Thread: Which is more cost effective?
03-23-2002, 01:47 PM #1
03-23-2002, 02:19 PM #2
Doesn't liquidex run $200+ a vial? At least that's what I heard. I don't want to spend more on anit-e's than I do on gear.
03-23-2002, 02:21 PM #3Originally posted by sk*
Remember that nolvadex hinders gains, I would only use it if signs came about and would never attempt to run it along with my cycle. [/B]
03-23-2002, 02:22 PM #4Originally posted by Diesel
Are you gyno prone?
03-23-2002, 02:25 PM #5Retired Moderator
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
nolvadex hinders gains due to lack of water retention caused when using it alongside aas as well as through a reduction in igf1 via estrogen, so anything that prevents aromatisation of steroids or conversion to estrogen you will prevent gains. from the two choices the first with proviron and nolva. if you can afford arrimidex/liquidex then do so but it may not make the greatest deal of difference
03-23-2002, 02:29 PM #6
Thanks for the help guys. Keep the advice coming.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)