Thread: Most powerful roid
-
01-05-2006, 02:29 PM #41Originally Posted by DaBoy7777
-
01-05-2006, 02:33 PM #42Originally Posted by tranzit
It's more than a transport agent.. In fact, saying that it's basic use in bodybuilding is relegated to that is akin to blasphemy.
And the veiny look with slin pre-contest? BS.
We drop it the week prior because it makes one hold water.
Just an FYI ole boy.
Originally Posted by tranzit
-
01-05-2006, 02:35 PM #43Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington state
- Posts
- 1,248
Yes test shut your mouth you skinny bitch! lol
J/k
-
01-05-2006, 02:37 PM #44Banned
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 2,399
Originally Posted by Swifto
thats like a super sust with a bonus..lol
not many said test suspension?
-
01-05-2006, 02:38 PM #45Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 262
Suspension for pure mass tren is good at building muscle and cutting fat but mg for mg suspension is stronger
-
01-05-2006, 02:41 PM #46Originally Posted by Narkissos
-
01-05-2006, 02:41 PM #47Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington state
- Posts
- 1,248
Originally Posted by Narkissos
yes, i do know of body builders who have died or whos body has become dependent on slin.
-
01-05-2006, 02:47 PM #48Banned
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 2,399
taking from profiles forum on suspension:
"Testosterone Suspension is an injectable hormone in a water base that was developed and used for decades and is actually the first anabolic , androgenic steroid used. For the purpose of building mass, Testosterone Suspension has never been surpassed since it was first developed in the 1930's."
"As was noted before, testosterone can be considered one of the most powerful mass builders and testosterone suspension can be considered one of the most powerful of the testosterones simply due to the fact that it has no attached ester. This means that you are getting 100mgs of Test per 100mgs you inject; Suspension is the only version of Testosterone that can boast that claim."
-
01-05-2006, 02:49 PM #49Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington state
- Posts
- 1,248
http://bjsm.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/37/4/356
http://www.webmd.com/content/article/72/81527.htm
http://www.healthypages.net/news.asp?newsid=3704
i could go on forever.. but i have shit to do so ill let you explain all of this mr bodybuilder. and the next time you come here to flame somone pick another target, as i am getting a little annoyed with you always trying to make me look stupid.
-
01-05-2006, 02:50 PM #50Originally Posted by tranzit
-
01-05-2006, 02:53 PM #51VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Get him Tranzit!
-
01-05-2006, 02:54 PM #52Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington state
- Posts
- 1,248
No and im also not sure what caliber the gun was that killed JFK but i know hes dead. I dont need to go into elicit detail to prove your wrong. Its all in every medical journal i have ever read.
-
01-05-2006, 02:55 PM #53Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington state
- Posts
- 1,248
I'm trying K hehe.. hes stubborn you know that.. but i will win! i will!
-
01-05-2006, 02:57 PM #54Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington state
- Posts
- 1,248
ok im going tanning and to hit the gym. Ill pick this up when i get back.. so nanny nanny boo boo to you nark! =P
-
01-05-2006, 03:04 PM #55Originally Posted by tranzit
a. Illustrated that bodybuilder in question was using slin recklessly. He was using a slow-acting insulin for dieting.. probably to induce perpetual ketosis. When he switch to the short acting insulin (the one we use with preference in the post-prandial application) he went hypo. It was plain ignorance.
Long-action insulin isn't safe for bodybuilders period
b. Gave a basic insulin faq
There is no documentation of pancreatic burnout.. the guy didn't die.. What are you really trying to show with this link?
Originally Posted by tranzit
No pancreatic burnout... no pancreatic suppression.
Low blood sugar... What?
Originally Posted by tranzit
Originally Posted by tranzit
-
01-05-2006, 03:04 PM #56VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Yeah when you come back post what you have on exogenous insulin induced pancreatic burnout.
-
01-05-2006, 03:06 PM #57Originally Posted by tranzit
-
01-05-2006, 03:11 PM #58Originally Posted by RM_DUDE
-
01-05-2006, 03:13 PM #59Originally Posted by tranzit
-
01-05-2006, 03:13 PM #60Originally Posted by tranzit
-
01-05-2006, 03:16 PM #61Originally Posted by scriptfactory
Originally Posted by scriptfactory
Tranzit...
reveiw: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi.../full/24/3/430
conclusion:
Since i know you'll probably want a summary here:
The DCCT and other studies proved the importance of good blood glucose control in preventing eye, kidney, and nerve complications in people with both type 1 (127,8). Unfortunately, when the DCCT results were released, the only way to achieve better glucose control was more daily injections associated with more daily blood glucose tests, or the use of an insulin pump-delivery system. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to show a decline in HbA1c values in a general diabetes clinic after the DCCT report. The decline in HbA1c was most dramatic in teenagers and adults in the first year after the DCCT. These were the age-groups in which the DCCT data were shown to be applicable. Unfortunately, values leveled off between 1994 and 1996. In this study, the decline in HbA1c values from 1993 to 1996 in adults was significantly related to the use of intensive therapy. As described in the DCCT (1), and as found in this study, the incidence of severe hypoglycemic events increased. The increase continued in 1995 and 1996, even though HbA1c levels stabilized, presumably due to the continued attempts to lower values and the occurrence of "hypoglycemia-unawareness" with the greater duration of tighter control. The realization of the need for improved glycemic control, associated with a two- to threefold increase in severe hypoglycemic episodes, led to displeasure from both diabetes care providers (9) and patients.
Our study showed that the introduction of Humalog insulin made it possible to obtain the goal of improved blood glucose control without any further increase in severe hypoglycemic episodes. Alternative explanations for these outcomes might be the patient cohort changing during the study period, advances in glucose monitoring, insulin administration, increased familiarity with intensive diabetes management, and educational strategies. Humalog insulin resulted in lower postprandial blood glucose levels in every study in comparison with values after regular insulin (10–13). This was primarily because of higher insulin levels 30 to 90 min after injection, which closely matched food absorption. Many studies also showed a decline in severe hypoglycemic episodes (10–14), particularly during the nighttime. In addition, the frequency of hypoglycemic events in people using insulin pumps declined when Humalog was used in the pump rather than regular insulin (15–18).
Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration initially approved Humalog only for children older than 12 years of age and adults, we and most others began using it in patients of all ages (19,20). Humalog was particularly helpful in children younger than 5 years of age with variable appetites. In toddlers with type 1 diabetes, postprandial administration of Humalog showed lower postprandial glucose excursions when compared with preprandial human regular insulin (20). In the current trial, the major reasons for not changing to Humalog insulin were the physician’s choice, insurance companies not willing to reimburse the cost of Humalog, and lower socioeconomic status.
The decline in HbA1c levels after the introduction of Humalog occurred without an increase in the number of severe hypoglycemic episodes. Instead, a decrease in the number of severe episodes was found. This result is particularly important in young children, in whom severe episodes may result in brain damage (21,22). Patients and health care providers are more likely to accept intensive insulin therapy if it does not result in a greater risk for severe hypoglycemia (which can result in death).
As described in the DCCT (5), the 13- to 18-year age-group had the highest level of HbA1c values. Increased insulin resistance in this age-group is one possible cause for such values (23,24). It is likely that behavior (including food choices) and psychological issues may also contribute to the higher HbA1c values in teens. The 5- to 12-year age-group probably had lower HbA1c values because puberty and insulin resistance were not yet present and because parents have more control and influence over diabetes care during this period. Although we only recommend HbA1c values <9.3% in toddlers, when the brain is still growing and hypoglycemia can often not be recognized, their HbA1c values were not as high as might have been anticipated. Clearly, the adult group consistently had the best HbA1c values, probably because of lack of insulin resistance and better understanding of diabetes.
In conclusion, HbA1c levels declined in all four age-groups after the DCCT. Unfortunately, in concurrence with the findings of the DCCT, the number of severe hypoglycemic episodes increased. However, a second significant decline in HbA1c values occurred with the introduction of Humalog insulin. Fortunately, the incidence of severe hypoglycemic episodes did not increase after Humalog therapy. It will be important with future changes in care (e.g., introduction of continuous glucose monitoring) to document changes in HbA1c levels as well as in the incidence of severe hypoglycemic events in diabetes clinic populations of all ages
-
01-05-2006, 03:21 PM #62VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by JamesC
-
01-05-2006, 03:21 PM #63Originally Posted by tranzit
And quite well delivered Tranz.
M.
-
01-05-2006, 03:22 PM #64
O sorry.. you probably want it in ENglish don't you Tranzit?
In english.. for tranzit
Narkisssos:
Short acting insulin , namely humalog..potentially novalog, used in the post-prandial (PWO) phase reverses insulin resistance in type I diabetics.
Seeing that post-prandial application is the procedure recommended to bodybuilders to maximise glycogen supercompensation etc. ... It is highly unlikely that anyone can become insulin dependent from slin-use... especially with the infrequent (i.e. training days only), short-cycle (4-6 weeks) use.
Further more.. the addition of slin to a cycle can ease the workload of the pancreas... as th pancreas doesn't have to pump out ass much slin to deal with the transporation of the high amounts of nutrients (carbs; aminos) bodybuilders consume
~Narkissos
-
01-05-2006, 03:26 PM #65VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by Narkissos
-
01-05-2006, 03:26 PM #66
Now Tranzit... i'd like to understand.. it was not my intention to own you in this manner.
I was just curious about the bodybuilders you claimed to know who were insulin -dependent.
However, since you forced me to retaliate.. i did.. and without name-calling... Just pure hard facts.
In the future.. i'd advise if you are gonna call me out.. at least know what you're talking about...
Copy and paste , no reference, shit.. don't fly here
~Narkissos
-
01-05-2006, 03:27 PM #67Originally Posted by big k.l.g
But you gotta give me credit for the perpetual cycle theorem... i got the "humalog reverses insulin resistance" study months back ..and relayed it's info in planning the perpetual cycle theorem.
We work good together
Woot!
-
01-05-2006, 05:58 PM #68Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington state
- Posts
- 1,248
Im editing this becouse i dont feel like being banned...
Last edited by tranzit; 01-05-2006 at 06:08 PM.
-
01-05-2006, 06:12 PM #69Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington state
- Posts
- 1,248
Note to members, never try and argue with Mod's it gets you terminated. 90% of the most informed experienced users here get banned calling people on their bullshit.
Or this could be propaganda by me..
-
01-05-2006, 06:16 PM #70Originally Posted by tranzit
No, seriously. Do you know someone who was hurt by insulin ? I am really curious about these sort of things.
-
01-05-2006, 06:22 PM #71Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington state
- Posts
- 1,248
Yes, two people a guy named jerome amature heavy weight from my area 5-6 years ago died as he abused slin ****ed his blood suger up he went into shock and died. another guy i know is now dependent on insulin shots becouse of abuse.
-
01-05-2006, 06:23 PM #72Originally Posted by DaBoy7777
as for the girl, i fvcked her when i was a "skinny kid"
-
01-05-2006, 06:24 PM #73Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington state
- Posts
- 1,248
test you skinny bitch what did i tell you? haha nice pics bro. You look really hot in the purple kini
-
01-05-2006, 06:24 PM #74VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by tranzit
Nothing is wrong with your opinion as log as you do it in a respectable manner. I also agree with Nark, if you make a claim you better have some proof to back it up.Last edited by BajanBastard; 01-05-2006 at 06:28 PM.
-
01-05-2006, 06:29 PM #75Originally Posted by tranzit
-
01-05-2006, 06:30 PM #76Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington state
- Posts
- 1,248
also never argue with people from 18-25 they have done everything and know everything.. or at least they can find it in a book the have read.
I am a firefighter, thats what i do for a living is ride around in medic units so excuse me if some mod on a forum whos almost 10 years my Jr's support of a substance that i HAVE seen kill and effect people in person dosent fly with me. Just becouse you have used slin with no sides so far dosent mean that it will stay that way forever. ALSO its human nature to push the envelope so what starts out at 4 weeks can turn into 8 or into everytime i go out to s club or whatever.. thats the way it works.. it breeds abuse. Both people i mentioned were abusing but that is a given i never said one injection of slin would kill you or mess your body up.
-
01-05-2006, 06:32 PM #77
This thread is getting rather ugly...lol...
-
01-05-2006, 06:36 PM #78Originally Posted by Pinnacle
-
01-05-2006, 06:37 PM #79Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington state
- Posts
- 1,248
I agree, but using big words and book research isnt cutting it for me. Real world is people abuse this stuff and it can kill them. And before the argument comes up you can abuse anything and kill yourself thats true but this one can do it pretty fast.
-
01-05-2006, 06:37 PM #80Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington state
- Posts
- 1,248
Pinnn!!!! THE VET!! can you drink winny?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Gearheaded
12-30-2024, 06:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS