01-14-2004, 08:19 PM #1
Higher MG/ML dose VS lower MG/ML doses
I know of a few suppliers who have gear with a higher MG per ML, example test 500mg;mg/ml and tren 200mg/ml...apposed to the normal mg/ml doses. is there any bad with this...for me I like this b/c with the eod injections I can cut the does/ml down so that I dont have to inject so much gear at any one time...im wondering if this might help with absorbtion...
just wondering any thoughts
01-14-2004, 08:22 PM #2
the only bad thing is that sometimes, stuff like test 400 COULD be a little underdosed
01-14-2004, 08:24 PM #3
The high mg stuff hurts like HELL!! thats the most important difference IMO
01-14-2004, 08:33 PM #4
why would it hurt more VS a lower mg stuff...my concern is that I can get both lower and higher mg for the same price...I was just thinking that i could inject less about each time...which might help with absorption
01-14-2004, 08:35 PM #5
hurt more cause theres more powder per amount of oil!
01-14-2004, 08:37 PM #6
it hurts more because the BA content is a lot higher...
01-14-2004, 08:42 PM #7
so do you think I should go with the lower dose, pain is pain, but I just dont want it to be so much that it keeps me out of the gym..
01-14-2004, 08:45 PM #8
I would go with the lower dose. I can get both but I am going with the lower mg/ml
01-14-2004, 08:46 PM #9
I like lower dosed gear myself.
01-14-2004, 08:52 PM #10
High dosed gear should be diluted with sterile oil.
There's a reason why human-grade gear does not come in high concentrations.
01-14-2004, 09:14 PM #11
but for example if you had a 500mg/ml test eth, you could use .5ml one day and .5ml on another at the end of the week you will have 500mg, plus with the smaller doses you blood levels should be more stable. and with the such a small dose it couldnt hurt that much??
01-14-2004, 09:23 PM #12
higher dosed gear tends to come from less reputable labs like tornell...isa...etc
01-14-2004, 09:27 PM #13
Higher-dosed gear, more than anything else, is a way for labs to get more product on hte market cheaper and quicker than making normal, or average, concentration gear. You also get more loss per injection with higer concentration gear.
Also, it will make no difference as to the absorbtion of the hormone.
01-15-2004, 02:56 AM #14
I'm wary of higher dosed gear. Seems more likely to be underdosed.
01-15-2004, 06:09 AM #15Originally Posted by HollywoodM3
Just jackin ya bro... but it sounds like you have your mind made up so give it a shot... see what you think, you already know what some of us think.
01-15-2004, 01:09 PM #16
hey hollywood, I use PL high mg gear and I love it, I did get a little sore at first but after about two weeks the sorness went away. I can also say that his gear is not underdosed it is the real deal. I also like the fact that I only have to shoot 1.4cc's a week total compared to 2.8cc's. Oh well that is my 2 cents. T-REX
01-15-2004, 01:14 PM #17
T-400 will make your ass not up to the size of a baseball, so imagine what some vet version of t 500 would do. .5 ml's or not the BA content is high. Whatever you think bro, it may be more economical if you buy the higher dosed stuff.
Whatcha gonna do.....
01-15-2004, 01:58 PM #18Originally Posted by HollywoodM3
01-16-2004, 08:02 AM #19
No pain No gain..right..lol
Im gonna try to higher stuff, if it gets to bad im gonna mix it..I will let you kno
01-16-2004, 08:33 AM #20
Actually, there are several correct answers above, though different.
More Powder crammed into same weight=More pain, consequently, more BA is used on these Gears as well, which =more pain.
Also, if you're using your Test (Or whatever) to mix with other Gear in the in the Same Shot Frequently during the week..i.e. 1/2cc Test, 1cc Tren etc etc, then I guess a Higher Doses shot wouldn't be so bad.
Personally, regardless of ester Length, I think Blood Levels remain more stable with lower dose and/or more frequent shots.
Also, someone mentioned more waste with higher dose shots, and since there is "some" lost in every shot, I would agree that more is wasted with Higher doses shots, since every repeated waste would contain a higher mg/ml Ratio.
01-16-2004, 06:17 PM #21
As long as it doesn't hurt, I prefer the higher mg/ml
01-16-2004, 07:40 PM #22
Higher mg/ml...definately better bang for your buck...alot less injections...or alot more in the same needle.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)