Results 1 to 40 of 46
-
04-09-2004, 09:39 PM #1
Does wireless internet connection make it harder for Feds to hastle me?
I recently bought myself a wireless internet router, and it works really well. I was wondering if it made things harder for the feds when it comes to tracking internet activities. What do you guys know or think?
-Thanks
-
04-09-2004, 11:50 PM #2
NO. You are still using the internet. You are still using an IP address. The only difference is you dont have wires to trip over in your house.
There are software programs that will help you encrypt your computer files, encrypted email sites and other programs that can help you stay hidden. Takes a lot of research and it is mainly for magor fed criminals. Too much troulbe if you are just doing a couple cycles a year....
-
04-10-2004, 12:20 AM #3
Turn DHCP off, get a firewall, set up a static IP settiing.
But NO, it's not hard for "feds" to track you if they need to.
-
04-10-2004, 12:35 AM #4Originally Posted by HyperSick
If you have wireless wide open with DHCP, the wireless router running NAT, you could always argue in court that someone else was feeding off of your internet. Now, if you are bulging muscles, the judge probably isn't gonna believe you, but still....
If you really want to be safe, encrypt EVERYTHING you do. Wiretapping internet communications is still a pain in the ass. It can be done, but generally won't happen unless you are a big player.
-
04-12-2004, 11:12 PM #5
Wireless and security are two words IMO that don't mix. It would make it eaiser for someone to monitor your actives if you are using wireless. And, MUCH eaiser to monitor if the wireless network is poorly configured.
Peace,
CC
-
04-15-2004, 09:09 PM #6
CarbonCopy is on the mark. The wireless if anything while freeing you from wires may make you more vunerable. I live in an apartment complex and also have wireless. If I take a wireless survey of the building I can actually see other unsecrued routers. I have been able to connect to these routers and essentially become part of their network. With the advancement of the wireless tech. the transmission distances are ever increasing. Some steps you can take is most routers will let you specify the MAC or hardware address of the wireless network cards that should have access. Also you can use various forms of encryption WEP / DES etc. to encrypt the traffic between your machine and router.
-
05-31-2004, 01:29 PM #7New Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 28
Wireless Inet Router
Yes. If you dont turn on your WEP (built in wireless encryption) in the wireless router, your open play in the air. Normally, 50' away from the house you can be hacked without WEP.
-
06-26-2004, 02:52 AM #8
Listen to me. If the feds are sitting outside your house monitoring your internet activity on a laptop then you are ****ed anyway. I can barely get good signal strength downstairs on my laptop let alone at my neighbors house. Security issue? Very small. Those things dont have enough range to put you in any significant danger. Although in repsonse to your question.... absolutely not. Internet is internet. The only differance would be... their trace would end at your wireless router which does absolutely dick to help your situation as it has still been traced to your residence.
-
06-26-2004, 09:22 AM #9Originally Posted by Hometown Hero
-
06-26-2004, 10:51 AM #10Originally Posted by bad_man
depending on the routers strenght.. most domestic ones go about 50 yards.. i have a 802b rounter and i can bearly get a signal outside my house.. but then again i didnt get it run around the neighborhood with it.. also a huge mestike thats very common among newbies is the lack of a password protected access..
-
06-26-2004, 12:08 PM #11
I used to work for the phone company in the central office. There's nothing you can do to stop the feds from monitoring what you do over the phone lines unless you can develop an encryption system of your own. All phone lines have to be run through equipment in the central office that allows it to be monitored remotely. And you're not going to have the Feds sitting outside your window monitoring anything. They can sit in a nice comfortable office in Washington and listen to your conversation in California. They can be in China and monitor your internet activity in Texas. If you thing someone is on to someing you're doing, the only thing you can do is to stop. If you have certain operating systems, they can even check out whats on your hard drive while you're on the internet. Keep in mind, the whole concept of the internet was based on military and CIA use for decades before it was made available to the public.
-
06-26-2004, 03:38 PM #12Originally Posted by Elliot
-
06-26-2004, 03:40 PM #13
Actually now that you mention it Barns and Noble? Thats a corporate network... more then likely running an NT system. I would say they have stronger networking equipment then your average bear. How did you crack in if you dont mind my asking... after you located the signal?
-
06-27-2004, 10:45 AM #14
Its easy to access data if a person does not set their security on their firewall correctly. I have some novice friends who haven't paid for intenet access in over a year cause they live in different apparentment buildings and just go off of someone elses wireless network connection. But basically if someone really wants to see what you are doing it is next to impossible to prevent it. I work in security for a large company and try to hack in to find any holes, and there are lots of companies who do this for banks and other places with high security. Heck even the miliary and government pays to have someone try and hack their systems and find the holes. If they are leaving holes open a single individual definatly is. But honestly, they aren't going to put through their efforts to try and track someone for what they consider minor issues like roids. I have a firewall and and also continuously monitor connections to my computer so if there is a hole I will see the person connect and I know what needs to be fixed.
- Sweat plus sacrifice equals success. - Charlie Finley
- It doesn't get easier, you just get faster. - Greg LeMond
-
06-27-2004, 12:46 PM #15
I've been getting service off a few of my neighbors for the past 6 months. Couple of the signals i pick up are password protected, others only work in specific parts of my apartment.
-
06-27-2004, 01:21 PM #16Originally Posted by Hometown Hero
If anyone is interested though, PM me and I can direct you to some sites where you can learn the basics of hacking and cracking.
-
06-27-2004, 03:42 PM #17Originally Posted by doby48
-
06-27-2004, 09:02 PM #18Originally Posted by bad_man
Last edited by Hometown Hero; 06-27-2004 at 09:10 PM.
-
06-27-2004, 09:09 PM #19Originally Posted by doby48
-
07-02-2004, 06:25 AM #20
On the other hand, I believe you can lock down home wireless routers/AP's to a point that is going to keep the wannabe haxorz and amateur night hackers out. Keeping the Feds out is a different story. But, if you are worried, I'd use PGP for your email transactions and PGPDisk to secure your stored data. There is even PGP software that interfaces between your pc and phone to encrypt your conversations. Pretty slick stuff! I'd like to see some chumps break that *ish.
Peace,
CC
Peace,
CCLast edited by CarbonCopy; 07-02-2004 at 06:28 AM.
-
07-02-2004, 06:34 AM #21Originally Posted by doby48
Cool job you have! What type of firewall do you use at home?
Peace,
CC
-
07-02-2004, 12:19 PM #22
I could tell you but then I'd have to kill you . I've used a few different ones, my favorite software based one though is Kerio and in addition I use Netstat commands to monitor, although Kerio has a monitoring pane which returns the values of Netstat commands. Kerio is cool cause you can chose the application, protocol, local and remote port for each item sepearatly, and can set your trusted zones (although someone hacking with a spoofed common IP like 192.168.0.x would have a free ticket in so I don't recommend it) where as some of the more popular (and sucky) ones are easier for the novice but not as secure like the ever popular ZoneAlarm.
IMHO the key to any good firewally is knowledge and the monitoring.- Sweat plus sacrifice equals success. - Charlie Finley
- It doesn't get easier, you just get faster. - Greg LeMond
-
07-02-2004, 03:06 PM #23
they are tracking u right now, i would log off if i were u
-
07-02-2004, 03:34 PM #24Originally Posted by bubbathegut
- Sweat plus sacrifice equals success. - Charlie Finley
- It doesn't get easier, you just get faster. - Greg LeMond
-
07-02-2004, 11:25 PM #25Originally Posted by doby48
you can lo jack me.... ::awaits the macing::
-
07-03-2004, 10:41 AM #26Originally Posted by Elliot
- Sweat plus sacrifice equals success. - Charlie Finley
- It doesn't get easier, you just get faster. - Greg LeMond
-
07-03-2004, 11:48 AM #27
sounds similar to checkpoint firewall one ... what a amazing firewall that is.
-
08-17-2004, 11:42 AM #28
I didnt read ALL the replies, but if it wasnt already said, you should also log into your router and supply a range of IP addresses that your wireless will allow to connect (of course your normal ip range should include your computer's ip (which if using DHCP, find that range and put it in the router)).
And for those who already said it, wireless makes it usually easier for people to get in because not many do security. You can take your wireless ready laptop around your neighborhood, scanning, and get on someone else's network pretty easily.
-max
-
08-18-2004, 07:59 AM #29
hmmm... well I just got a wireless router as well. Firewall feature is on. I turned on the WEP encryption and created a password to get on the network. I also set it up so only the MAC addresses of the my two computers can connect. Only two computers at a time can connect. I also made up a funky name for my network and turned off the SSID broadcast after I set up the notebook... I have Zone Alarm Pro on both computers as well...
Is there anything else I can do to prevent outsiders from getting in?
-
08-18-2004, 01:47 PM #30LM1332 Guest
No, because you are still using the internet. The only advantage you get is wireless part but then again its a minimul advantage because its really slow
Originally Posted by UrbanLegend
-
08-18-2004, 06:16 PM #31Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 270
Originally Posted by arthurb999
a dedicated linux/iptables machine statefully filtering inbound/outbound traffic rather than relying on 'onboard pc firewalls'. is a good idea to up the level of security, but you need to know your stuff to set it up...
i woulnt worry about it too much as physical access to the machine is more likely from "government officials"
-
08-18-2004, 06:18 PM #32Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 270
Originally Posted by LM1332
so not "really slow"!
-
08-18-2004, 10:35 PM #33LM1332 Guest
haha isnt really close range though?
Originally Posted by weightshead
-
08-19-2004, 03:28 AM #34Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 270
Originally Posted by LM1332
as long as you have a good connection being 1 metre or 20 metres away from your wireless access point wont noticably affect the "speed" of your connection.
-
08-19-2004, 04:18 AM #35LM1332 Guest
20 meters is not good though. From the box where internet gets hooked up to my room in my house its about 20 if not more. Hmm nuh ill just stick to my basic cable. DSL sucks btw
Originally Posted by weightshead
-
08-19-2004, 10:12 AM #36Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 270
Originally Posted by LM1332
-
08-19-2004, 01:35 PM #37LM1332 Guest
haha alright, alright you win
Originally Posted by weightshead
-
08-19-2004, 02:00 PM #38
I have wireless B and use the WEP encryption and the speed seems good to me...
-
08-19-2004, 11:42 PM #39
I didnt even really bother reading the above - but a wireless interent connection - imo is easier to hack then the hardwired.
2 simple programs is all you need - although - it may take a few days
-
08-20-2004, 09:01 PM #40Originally Posted by HolidayStyles
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS