source checks

**donniebrasco** · 10-05-2006, 08:14 PM

howdy, im approaching my 100 posts and really want to get a source checked, how do i go about doing this, are they helpfull.
im pretty sure i have a good lead, just want to make sure first.

**Foskamink** · 10-05-2006, 08:18 PM

do u got 45 days active?

**donniebrasco** · 10-05-2006, 08:20 PM

nooooo, i though it was 45 days or 100 posts, dont tell me you need both.

**donniebrasco** · 10-05-2006, 08:29 PM

and 100, i feel like a milestone has been reached. MODS / VETS WHERE ARE YOU

**italianplayboy09** · 10-05-2006, 11:58 PM

you still need 45 days

**guest589745** · 10-06-2006, 12:07 AM

Yea but what do your posts consist of?

**guest589745** · 10-06-2006, 12:08 AM

I still think they should only do checks with 1,000 posts, 1 year of activity and prove their worth.

**italianplayboy09** · 10-06-2006, 12:11 AM

Originally Posted by Skullsmasher

I still think they should only do checks with 1,000 posts, 1 year of activity and prove their worth.

damn thats a little steep

**guest589745** · 10-06-2006, 12:12 AM

Originally Posted by italianplayboy09

damn thats a little steep

Well we're not playin tiddley-winks here ya know.

**kihop** · 10-06-2006, 12:14 AM

Originally Posted by Skullsmasher

I still think they should only do checks with 1,000 posts, 1 year of activity and prove their worth.

yeah, by that time they'll have discovered places that require 1 post to find a source...

**guest589745** · 10-06-2006, 12:20 AM

Originally Posted by kihop

yeah, by that time they'll have discovered places that require 1 post to find a source...

they will also find out what board has the most useful information as well.

**italianplayboy09** · 10-06-2006, 12:26 AM

Originally Posted by Skullsmasher

Well we're not playin tiddley-winks here ya know.

so say someone who has done previous cycles(assuming they know what theyre doing and have the right stats) lost the only source they had so they came here and asked to get a source check for a source they just found you would deny them b/c they need to be here for a year and have 1,000 posts? i think they way it is now is just fine. mostly everyone that gets a source check done on here is tested with their knowledge based on the fact that they know how to run a proper cycle and have the right stats

**rar1015** · 10-06-2006, 06:05 AM

Your better off just sending a pm to a mod/vet bro, watch out for scammers.

**1819** · 10-06-2006, 06:22 AM

Originally Posted by kihop

yeah, by that time they'll have discovered places that require 1 post to find a source...

then let them go there. the purpose if this board is not to help people find sources. 1000 and a year might be a little steep , but 100 or 45 days is way too little. also before a mod does the source check i hope they review some of the posts before deciding to help. going to the lounge and bumping 100 times should not be allowed or count as a post. vets and mods do this as a courtecy. its not a right. asking for a source check has to be earned.

**cj1capp** · 10-06-2006, 06:28 AM

Originally Posted by Skullsmasher

I still think they should only do checks with 1,000 posts, 1 year of activity and prove their worth.

yeah 1,000 post before any source checks, just kiding

**donniebrasco** · 10-06-2006, 06:31 AM

yeah i now that i and i do truely appreciate it, as when they do it, it is purely done to help someone, like you said it is done as a favour, as its not like we pay a membership fee.
i have been to these other forums that are so open, but for some reason i seem to trust the members of this forum, more than any other forum.
what exactly do they do to check, is there a list of known scammers and they just check it through that.