his watch, voters blamed him. When Franklin Roosevelt took office, he used many of Hoover's ideas to fix things, and they worked pretty well.
Hoover's reputation in the 1930's was pretty bad. Undeserved, though.
-------------------
1)Originally Posted by 50%Natural
1) Huh?
2) Huh . . .
3) Those social programs were pretty small at the time. I don't know if they hoped they would grow into the huge things they are now, but it was later Congresses that voted to increase their scope.
I kinda think that with the low savings rate most people have nowadays, that when they reach retirement age, there really isn't going to be enough $$$ in either Social Security or in their personal accounts to keep them out of abject poverty. If enough folks end up in that unhappy position, you can bet they'll vote for politicians who will create some solutions that conservatives would consider rather unsatisfactory. I think you can expect to see the initial rumblings of this in about 20 years. In 50 years, this country will be radically different.
But that's neither here nor there . . .
Geez, why do people use that phrase?
--Tock
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Dutasteride dosage while on and...
Today, 06:43 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS