Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    reddragon4954 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    829

    Tren E vs. Tren Ace

    I know the esters are different, but will one give you better results than the other?
    I mean since Tren Ace is a shorter ester wouldn't it actually be more potent than Ten E? And if thats true, is it a noticeable difference?

  2. #2
    Mista Massive's Avatar
    Mista Massive is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,087
    not trying to sound rude mate, but using the search bar would provide you with answers to your questions.

    this is a topic that has been discussed many times before

  3. #3
    Titleist's Avatar
    Titleist is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,357
    You will get more active hormone mg per mg with Tren Ace, because of the ester. Results will be the same. Some notice less sides with one or the other, but that is really individual ***endant.

  4. #4
    Random is offline RETIRED VET
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    3,368
    this is a topic that has been discussed many times before
    LOL see what i mean Mista Massive..

    CD

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    864
    Tren Ace was some powerful stuff - for what it is.
    The best of both worlds, losing and gaining with a touch of sharpening your muscles.
    My bicep/triceps were beautiful on that cycle. You just have to cycle it every 3 days.

  6. #6
    fLgAtOr is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    2,758
    Quote Originally Posted by New2Anabolic
    Tren Ace was some powerful stuff - for what it is.
    The best of both worlds, losing and gaining with a touch of sharpening your muscles.
    My bicep/triceps were beautiful on that cycle. You just have to cycle it every 3 days.
    What do you mean?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    864
    I meant inject.

  8. #8
    gixxerboy1's Avatar
    gixxerboy1 is offline ~VET~ Extraordinaire~
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    32,802
    Quote Originally Posted by New2Anabolic
    I meant inject.
    no bro. You should do it ED maybe eod at the absolute min. Every 3rd is wrong and not even an option on tren A

  9. #9
    Anavar Man's Avatar
    Anavar Man is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    512
    Would you recommened taking Tren A weeks 1-8 or 4-8 on a 12 week cycle with test added? Some say to take it 1-8 because of shut down and 4 additional weeks of test will help?

  10. #10
    tdh_jsn's Avatar
    tdh_jsn is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    by the beach
    Posts
    27
    you only need to run test about two weeks longer than tren a, no need to run four weeks longer.

  11. #11
    fLgAtOr is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    2,758
    Quote Originally Posted by Anavar Man
    Would you recommened taking Tren A weeks 1-8 or 4-8 on a 12 week cycle with test added? Some say to take it 1-8 because of shut down and 4 additional weeks of test will help?
    For your particular cycle, it won't make a difference for recovery. You could actually run it just about anywhere you want to...

    The logic is that you will run your test slightly longer just to make sure there is no tren hanging around when you try to go into recovery, as it can be particularly supressive. (You will still be "shut down" but your PCT compounds won't have to fight against any tren in your system.)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •