Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    roadglide83's Avatar
    roadglide83 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    84

    blast and cruise vs traditional time on = time off

    How much further ahead would one expect to be as far as muscle growth if they constantly blasted and cruise compared to traditional cycling. I understand the health risk and possible hrt down the road but with all that to the side would you see a large difference over the course of say 1-3 years?

  2. #2
    MuscleInk's Avatar
    MuscleInk is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,449
    Quote Originally Posted by roadglide83
    How much further ahead would one expect to be as far as muscle growth if they constantly blasted and cruise compared to traditional cycling. I understand the health risk and possible hrt down the road but with all that to the side would you see a large difference over the course of say 1-3 years?
    Simply not worth the risk. Results are typically better if you can completely cycle off between cycles and its far healthier.

  3. #3
    Muscleduke's Avatar
    Muscleduke is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by MuscleInk View Post
    Simply not worth the risk. Results are typically better if you can completely cycle off between cycles and its far healthier.
    But is it really healthier? Blasting and cruising is much easier on the hormones rather than going off and on isn't it?

  4. #4
    roadglide83's Avatar
    roadglide83 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    84
    IDK as far as healthier. My thought is I already have low test levels and HRT is a deff possibility so why not just blast and cruise. I would like to know everyone's opinions on why blasting and cruising is not as healthy.

  5. #5
    PistolPete33's Avatar
    PistolPete33 is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    3,068
    If your shutdown for years you're guaranteed to be on TRT for life. I started TRT a year ago and it's totally changed my life without question. However, living without always having to inject yourself is a much better lifestyle.

  6. #6
    roadglide83's Avatar
    roadglide83 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    84
    In your personal opinion is once weekly injections really that bad compared to the benefits you receive from it?

  7. #7
    michael30's Avatar
    michael30 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    801
    I do twice weekly, an yes it gets old!

  8. #8
    PistolPete33's Avatar
    PistolPete33 is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    3,068
    Quote Originally Posted by roadglide83 View Post
    In your personal opinion is once weekly injections really that bad compared to the benefits you receive from it?
    It's a MAJOR pain in the ass. I was sick with the Flu this week and having to give myself injections when I could barely get up with torturous. Plus, whenever you go anywhere you have to plan how to bring all your gear and having to inject twice a week with test and 2-3 more times for HCG is a major pain in the ass. It's not worth the risk. It has changed my lifestyle for the better since I feel this way but if I didn't have low test I would feel this way without living with sticking myself all the time.

  9. #9
    roadglide83's Avatar
    roadglide83 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    84
    I can see where you are coming from with this. Thanks for the input.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •