Results 41 to 43 of 43
-
02-06-2014, 10:02 PM #41
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Standing Above Weakness
- Posts
- 16,033
- Blog Entries
- 2
Originally Posted by lovbyts
-
02-07-2014, 12:27 PM #42Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- The Beach
- Posts
- 1,524
Well then. I hope we can avoid that, but unfortunately, I think you are right.
Too far gone?
-
02-07-2014, 09:24 PM #43
NO. no red flags. the IRS, over 10 or 15 years ago, adopted to use a kinder, gentler, machine gun hand when it comes to scrutinizing the little fish. Yes brother, you are the little fish, and so am I. the IRS has a finite supply of field auditors, and the new policy is for them to only go after the big fish. Joe six pack hasn't been audited in years. the caveat to that statement, is individuals utilizing a variety of schedules, including C.
If you do not exceed any thresholds on charitable contributions, you are fine. only when you start claiming large amounts, and it substantially impacts your tax liability, will someone even look up from reading the sunday funny papers.
really? this is what you think? reality check. Obama has zero to do with tax law or the 14 amendment. I'm not an Obama supporter, but let's try to be factual and not turn this into a political mud slinging event, ok?
we had one once. it's called the 14th amendent, which gave birth to what? INCOME TAX! and the initial tax code was fairly flat. The problem with calling for a flat tax, which is a good idea imho, is that the politicians have the power to add to and change the tax law. so what starts out flat, eventually turns out to be anything but flat.
if the information you gave is accurate, then something else is going on. I'm thinking reducing your taxable income ALSO allowed you to escape from the additional tax referred to as AMT.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS