Thread: BF% and AAS
-
06-01-2011, 07:21 PM #1Associate Member
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Posts
- 171
BF% and AAS
Just wondering for interest sake. I always see people suggest against AAS with high BF%. Is this simply because of the obvious proper diet and exercise is still needed or for some other reason?
-
06-01-2011, 07:27 PM #2
Lower BF, less sides, better gains.
-
06-01-2011, 07:35 PM #3
the only reason i can think of is the asthetics involved
meaning a cut person would look like they will have gained more due to being so lean
im in the high teens, low 20s and all cycles i have run ended up leaning me up, even though i gained 15-20 lbs
go figure
-
06-01-2011, 07:57 PM #4Associate Member
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Posts
- 171
Thanks appreciate the info
-
06-01-2011, 08:46 PM #5
No. It is because the aromatase enzyme is highly concentrated in fat cells. The more fat you have, the more estrogen conversion you will experience.
Last edited by Bonaparte; 06-01-2011 at 09:07 PM.
-
06-01-2011, 08:58 PM #6Staff ~ HRT Optimization Specialist
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
- Arctic Circle
- Posts
- 4,286
Not to nitpick you chief, but I was under the impression it was stored in adipose tissue, not fat cells (slight difference), or am I wrong ?
Also, a high BF is typically correlated to a non-dedicated person. Showing that a person could cut from 25% BF to 15% BF would be more likely imply they have the self control and responsibility of handling AAS.
-
06-01-2011, 09:06 PM #7
-
06-01-2011, 09:18 PM #8
I think that there is some truth to less sides but i mostly think its stupid. Im 6'3" 313lbs and 17% bf and it certainly doesn't look bad. Not everyone wants to be a body builder or a skinny ass abercrombie and fitch model.
Last edited by buffgator; 06-01-2011 at 09:30 PM.
-
06-01-2011, 09:20 PM #9Staff ~ HRT Optimization Specialist
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
- Arctic Circle
- Posts
- 4,286
-
06-01-2011, 09:22 PM #10
-
06-01-2011, 09:31 PM #11
windex good point
bigd89 ill post some tonight in the members pic section
-
06-02-2011, 04:00 AM #12Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- OC/LA Cali
- Posts
- 186
-
06-02-2011, 05:47 AM #13
I also agree Buff.Look at some of the powerlifters.I aint talkin about the ones who are really big so they can lift heavy.I am talkin about the big thick ones who just aint cut up.And dont care to be.Like you said.Not everyone wannts to cut up.
-
06-02-2011, 07:41 AM #14
I totally agree. So many guys get attacked because they have 15% or 17% BF when really, unless your competing or something that is not that high. And if anything, I get better gains in strength when on and at about %15. Everyone carries BF differently too. I personally don't like when I get below 15%, feel like I am starting to look small.
-
06-02-2011, 03:55 PM #15Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- OC/LA Cali
- Posts
- 186
Amen, everybody has different goals and purpuses. Different stroks for different folks.
-
06-02-2011, 04:11 PM #16
-
-
06-03-2011, 10:06 AM #18
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
How to not stress about a heart...
Yesterday, 10:41 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS