Zane vs Ruhl

[Flier]

I´m looking at old pics from Larry Scott, Frank Zane and the old pros, and comparing with todays BBs.
I love the old classic look. What happened? Bigger is better?
Zane did AAS. But I wonder how much more Ruhl is pinning. For sure GH in the mix, and probably Synthol. I doubt he´s training harder than Zane.



Imo, Zane´s physique is elegant and impressive, and I would love to look like that. Ruhl is more freakish, and I wouldn´t exchange his body for mine if you gave me $100,000.
What do you think?

[cherrydrpepper]

This is kind of controversial. Hmm. I don't make bodybuilding too complicated. I just want to get my dik wet. Also if I ever turn gay I want to be hot enough to JO in the mirror. Hasn't happened yet.

[paulzane]

I much prefer the old classic look where shape and symmetry meant more. They looked more like atheletes and looked like they could actually use their muscle to do something other than pose on the stage

[JohnnyVegas]

I haven't purchased bodybuilding magazines in years because I don't like the bigger look. I totally respect the big guys, but think it has gone too far. I find it totally unattractive.

[RaginCajun]

i would have to agree with the above.