GH VS Anabolics

**todkbear** · 03-04-2012, 02:03 PM

I'm trying to put on some size and was going to purchase some GH, but was told that instead I should get 2 cylcles of Tren , Masteron , Primobolan and Winny. He told me that I would get pretty much the same results (obviously I would save money). I had originally planned two cycles:

Round 1:
Gh
Test E
EQ
Turinabol

Round 2:
Gh
Sustanan
Deca
Turinabol

What are your thoughts? How much and how long would you recommend running GH to see some size gains?

**gixxerboy1** · 03-04-2012, 02:06 PM

all 4 options are not good.
gh is a long slow process. You need to run it for at least 6 months. And there are alot of fake gh's out there
what are your stats.?

**songdog** · 03-04-2012, 02:23 PM

Who ever is giving you advice dont know wat he is talking about.

**todkbear** · 03-04-2012, 10:16 PM

O.K. That is exactly what I thought. Everything I've read says it takes at least 5 months for any results from growth. And what he is trying to get me to take is what I would take pre contest. I need to add some size. Currently, I am 6'1" 240lbs 14%BF.

**cb714** · 03-05-2012, 02:16 AM

I would seriously reconsider taking that persons advice. Especially if they are the ones trying to sell you the stuff.

Seriously though, real gh is hard to come across and when you find some, its expensive! Now lets say you're rich and money is not an issue and you do find yourself some real hgh.. if your goal is to gain muscle, HGH is not the way to go. Sure it works in the LOOOONG run but I think you can gain the same amount naturally. Another downfall of HGH is that it is not selective in which cells it helps reproduce. When you take HGH, everything grows, not just muscles. This means that a tiny tumor you may have that may have never grown will for sure grow and if it is cancerous, youre in trouble...its like fueling the fire. My advice is stay away from HGH. A lot of people disagree with me but I believe that for muscle building purposes AAS is the way to go, hands down.

**PARABOLAN** · 03-05-2012, 04:22 AM

I really believe u should stick to steroids at this point..

**swm1972** · 03-05-2012, 07:20 AM

You didn't mention how old you are. I truly believe if you are older you see faster, better results with lower doses of HGH.

I believe this because you have naturally declining levels at older ages. Just replacing your depleted natural production should provide Excellant results.

**ScotchGuard02** · 03-05-2012, 09:24 AM

HGH used alone is not a recipe for size gain. It's too expensive and takes too long to be effective as an anabolic agent. AAS is much more efficient and much cheaper. If this is your first cycle, I'd drop everything on your list except Testosterone . See how your body reacts to the Testosterone before you start stacking the AAS.