AI during cycle

**hockeyguy** · 05-15-2008, 10:20 PM

starting my first cycle and read the link that C_Bino has on gyno. I will be running sust 10 weeks eod. Is it a must to run an AI during your cycle if you have no signs of pre gyno?

**WEBB** · 05-15-2008, 10:23 PM

its not a must, its just a really good idea....just cause you dont show signs now doesnt mean you wont get it....precaution is the best plan bro...its cheap and is soooo worth it....

**jc95605** · 05-15-2008, 10:31 PM

I'm asssuming the same would be for test e? I heard that using an AI while on cycle can lessen gains?

**WEBB** · 05-15-2008, 10:42 PM

yes the same is true no matter what the aas is.....while it can hinder a very samll amount of gains, i would rather get 99% of my gains and use an AI then 100% and get gyno, but hey thats just me and my 8 years of experience talking....hahahha

**hockeyguy** · 05-15-2008, 10:54 PM

would running letro be the best choice than?

**jc95605** · 05-15-2008, 11:00 PM

hmm.....agreed. AI it is. I heard that letro is a pretty hardcore AI, that for a first cycle arimdex is a better choice.

**WEBB** · 05-15-2008, 11:02 PM

go to the PCT thread sticky and do soem reading to see what suits ya best man, just make sure you do something....

**Elias** · 05-16-2008, 04:33 AM

why it is said to keep an AI or nolva on hand in case of gyno signs?!! since ur goin to take any of these from the begining? why not just say use an AI from the first day?
i am currently on test prop and am using nthing till now.....but i have everything on hand(letro,arimidex ,nolva,proviron ) ..... should i start or wait for any sign?
thx

**ChuckLee** · 05-16-2008, 07:04 AM

Originally Posted by Elias

why it is said to keep an AI or nolva on hand in case of gyno signs?!! since ur goin to take any of these from the begining? why not just say use an AI from the first day?
i am currently on test prop and am using nthing till now.....but i have everything on hand(letro,arimidex ,nolva,proviron ) ..... should i start or wait for any sign?
thx

Because they will suppress your estrogens and as you should know, they play in any case an important role in muscle builfing, stimulating IGF production.
So just run them to be safer or if you are gyno prone or so.
But it isn't a "must" imo.

Check this:
http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?t=319202

**ChuckLee** · 05-16-2008, 07:06 AM

...so wait for any sign imo...but any minimal sign

**gixxerboy1** · 05-16-2008, 10:39 AM

i always run adex now. I dont see a reason not to. I rather be safe. I agree with webb it would be such a small about of gains lost if any not worth.

**WEBB** · 05-16-2008, 08:21 PM

Originally Posted by gixxerboy1

i always run adex now. I dont see a reason not to. I rather be safe. I agree with webb it would be such a small about of gains lost if any not worth.

a very wise man that Gixxerboy....hahahaha

**jc95605** · 05-16-2008, 08:29 PM

lol nice WEBB. Just to let you know you convinced me to. During my cycle i'm planning on running .25mgs ed.

PT · 05-17-2008, 03:47 AM

im not gyno prone and when i was younger i used to run 1000mgs of test a week without anything but now i use a low dose of armidex with every cycle to help keep the water weight to a min.

**hockeyguy** · 05-18-2008, 12:17 PM

So I think I will run armidex from the start just to be on the safe side, but is it pretty typical to run it a .25 mgs ed? Also I was planning on running Nolva and Aromasin for PCT but since I will run Armidex at the start will this stll be ok for PCT? Thanks