Results 1 to 15 of 15
Thread: Short Cycles (4 Wks) and PCT
-
09-10-2004, 04:55 PM #1
Short Cycles (4 Wks) and PCT
It has now been one month or so since I finished my 16 week cycle of Prop, EQ, a little tren and finishing with anavar . I gained a total of 15 pounds. I have one more day of Clomid and Nolvadex and I am done with PCT. So far I have lost 3 pounds. Bench has gone down only 10 #'s and I have to say this has been a great cycle even if I loose a few more pounds I will still have 10 pounds of gained muscle mass. One question I have though: has anyone had good success with short cycles like 4 weeks prop and than 4 weeks off? I think that will be my next cycle in a few months just keep it short and simple and see what kind of results I get.
-
09-10-2004, 04:58 PM #2
Haven't tried one myself bro, But a lot of people do short 4-6 week cycles and swear by them. I'll leave the floor open for anyone who has had experience with them.
-
09-10-2004, 05:10 PM #3
i'd like to hear more about that too, bump
-
09-10-2004, 05:29 PM #4
maybe if your cutting but id never do a 4 week bulk cycle
-
09-10-2004, 05:56 PM #5Originally Posted by pietro75
-
09-10-2004, 06:57 PM #6
Anyone 4 week cycles..Bump
-
09-11-2004, 09:47 AM #7
Bump- got some BM prop lying around, so I wanna know too!
-
09-11-2004, 10:36 AM #8
i havent done any but i have a bro who has. IMO they are pointless to go less than 6 actually 8. he does those 4 weeks cycles with test prop and tren and swears by them for strength. but for size well lets jsut say hes only gained like 10 lbs in the past year and he constantly does them
-
09-11-2004, 05:04 PM #9New Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 1
Originally Posted by w_rballs
ok the gains will not compare to longer ester,s and courses , but as bb is for life the benifits to health far out weigh the longer course approach.
its simple really, long or longer courses, more or stronger gear used will affect your body, short courses are healthier and easy to keep, with greater hpta recovery .
kr liverpool
-
09-11-2004, 05:32 PM #10
ive never done it,but i make my best gains in the first 4-6 weeks of any bulking cycle,so it may be worth trying
-
09-11-2004, 06:20 PM #11
4-6 weeker are no good in my book jmo i like 8-12 cycles at lesat
-
09-11-2004, 06:56 PM #12
Short cycles are cool, depending on what results you are looking for. TNE would be better then prop, also fast acting gear like Dbol , Halo...winny..you get it. This can be debated all night though. The debate of irregular blood levels..PCT..blah blah blah. Sh!t man, try it out. Theres a good thread I read a couple years ago about short cyles using Dbol, ill find it.
-
09-11-2004, 07:33 PM #13National Level Bodybuilder
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 1,588
I've read about short 4 weeks cycles in BUILDING THE PERFECT BEAST. i started to do one of them but 2 weeks into the cycle I said to hell with it and turned it into a 16 weeker. i'd like to see someone else try it first, it wont be me.
-
09-11-2004, 09:07 PM #14
Lots of ideas but has anyone actually had good results on a 4 week cycle and what kind?
-
09-11-2004, 10:23 PM #15
I could never do a 4 week cycle... Get myself all excited about sticking
myself and then stop 4 weeks later... never gonna happen that way... lol
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Tren Cycle (blast)
01-06-2025, 11:29 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS