Results 1 to 17 of 17
Thread: UG gear vs. int. gear
-
11-28-2004, 03:48 PM #1Associate Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 202
UG gear vs. int. gear
I'm sure this has been asked before, but which do you think is better overall ? I am currently running some gear from a respected ug source and I'm not seeing the results I should be. Especially on my injectables. But at the same time, the last time I used gear like QV, brit dragon etc... it's been bunk. Lots of counterfiets out there with those types of labs. But how do you guys sort through all of this ??? Thank you for your time.
Served
-
11-28-2004, 03:58 PM #2
wut lab r u running? lots r underdosed
-
11-28-2004, 05:08 PM #3
I think if you have a good UG lab source, then its better then int. gear
peace
Alex
PS: it all depends on the consitancy of their products though
-
11-28-2004, 05:43 PM #4
Fake QV, Fake BD and bogus UG. Are you sure it's the gear?
-
11-28-2004, 05:47 PM #5
sounds like your source is bunk not the gear, bc from the way it sounds, your getting real crap, find a new bro and goodluck
-
11-28-2004, 08:29 PM #6Associate Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 202
Thanks for your input guys. I know there are a lot of threads about ug labs etc.. and I appreciate you taking time out and replying. The problems I mentioned above has happen over a few years, especially the qv and bd, but the ug lab is recent. Don't want to mention the lab just out of respect. I think it may be good stuff but way underdosed.
-
11-28-2004, 08:30 PM #7Associate Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 202
P.S. IMO i think the more popular the lab becomes the more it is likely to be underdosed. h*ll, its hard producing products for hundreds of people. ..someone is going to get screwed!! lol
-
11-28-2004, 08:33 PM #8Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 594
If the UG lab is crap - POST A PIC.
I have used both. Got burnt BIG on UG.
Now it's QV all the way. It's sealed, capped, in the box and shrink wrapped everytime so there's no guessing. Just a tip.
-
11-28-2004, 08:38 PM #9
bro if its a reliable source and your not getting the results you want dont be so fast to blame the gear.
-
11-28-2004, 08:41 PM #10Associate Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 202
Hey porkchop. I agree with ya. Brother, I have gotten bunk QV in the past year or so that has been shrink wrapped, boxed, with the hologram!! The gear had a yellowish color to it instead of clear. Test enanthate btw. Also it didn't hurt like a mofo like the real stuff. well, hurts for me anyway. That is why I'm so lost about all of this. I'm spending hella money and I just want so good stuff. ya'll bruthas understand!!
-
11-28-2004, 08:48 PM #11Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 594
Originally Posted by Served
-
11-28-2004, 08:51 PM #12
what do you agree with he said qv all the way then you said you agree and you got fake qv stuff?
Originally Posted by Served
-
11-28-2004, 08:51 PM #13Originally Posted by Pork Chop
-
11-28-2004, 08:52 PM #14
bro no offence but it seems that its you not doing the things right not the gear. post your diet.
-
11-28-2004, 09:05 PM #15Associate Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 202
Originally Posted by Jackman
-
11-28-2004, 09:33 PM #16
Post some pictures of the gear, and someone will straiten it out for you
Peace
Alex
-
11-28-2004, 10:12 PM #17Originally Posted by Served
Thats enough of a reason to say which UG your using. I've been juicing on and off for a long time and I can definently tell if the gear I'm using is bunk. And let me tell you, if what is happening to you happens to me. I won't hesitate in mentioning which UG gear I think is bunk or underdosed. But since your not mentioning the name, then your not 100% sure if your training and eating right.
Micro
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Tren Cycle (blast)
01-06-2025, 11:29 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS