Which is more cost effective?

**latman49** · 03-23-2002, 02:47 PM

Running 50mg/day of Proviron with some Nolva handy just in case, or running Nolvadex 20/mg day throughout a cycle of Enan/Eq/dbol ?

**latman49** · 03-23-2002, 03:19 PM

Doesn't liquidex run $200+ a vial? At least that's what I heard. I don't want to spend more on anit-e's than I do on gear.

**latman49** · 03-23-2002, 03:21 PM

Originally posted by sk*
Remember that nolvadex hinders gains, I would only use it if signs came about and would never attempt to run it along with my cycle. [/B]

That's why I was leaning more toward the Proviron , I have to keep fat and water retention as low as I can without throwing my gains away.

**latman49** · 03-23-2002, 03:22 PM

Originally posted by Diesel
Are you gyno prone?

Don't know, this will be my 1st cycle.

**The Iron Game** · 03-23-2002, 03:25 PM

nolvadex hinders gains due to lack of water retention caused when using it alongside aas as well as through a reduction in igf1 via estrogen, so anything that prevents aromatisation of steroids or conversion to estrogen you will prevent gains. from the two choices the first with proviron and nolva. if you can afford arrimidex/liquidex then do so but it may not make the greatest deal of difference