Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Titan1 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    624

    Difference in injecting parts of body


  2. #2
    Heracles74's Avatar
    Heracles74 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    1,196
    good post.

  3. #3
    Juggernaut's Avatar
    Juggernaut is offline AR Jester
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    6,545
    Let's pretend I was educated in the penal system and explain what it is I'm looking at............in fact, just go with the fact I was educated in the penal system.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    2,393
    The Minto Studies. Those are the ones I used in my deca profile on this board to show:

    Shooting in larger muscles give you higher blood plasma levels....
    Shorter esters do that also...
    More highly concentrated gear has this effect as well...

    I posted about this on AF many years ago, and on BB4L a few years ago...I always wondered why it took so long for people at AR to find all of this out.

  5. #5
    Recklace's Avatar
    Recklace is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    160
    So is that saying that shooting up in your delt is the best place for absortion?

  6. #6
    Juggernaut's Avatar
    Juggernaut is offline AR Jester
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    6,545
    So shooting into larger muscles groups are better with absorbtion?

  7. #7
    JdFlex's Avatar
    JdFlex is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,158
    Quote Originally Posted by Recklace
    So is that saying that shooting up in your delt is the best place for absortion?
    No. Its says that b/w the glute and delt, the glute had more absorption.

  8. #8
    JdFlex's Avatar
    JdFlex is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,158
    Quote Originally Posted by Juggernaut
    So shooting into larger muscles groups are better with absorbtion?
    The study showed that b/w shooting into the glute and delt, the glute provided better absorption. The glute is a larger muscle. But I don't know that we should assume any larger muscle is better at absorbing than smaller muscles.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    2,393
    Actually, I think thats a justifiable position, in general....

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •