-
05-05-2005, 04:26 PM #1
If you had to choose..would you do IGF or GH??
If you could afford either one, and were in your early twenties, which one would you take first? Or if you could only afford one or the other, which would you take? I could afford about 6 months of humatrope for 6 months at 1.5iu 5on2off or even higher dosage with something like jino obviously. Or I could afford an equal amount in IGF....maybe 3 or so mg's. Whcih one do you think I would see better results off of?
Edit: BTW, I WILL be using slin with either, regardlessLast edited by spound; 05-05-2005 at 08:10 PM.
-
05-05-2005, 04:31 PM #2
igf for muscle mass
-
05-05-2005, 04:36 PM #3Originally Posted by wolfyEVH
-
05-05-2005, 04:37 PM #4
also, what if I could do say 3-4iu of jino 5/2??? would you still say IGF??
-
05-05-2005, 04:48 PM #5
WTF!!! GH OF COURSE!! Damn dude, if you have the moneyfor either, def go with GH, dont even **** with IGF-1 if you got some GH and slin, GH and slin is all you need!!!
-
05-05-2005, 05:07 PM #6Originally Posted by stayinstacked
-
05-05-2005, 06:30 PM #7Originally Posted by stayinstacked
-
05-05-2005, 07:05 PM #8Originally Posted by wallycn
-
05-05-2005, 07:30 PM #9Originally Posted by Nicky B
-
05-05-2005, 07:47 PM #10
I would combine the two. HGH throughout the cycle, igf-1 4 weeks on 4 weeks off. Slin in the off weeks. Can't beat this iMO
-LL
-
05-05-2005, 07:53 PM #11Originally Posted by LL08
-
05-05-2005, 07:54 PM #12Originally Posted by LL08
-
05-05-2005, 08:06 PM #13
if you never used slin before you better not start while your on igf because its dangerous but the 2 together produce great muscle mass results
-
05-05-2005, 08:08 PM #14Originally Posted by pietro75
-LL
-
05-05-2005, 08:09 PM #15Originally Posted by pietro75
-
05-06-2005, 04:55 PM #16Originally Posted by spound
-
05-06-2005, 09:01 PM #17
go with igf if wou wanna chose...when you run a say 4 week cycle and you dont like the resultst (what i cant imagine ), then you can do a hgh cycle after that....when you start hgh you need to take it minimal 16 weeks to see any results of it...
just my 2c,,,greetz
-
05-07-2005, 03:45 AM #18
I personally LOVE IGF, but I would run the GH.
Remember, you have to cycle the IGF, one month on, one month off, but you can stay on the GH non-stop.
-
05-07-2005, 09:35 PM #19
Since I can get IGF and I can't get GH I guess I choose IGF.
-
05-07-2005, 09:38 PM #20Originally Posted by Tuggy
-
05-08-2005, 05:54 AM #21
if your going for growth then i would have to say IGF,after all this is what causes the growth while taking GH.its the effect of GH being passed through the liver that releases igf into the bloodstream.so basically you are cutting out the middle man by using igf.you still get the fat burning properties you would get from gh and i dont know what else you could ask for..oh yeah,its a hell of alot cheaper too..IGF ...hands down
-
05-08-2005, 09:08 AM #22
Thanks for all the input guys, but I am still torn, I am just very curious to se what GH is all about, its just kinda one of those things I want to experience. I think I am gonna have to run both
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SVT and steroids?
04-23-2024, 09:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS