Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    flyhalf's Avatar
    flyhalf is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    michigan
    Posts
    322

    nolva taking away from gain?

    has anyone ever had a problem with taking nolva through a cycle? i know a ton of guys on here that take it throughout there cycle but i have also heard that you dont get the full effect of your gear when taking it. is this bullshit? comment.

  2. #2
    shortie's Avatar
    shortie is offline AR Biggerologist
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Back in da box!
    Posts
    3,409
    It does interfere with gains slightly due to reduction in IGF levels(if my memory serves me)but this amount is so insignificant I would much rather lose .0000001 of my gains than grow man titties.

  3. #3
    one8nine's Avatar
    one8nine is offline Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,469
    i thought because it made it so your muscles coulndt break down as much so it cant repair to be bigger

    IMO use an AI i have not read anythign about those hindering gains

    i mean it couldnt hur tto have on hand just in case or whatever but i dont think you need to take it from the start, there are better options

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Prop ED Builds Character
    Posts
    932
    Better Safe than sorry, who cares about the minimal effect it has on muscle regeneration. I will personally never use any AAS without an AI alongside. Kinda like batman and robin, which is a horrible comparison, but you get the point...

  5. #5
    flyhalf's Avatar
    flyhalf is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    michigan
    Posts
    322
    what AI do you recommend? i have L-dex on hand.
    Last edited by flyhalf; 07-29-2006 at 03:03 AM.

  6. #6
    shortie's Avatar
    shortie is offline AR Biggerologist
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Back in da box!
    Posts
    3,409
    Quote Originally Posted by flyhalf
    what AI do you recommend? i have L-dex on hand.


    Kinda depends on the AAS you are running for your cycle, but IMO ldex is a good AI pretty much across the board.

  7. #7
    Pooks's Avatar
    Pooks is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,365
    I use nolva .5mg a day..

    and i gain weight just fine. I use it for bloat control.
    At first i was skeptical like you, but came to a point where i could not stand the moon face.
    Last edited by Pooks; 07-29-2006 at 08:04 AM.

  8. #8
    one8nine's Avatar
    one8nine is offline Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,469
    Quote Originally Posted by Pooks
    I use nolva .5mg a day..

    and i gain weight just fine. I use it for bloat control.
    At first i was skeptical like you, but came to a point where i could not stand the moon face.
    you use a half of a miligram?

  9. #9
    Pooks's Avatar
    Pooks is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,365
    Quote Originally Posted by one8nine
    you use a half of a miligram?
    my bad .5ml of the ARR type... to lazy to check on actual miligrams sorry :-(

  10. #10
    Lavinco's Avatar
    Lavinco is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    901 N 2nd St Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,492
    Quote Originally Posted by one8nine
    i thought because it made it so your muscles coulndt break down as much so it cant repair to be bigger

    IMO use an AI i have not read anythign about those hindering gains

    i mean it couldnt hur tto have on hand just in case or whatever but i dont think you need to take it from the start, there are better options
    I am convinced by personal experience that Letro hinders gains.

  11. #11
    briancb1 is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    839
    In my personal opinion, I believe if someone had good gains from a cycle and developed gyno then that would throw them off mentally and physically. I got a pea sized lump in my let nipple from Ph's and it pissed me off/freaked me out to a point where I wasn't performing in the gym as well and it did affect my mood and workout all together. I would rather play it safe.

  12. #12
    rock75's Avatar
    rock75 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,118
    Quote Originally Posted by one8nine
    i thought because it made it so your muscles coulndt break down as much so it cant repair to be bigger

    IMO use an AI i have not read anythign about those hindering gains

    i mean it couldnt hur tto have on hand just in case or whatever but i dont think you need to take it from the start, there are better options
    agree bro, definitly have it on hand, you nvr know how you are going to respond - unless you are using the same substance as before at the same levels and you didn't run anti-e's, not everyone is going to be prone to gyno

  13. #13
    Merc.. is offline Steroidpedia
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    8,496
    Blog Entries
    4
    This has been posted here before but just wanted to put it back up for some feedback on this article...


    Nolvadex is the trade name of a drug containing a molecule called Tamoxifen . Its primary use by male bodybuilders is to prevent gynecomastia (the growth of the breast tissue). It was introduced by steroid guru Dan Duchaine 25 years ago. After a quarter of century, it is time for an update about its use. What I am going to demonstrate is it is high time to eliminate Nolvadex from the bodybuilder's drug stacks.


    A little bit of history


    Back in the late 70's, more and more bodybuilders developed strange lumps around their mammary glands. At first, no one really took notice but more and more competitors grew a gynecomastia. In 1981, the M Olympia had a pretty serious gyno. This was shortly after the introduction of this new drug by Dan Duchaine. At the time, it was a pretty good idea as no one else could came up with a solution in order to prevent this growing problem. Nolvadex was popularised by Dan's first Underground Steroid Handbook. Dan even states that "this drug has a lot of potential but hasn't been used enough yet to find it". After more than 25 years of intensive usage, it is my opinion that it is time to forget about Nolvadex. Why? First, because newer and more effective drugs have been developed. Second, because it seems obvious that Nolvadex impairs muscle growth.


    Nolvadex and muscle growth


    After so many years of usage, it seems pretty clear that if Tamoxifen helps prevent the growth of the nipples, it also weakens the anabolic properties of steroids in a majority of bodybuilders. We are frequently said that this weakening effect is due to the anti-estrogenic action of Nolvadex. According to the fantasy, muscles require both testosterone and estrogens to grow at an optimal rate.


    This belief is derived from the results of studies showing that without estrogens, testosterone alone possesses minimal anabolic properties. By increasing the density of androgen receptors, estrogens render the muscles much more sensitive to testosterone (1). This has been demonstrated in a very specific muscle called the levator ani. But this muscle does not reflect what happens in the muscles bodybuilders are interested in (2). Estrogens have even been shown to reduce muscle fiber size (3-4). I think this effect of estrogens is closer to what we experience on bodybuilders.


    Another popular explanation of the weakening action of Nolvadex is provided by studies which have shown that it reduced the plasma level of IGF-1. I do not think this is a primary explanation.


    What Nolvadex truly is?


    Most lifters assume Nolvadex is a pure estrogen antagonist (which would mean it prevents estrogens from acting on their receptors). As far as bodybuilding is concerned, this assumption is very wrong as Nolvadex is both an estrogen receptor agonist and an antagonist. It all depends upon the tissues. Along with the nipples, on which Nolvadex acts mainly as an antagonist, we are also interested by its behaviour on skeletal muscles, on the liver and on the fat cells.


    Nolvadex has been shown to behave as estrogens in skeletal muscles (5). This is a very good thing for every athlete except bodybuilders. You see, estrogens protect muscle cells from the training-induced damages (5-6). It means that one can train more without damaging his muscles. Recovery will also be much faster. But for bodybuilders, the training-induced damages are a key ingredient to trigger growth. Nolvadex will therefore reduce the muscle building effects of resistance training.


    As for the impact of Tamoxifen on IGF-1, it simply demonstrates another estrogen-like action of Nolvadex. By rendering the liver less sensitive to growth hormone (probably by reducing the liver density of GH receptors), estrogens and tamoxifen diminish the production of IGF-1. This action of estrogens explains why women produce less IGF-1 than men even though they have a higher GH level.


    Nolvadex and muscle definition


    Within 24 to 48 hours, Nolvadex is able to greatly increase muscular definition. As a result, bodybuilders assume Nolvadex will help them reduce their bodyfat level. But this rapid cutting action of Nolvadex is due to an anti-estrogenic action on water retention. Estrogens will make you hold water. Nolvadex will produce the opposite effect. But it says nothing about the impact of Tamoxifen on bodyfat. Depending upon your own production of estrogens and your estrogen receptor density on adipocytes, Nolvadex can act as an antagonist (which would help you lose fat) or an agonist. In that case, Nolvadex will make you fatter especially in the lower body area.


    Conclusion: if the introduction of Nolvadex 25 years ago was a brilliant idea, times have changed. Very effective anti-aromatase drugs (such as Letrozole or Anastrazole) have been introduced. They will fight gynecomastia, help prevent the anti-anabolic actions of estrogens, fight fat and water retention. They will also boost natural testosterone production far more effectively than Nolvadex. So, it is up to you to decide whether you wish impair your rate of progression with an outdated drug or move on to the 21st century.

    Bibliography:

    (1) Max SR. Androgen-estrogen synergy in rat levator ani muscle: glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase.

    Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1984 Dec;38(2-3):103-7.

    (2) Rance NE, Max SR. Modulation of the cytosolic androgen receptor in striated muscle by sex steroids.

    Endocrinology. 1984 Sep;115(3):862-6.

    (3) Kobori M, Yamamuro T. Effects of gonadectomy and estrogen administration on rat skeletal muscle.

    Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Jun;(243):306-11.

    (4) Suzuki S, Yamamuro T. Long-term effects of estrogen on rat skeletal muscle. Exp Neurol. 1985 Feb;87(2):291-9.

    (5) Koot RW, Amelink GJ, Blankenstein MA, Bar PR. Tamoxifen and oestrogen both protect the rat muscle against physiological damage. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1991;40(4-6):689-95.

    (6) Naessens G, De Slypere JP, Dijs H, Driessens M. Hypogonadism as a cause of recurrent muscle injury in a high level soccer player. A case report. Int J Sports Med. 1995 Aug;16(6):413-7.

  14. #14
    gixxerboy1's Avatar
    gixxerboy1 is offline ~VET~ Extraordinaire~
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    32,802
    I use nolva all the time w/o problems.
    Alot of stuff gets blown way out of proportions. With all the shit i do in my life according to half of this BS i would be 110lbs

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •