Thread: BF to high?
-
10-29-2012, 04:06 PM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Posts
- 40
BF to high?
What's up guys
Thinking about starting my first cycle in a week or 2.
Stats
31years
195 lb
16.3 bf
Running test only
250mg twice a week l-dex as needed pct. Nolva and clomid
Just wanted your advice on starting at this bf%. And if this would add any sides.
-
10-29-2012, 04:15 PM #2
I would get your bf% under 15% to lessen sides.
-
Go to 10/11% and then start a bulking cycle
-
10-29-2012, 04:19 PM #4New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Posts
- 40
Originally Posted by t-dogg
-
10-29-2012, 04:37 PM #5
-
10-29-2012, 04:45 PM #6
You will want to post your complete stats/goals to get good advice.
-
10-29-2012, 06:07 PM #7New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Posts
- 40
Originally Posted by fit2bOld
Goal to bulk lean . I do a lot of high intensely training due to the fact that I'm involved in marathons and obstacle runs.
-
10-29-2012, 06:09 PM #8
Get your body fat below 12% you will enjoy the cycle results more with less sides.
-
10-29-2012, 06:10 PM #9Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- FLORIDA
- Posts
- 325
Xalos21 How long you been in the gym also were did you get your bfi at?? just curious I dont see very many marathon runners with that high of a bfi
-
10-29-2012, 06:10 PM #10Productive Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Jorgia
- Posts
- 3,353
-
10-29-2012, 06:12 PM #11Productive Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Jorgia
- Posts
- 3,353
16.3% is pretty good with your stats. It would help to get down a bit, but you are planning to bulk. I assume you are going to cut after?
-
10-29-2012, 06:13 PM #12
You can start using test now. Yes, estrogenic effects increase in probability when body fat is higher, but you're still well within a controllable range. I wouldn't, however, worry too much about adding a lot of extra mass right now. That requires excess calories even with steroids .
-
10-29-2012, 06:19 PM #13Productive Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Jorgia
- Posts
- 3,353
Sort of what I was thinking. The test itself should decrease BF pretty well. At 16%, I could see it reducing dramatically, especially if diet is dialed in.
-
10-29-2012, 06:19 PM #14
16.3 isn't bad if you're running test. If you're running winny for example, you're wasting time.
-
10-29-2012, 06:19 PM #15Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- CANADA
- Posts
- 13,200
Your results will be favorable if you cut first then bulk. Lots of information here on the benefits of cutting then bulking.
Good luck.
-
10-29-2012, 06:20 PM #16Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- CANADA
- Posts
- 13,200
-
10-29-2012, 07:10 PM #17New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Posts
- 40
Originally Posted by realgear
-
10-29-2012, 07:17 PM #18New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Posts
- 40
Originally Posted by warmouth
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Gearheaded
12-30-2024, 06:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS