Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
01-31-2014, 08:43 PM #1
blast and cruise vs traditional time on = time off
How much further ahead would one expect to be as far as muscle growth if they constantly blasted and cruise compared to traditional cycling. I understand the health risk and possible hrt down the road but with all that to the side would you see a large difference over the course of say 1-3 years?
-
01-31-2014, 11:14 PM #2Originally Posted by roadglide83
-
02-01-2014, 03:54 AM #3
-
02-01-2014, 11:16 AM #4
IDK as far as healthier. My thought is I already have low test levels and HRT is a deff possibility so why not just blast and cruise. I would like to know everyone's opinions on why blasting and cruising is not as healthy.
-
02-01-2014, 12:00 PM #5
If your shutdown for years you're guaranteed to be on TRT for life. I started TRT a year ago and it's totally changed my life without question. However, living without always having to inject yourself is a much better lifestyle.
-
02-01-2014, 12:42 PM #6
In your personal opinion is once weekly injections really that bad compared to the benefits you receive from it?
-
02-01-2014, 01:06 PM #7
I do twice weekly, an yes it gets old!
-
02-01-2014, 01:12 PM #8
It's a MAJOR pain in the ass. I was sick with the Flu this week and having to give myself injections when I could barely get up with torturous. Plus, whenever you go anywhere you have to plan how to bring all your gear and having to inject twice a week with test and 2-3 more times for HCG is a major pain in the ass. It's not worth the risk. It has changed my lifestyle for the better since I feel this way but if I didn't have low test I would feel this way without living with sticking myself all the time.
-
02-01-2014, 05:17 PM #9
I can see where you are coming from with this. Thanks for the input.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Dutasteride dosage while on and...
Yesterday, 06:43 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS