-
12-09-2012, 12:53 AM #1
Nandrolone Phenylpropionate (NPP) Vs. Deca Duraboline (deca)
Can I get some votes on which is better (in your opinion). ?
I have received a bottle of Sciroxx Nadrolex 100 (npp 100). What can I expect? ed...or eod??? how many cc's? etc...
-
12-09-2012, 01:01 AM #2
Eod and its just deca with a short ester. Great stuff imo. Dosing depends on you....
-
12-09-2012, 05:05 AM #3Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Kitchen, Gym, Kitchen....
- Posts
- 13,716
Get a couple more bottles and run 100mgs eod 8-10 weeks. Run prop w/it too. I like 100/150 respectively.
-
12-09-2012, 05:22 AM #4
-
12-09-2012, 07:39 AM #5
Thanks guys. @stpete...thanks bro I was thinking the samething... Yeah it was cool that my buddy was thinking about me (missing the birthday) BUT now I have to pick up a couple more IF I plan to use with any type of good result! That sneaky bastard!
-
12-09-2012, 08:58 AM #6
You also dont get the water retention with npp like you do with deca .
-
Caber with the NPP since its a 19 nor?
-
12-09-2012, 10:29 AM #8
Waffle... Do what? Caber?
-
12-09-2012, 04:23 PM #9Originally Posted by songdog
-
12-09-2012, 06:38 PM #10Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- CANADA
- Posts
- 13,200
-
12-09-2012, 09:44 PM #11
I like npp wayyyy better. I get little to no bloat with it and it's much more predictable. Ester weights about the same with deca and npp if I remember right so your getting about the same amount of active compound with both.
-
12-09-2012, 09:49 PM #12
love it ... but with one bottle your not going to see the true benifits of the drug...
-
12-09-2012, 09:53 PM #13
-
12-09-2012, 10:08 PM #14Originally Posted by Metalject
-
12-09-2012, 10:34 PM #15
THe problem with that is if you take NPP or Deca , you do not receive any Nandrolone in your body until the ester detaches from the hormone. Once the ester detaches, you're left with the same Nandrolone hormone, the same identical Nandrolone hormone. Being used for performance or therapeutic purposes does not change this fact.
-
12-09-2012, 10:52 PM #16Originally Posted by Metalject
-
12-09-2012, 11:43 PM #17
Glad you brought that up. Over the years I used test-e for most of my cycles, bulking or cutting. Always liked Testoviron and for a long time had a very good deal on the product. Anyway, it was always much easier to control side effects with frequent injections rather than only 1-2/wk. I actually preferred 250mg/eod even though it was a large ester based testosterone . I think it's important to keep in mind that even with a large ester there is some activity early on. For example, when you inject test-e, although it's slow releasing it's only slow releasing overall. When you inject test-e you actually get a sharp spike in testosterone in the first 48hrs after the injection then the following slow continuous release. If you take your total dose and inject it 1-2 times per week, you create a larger initial spike, when you split it into much smaller doses you get a smaller spike, which can be easier to control.
Anyway, I cannot say this is all factual but it's a good theory IMO. What we do know without question is the hormone, whatever hormone that may be, doesn't become active until it's released from the ester. When we understand that other various theories begin to carry a little more weight IMO.
-
Always hear about it with Tren and I'm going to run NPP next cycle so figured I'd ask. Thanks Mick!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Maximizing Your Strength Gains...
Today, 12:51 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS